Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 513
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

well.....I have heard of some non tubro cars with side exhausts pointing at the sound meter getting caught, but it is very unlikely a skyline would have a problem, the 30m away makes a big difference.

Have you heard Neil's rotor? that is under 95db at 30m.....

Just another quick question:

"Maximum drivers per car = 2" - Is the entry fee for the day then charged per car, or per driver?

eg. We pay a single entry fee, and its ok for one of my mates to have a lap or two in my car... OR

eg. We pay 2 x entry fees and we are allowed to share one car...

eg. We pay 2 x entry fees and we are allowed to share one car...
That is the way RENEW are working it. This is because at some of our earlier days, we had a few people exploiting the system, and running a heap of drivers per car. The second driver can either be a mate, with no car there apart from your car, or could be another entrant who you want to let drive your car.

As for the noise limits. That is a requirement of the EPA, and is measured and enforced by Wakefield management. It is up to them how strict - or not - they want to be.

Guys, if you have any other questions, it would be best to email the guy who is leading the organisation for the day, RENEW President Nathan, [email protected], as he will be able to give you definate answers, and quickly. Please read the form that RXBO5S posted up first though, as the answers to some of your questions may be in there.

Cheers, and see you on the day,

Craig :D

RENEW Secretary

95db at 30m is not strict its just in there as it is an EPA requirement for the track, all tracks for that matter.

Entry fee is per driver and there is a maximum of 2 people to share a vehicle. This is confusing cause it is in CAMS language, they class the car as an entrant and drivers as drivers.

Those of you who have already paid to Adam please make sure you get the entry form filled out and faxed or emailed ASAP, the details will be given to the lap timing people so they can enter it into their software.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...