Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The main points of nitrogen is that it doesn't leak unless you have a puncture or faulty valve, and the pressure doesn't go up as much with heat.

If I can find a place to do it for $5 a wheel when I buy my new tyres, I will definitely be getting it. Mainly for the convenience of never having to top up my tyres.

JimX,

I think if the tyre shop wants your business, considering your buying new tyres.. ask them will they throw in the nitrogen at no cost. Otherwise, I'm sure someplace else will.

PS: there a lot more profit in tyres than the "I'm only making $10 a tyre a that price"

I got it done on my little Alfa 147.

I used to scrape the driveway badly some days, and not at all on other days.

With nitro in the tyres I never scrape every single day now (it's been 5months on nitro, never needed a top up). So there's proof of consistency as on hot days my tyres would inflate, and thus get into the driveway without scraping, on cold days I would scrape like mad.

Also noticed a gummier feeling all round.

i had a friend fill his tyres with nitrogen on his s2000 before coming to trackday. wether it was done correctly or not i dont know, but he was saying his tyre pressures did fluctuate quite alot with heat. it goes against theory but i had to mention it nonetheless. perhaps the tyres werent fully deflated when refilling with nitrogen? who knows...

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

i had a friend fill his tyres with nitrogen on his s2000 before coming to trackday. wether it was done correctly or not i dont know, but he was saying his tyre pressures did fluctuate quite alot with heat. it goes against theory but i had to mention it nonetheless. perhaps the tyres werent fully deflated when refilling with nitrogen? who knows...

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

franks,

Sort of "Off the topic", but I thought honda had a semi recall on the S2000, because the cars wouldn't handl correctly. If I recall correctly, Apparantley the only tyre that correctly fits the S2000 is a particular Bridgstone S02??

franks,

Sort of "Off the topic", but I thought honda had a semi recall on the S2000, because the cars wouldn't handl correctly. If I recall correctly, Apparantley the only tyre that correctly fits the S2000 is a particular Bridgstone S02??

would be quite an agreement between honda and bridgestone if that was the case wouldnt it be??? :) i heard something similar to that but i can't qualify it ;)

jimx, ...... daymn!

After a couple of track days you would know what to set your cold/hot pressure to for best grip/handling. Nitrogen tyres still change pressure just claim not as much. You will still find that tyre temperature and track temperature and track surface quality will make differences to how your car goes around the circuit anyway.

The main benefits would be if nitrogen is more consistent, and keeps your tyres cooler. Some people say this is noticeable, others say it's not. Might be worth experimenting in if you're really keen on getting that last bit out of your car but I'm sure other upgrades make a bigger difference to confidence and lap times.

I believe they use nitrogen in aircraft tires. Prolly because they dont expand like air and the pressure in the tires stays constant.

MoonButt

Just on a side note. All high altitude planes use nitrogen. The reason is that pure nitrogen has no water. If normal air is used, once the aircraft gets up to altitude where the temp is well below freezing the water vapor could condense and freeze inside the tyre. This is not a problem until the plane lands and the out of balance wheel can cause lots of trouble.

90% of light aircraft use normal air.

As far as nitrogen not leaking. I find this hard to believe. If it were true then you could put normal air in your tyre and all the other gasses will leak out leaving the nitrogen behind :)

I work on several aircraft that use nitrogen in their tyres and they still need topping up on occasion.

On the other hand using nitrogen does have its advantages (all being mentioned previously).

If a place offered to put nitrogen in for free they yes go ahead, if you had to pay. I personally would not bother.

As far as nitrogen not leaking.  I find this hard to believe.  If it were true then you could put normal air in your tyre and all the other gasses will leak out leaving the nitrogen behind  :)  

I work on several aircraft that use nitrogen in their tyres and they still need topping up on occasion.

When they put nitrogen in, they take all the air and water vapour out. The reason why normal tyres leak a bit of air is they cause tiny spots of rust around the valve which causes it to leak. Once you put the nitrogen in there is no water vapour to cause the valves to rust so the valve holds better.

Sure it's not 100% airtight but it's a vast improvement.

air is 78% nitrogen , 21% Oxygen and 1% other stuff.

Per mole, Nitrogen weighs 28grams, Air weighs about 29Grams per mole.

One mole of gas at SLC is 24.5Litres.

Short answer, it dont make much difference. just wasting 5 dollars on each tire "making u think its better" :)

bro, phisics and chemistry suggests that there is no reason for there to be a vast improvement in the handling on your car, due to the fact you inflated your  tyres with nitrogen gas.

Air is 80% nitrogen...

I don't ever recall being told that it would vastly improve the handling in my car. It wasn't mentioned by anyone in this thread and I've never heard anyone else say it.

The main points of it were to slow or stop leakage from the tyres, and to improve consistency of tyre pressure over a wider temperature range. Personally I'd do it primarily for the former reason because I'm a lazy bastard. $20 to not have to bother checking my tyre pressures every week, sign me up.

The water vapour in normal air is also not good for the lining of your tyres (something else fixed by nitrogen), but we usually go through a set before this matters anyway.

I am no scientist but I am sure air is something like 60-70% nitrogen, 20-25% oxygen, plus other crap.

I actually am a scientist! haha I hate that description, it's a tossy term but true :)

As far as I'm aware it's not the fact that it's Nitrogen..it's the fact it's DRY nitrogen....compressed air is always heavily loaded with moisture. When your tyres heat up the water vapour expands much more greatly than the air inside.

Guy with compressors, just check your water trap whenever you use it, tons of the stuff!

This is what causes the fluctuations...for a race track DRY Nitrogen is way worth it as your tyres will heat up a fair bit...but for your everyday jaunt to Coles, the tyre companies are just ripping-off Joe Blo.

The reason they choose Nitrogen and not Helium or Argon, Neon etc...is the plain fact it's cheap and doesn't bleed out of the tyre as easily as other inert gasses.

Oxygen is also cheap, but let's face it who wants a hot tyre full of Oxygen near all those rubber fumes...whoompa a bright white flash as your tyres spontaneously combust!

Anyway that was my 2 cents ;)

Dan

oxygen is a hazardous chemical just like hydrogen. 100% oxygen will make things that don't burn easily, burn easily.

I was under the impression that compressed air wouldn't have as much water content as normal, but maybe not. I would say the benefit of having dry air would outweigh pure nitrogen. Sucking normal air through a dessicant prior to compressing would probably do the same thing.

on another note, arent plane wheels filled with nitrogen because its non flammable?

It's used because it doesn't expand much when heated. A normal aircraft will land at around 150-200mph and then brake quite hard which causes a hell of a lot of heat near the tyres which won't expand if filled with nitrogen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...