Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Boys and girls...

Firstlly let me start by saying thank you for coming along to the event. It was a pleasure to meet some of you for the first time. It was great also to meet up with some old timers also (Gorden). Special thanks to Richard at "All Star" from running the night. Also special thanks to all those who put their cars on the dyno for my personal enjoyment.

Thanks to Karen (SMR33) for coming along to sign up 2 new members.

Time for the results. (This will be updated as numbers come to hand, please pm me your numbers)

In running order.

1. Col-GTSX - No Record of this run!!!

IMG_1859.jpg

2. booosted33

155rwkw@170kph

978nm@134kph

IMG_1753.jpg

3. Rhinorebel

195rwkw@166kph

1287nm@136kph

IMG_1757.jpg

4. 666DAN

169rwkw@154kph

1185nm@126kph

IMG_1762.jpg

5. J-Boy

315rwkw@192kph

1735Nm@156kph

(Running Very Rich)

IMG_1778.jpg

6. N15mo

147rwkw@158kph

992nm@126kph

IMG_1779.jpg

7. r33skyliner

207rwkw@164kph

1407nm@124kph

(Running dangerouslly lean)

IMG_1783.jpg

8. R34GTX

176rwkw@162kph

1165nm@136kph

IMG_1794.jpg

9. Ryn26

157rwkw@154kph

1060nm@144kph

IMG_1801.jpg

10. bunta

178rwkw@158kph

1239nm@128kph

IMG_1806.jpg

11. Owned

196rwkw@172kph

1205nm@158kph

IMG_1809.jpg

12. Shaneo81

208rwkw@176kph

1318Nm@140kph

IMG_1812.jpg

13. R32 Driftah

167rwkw@158kph

1135nm@130kph

IMG_1826.jpg

14. gts25t4door

123rwkw@170kph

973nm@94kph

IMG_1830.jpg

15. Nathan - Username?

114rwkw@138kph

909nm@118kph

IMG_1839.jpg

16. Fish

102rwkw@142kph

771nm@126kph

IMG_1846.jpg

17. Luke - User name?

270rwkw@178kph

1655nm@144kph

IMG_1854.jpg

18. Col-GTSX

198rwkw@194kph

1434Nm@104kph

IMG_1859.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116562-sau-qld-dyno-night/
Share on other sites

Please use this thread to continue chat about the everning... The other thread has become too full of useless info to make any sence...

Dont forget to PM me your numbers so i can update the overall list and add the figures to the DVD...

Thanks Col

My issue is sorted now ! The only problem I had was low oil preassure, I have since found out the oil I was using was too light and when it got hot it became far too thin! changed from 10w40 to 10w60 and problem solvered!!!

Apart from the oil I was pretty happy with how the car ran reved out nicely with no misfires or other carry on..happy with the torque too not bad for the stock turbo :worship:

The reason I need a few months is for bigger and better things :spank:

Its all updated guys... Final results are in...

Any update on what the Motec corrections meant??

No word yet but i will find out asap... All i can tell you is that 'boosted33' and I were both running on 3.75 motec correction and everyone else was higher than this number. I am assuming as this stage its a wheel spin compensator or traction setting. But i will get confirmation on this figure and what it means...

I was sent all the dyno sheet in an email today and i have to say that there are some cars out there in need of a tune... :D There are some really nice torque curves and nice power curves (from what i can see in the kw dept) but yeah interesting to see the difference inbetween shaneo81's car and mine. Being they are similar but with different turbos...

had a great night... was hapy with power figure... gonna get power fc soon so that should get theings happening... makes decent drift power. serves its purpose... nice to meet some more people!

So which car was yours... Sorry just wanta update the pics...

looks like an awesome night! wish i could have made it to this one

oh well.. next time i suppose

poeple who have their dyno figures above should also post their mods so we at least know how they correalte

as for this "motec correction" thing.. does this mean the dyno was reading high or low?

Warren

looks like an awesome night! wish i could have made it to this one

oh well.. next time i suppose

poeple who have their dyno figures above should also post their mods so we at least know how they correalte

as for this "motec correction" thing.. does this mean the dyno was reading high or low?

Warren

It reads lower than a Dynodynamics in shootout mode by about 10% but who knows what is "right" ;) stoopid dynos causing controversy since their inception :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...