Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i'll be running an rb25 pfc in my rb24det using the rb20 loom and sensors in the next week, from what i can see of the wiring diagrams carl h is correct. should just bump and run.

when using one of these does all the options show correctly on the power fc controller?

i also was under the impression the series 2 ran different coils, the power fc's have the same part number so is that more wiring related?

in respect to the gtr power fc, from what i also understand it runs exactly the same pin out however the afm's need to be run in parallel and likewise with the oxy sensors. is this correct?

when we tried this on my buddies car it booted up fine and started right away, put it into the monitior mode and it displayed everything that would normaly be displayed on the rb25pfc.

played around with it and to check that the car was indeed running right lowered the revlimit to 1.5k and low and behold it cut at 1.5.

I think the RB25 PFC is a better bet for an RB20 than the GTR model, reason being that the RB20/25 share the same type of knock sensor (resonant) and the RB26 uses a flat response (non resonant) sensor.

The RB25 PFC is designed to work with the type of knock sensor that the RB20 has.

hey mate heres the pinouts for r32 rb26 ecu

rb26 ecu pinouts

are you sure this is correct? these pin outs are almost the same as the rb25 sheet here (incl the injector grounds which are different)

if you check the loom on rb20det.com you will see there is a difference between the rb20/20 det and i was always under the impression the r32 rb series had the same loom

POST EDITED

Loom is correct. I have the manual for ca18,rb20de,det,rb25de,rb26dett (r32) and it looks like that changing to a rb26 power fc you also need to swap 112 & 114 pins around + the rewiring of the afms etc

Edited by SirRacer

Using an rb26dett loom on an rb25de (r33 head) the differences are

Differences

* Wastegate valve control solonoid (dont see why u wont need it anyway)

* AFM Ground (wire afm in parallel and would be fine or dejetro)

* AFM Intake sensor front (depending on what one you use you could run 2 or wire as above, i think the 26 expects a different air temp sensor though)

* Intake air temp sensor

* Throttle valve switch (dont have a clue what this is but affects r32 also)

* Fuel pump terminal control output 1

* Fuel pump terminal control output 2

* Sub electrical fan relay

r32 rb25de(Loom is basically same as rb20det, however rb20 has a fuel control terminal volt control output and FICD solenoid input signal.

rb20/25de (r32) with r33 rb25 computer

Differences

* FICD solenoid input signal (not used by r33 computer or rb20det loom)

* Swapping of injectors to suit loom 112 & 114

* Throttle valve switch (isnt on r33 loom)

r33 rb25de loom is the same as rb25det

some things we may need to clarify( i think they are for the slushbox) so power fc wont support them anyway

* Throttle sensor output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Throttle valve switch power supply

* Intake air output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Engine A/T control input signal

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing. Cam is smaller than before.. though the old cam was +6 degrees advanced. We're talking huge changes here, the narrowbands want to trim out 20% of fuel and pull the (wideband) idle to like 16.0 AFR or such. One side is a little more trimmy than the other. Think along the lines of ~20% to ~15-18%. Unfortunately my scouring of the internet hasn't really found anyone with this issue. People either just disable NB's or have them wildly different, where one is -20% and the other is +20 or 0 (i.e a sensor is just dead/wiring is just busted). Turning them off and relying on the base map only results in the wideband reporting at about 14.0 with the Varex closed. It'd be a little leaner (closer to 14.7ish) with the Varex open. I know I can just change the switch points so that the narrowbands agree with the wideband, but it's still odd. Both of them are reading voltage, it's just that they're reading quite high mv, in the ~800 region. It's just odd. This was with the IAT fudged to report it was about ~22 degrees which is my guesstimation of the temperature in the room. I have an OEM sensor ready to try tonight, which is slow and crap - but .. worked last time I used it. Sadly I am aware that idle tuning with the big TB is going to be a PITA and I look 'forward' to many hours spent stalling or stumbling idle or delving into drivability things.
    • The GTR strut brace clears the new manifold.. by about 0.5mm. So this means I need to buy an OEM GTT Strut brace (again), which will clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. I guess I can sell the GTR Strut brace with the bonnet with the vents as a package deal as someone will need this one day. So my choices are vented bonnet but no strut brace, or GTR Bonnet with OEM brace (which I have to buy) but is bright red instead of the same colour as the rest of the car, which means the entire front end of the car will just be red until it goes back to paint jail. In other news the engine starts and doesn't leak. Why both O2 narrowband sensors think the tune is rich AF I do not know. The idle is also pretty shitty and my expensive IAT sensor from the USA is dead. The car sounds awful. But I assume or at least hope this is due to the many exhaust leaks, and the concrete garage it is in, sitting there with 0 intake bolted to it, and no bonnet or panels or anything to stop the induction/intake sound which is about 200db.
    • C'mon! At least come kicking and screaming into the 2000s. BA XR8 bulge.
    • No such thing as E30 in Sydney servos As stated above, flex fuel is your only viable,  and "safe" option I believe
×
×
  • Create New...