Jump to content
SAU Community

Clutch Slipping Since Rb25 G/box Conversion :(


Recommended Posts

ok

are rb20 / 25 / 26 clutches all interchangeable?

and is there something i've forgotten in the rb25 box conversion (possibly inside the bellhousing or something)?? it drives around but the clutch just slips under load!!!

...since i have done a rb25 gearbox conversion on my cefiro (rb20det) i have had issues with clutches -

firstly was a nismo gmax (2nd hand) but was working fine before conversion (blew the 20 box!!). since installing this rb25 gearbox had numerous problems getting it right - and the clutch not slipping...

NOW

i had a tilton twin plate fitted as the other clutch was slipping - and same again - minimal load / 0 boost / under 3000rpm and the clutch slips (running motor in so DEFINITELY no thrash/big load up)

had the box in and out changing things on it - changed the pivot ball to a longer one, as the clutch fork had play before and not even touching the slave cyl... but now the pin sits up on the fork nicely

cut the back of the carrier inside (i think thats what it was about 4mm) the bellhousing move it back a little as it was almost like the thrustbearing was constantly touching the fins (or front of the clutch)

the clutch pedal only has about 10-15% of the full pedal's worth that actually is being used to engage - disengage the clutch

rb25 box bolted straight up to rb20 motor - lengths were the same - gear lever comes out the transtunnel in the right spot etc...

WHAT THE HELL COULD IT BE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check its not leaking oil.

I had my clutch slip easily when my front input shaft seal was leaking/seeping.

I pulled off the clutch and it was a complete mess.

Replaced seal, no more slip.

But yours sounds extreme, so likely not related. :S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

used a 33 slave no oil leaks thanks cubes box has been out a few times

what would be the symptoms of a incorrect type of clutch being fitted i.e the whole push pull thing

I think maybe the last two clutches put in were a different type to what was required?

Ive heard you can convert them? read it in the hpi r34 build up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are rb20 / 25 / 26 clutches all interchangeable?

only rb20, rb25 series 1, and r32 gtr

had the box in and out changing things on it - changed the pivot ball to a longer one, as the clutch fork had play before and not even touching the slave cyl... but now the pin sits up on the fork nicely

that sounds like a problem there. From memory the slave should be touching the fork whithout pressure on the pedal. I cant remember if you can just turn the pin to make it longer to take up freeplay??

cut the back of the carrier inside (i think thats what it was about 4mm) the bellhousing move it back a little as it was almost like the thrustbearing was constantly touching the fins (or front of the clutch)

i think its supposed to be....

the clutch pedal only has about 10-15% of the full pedal's worth that actually is being used to engage -disengage the clutch

have you got under the dash to lenghten the master cylinder rod to adjust the pedal?

rb25 box bolted straight up to rb20 motor - lengths were the same - gear lever comes out the transtunnel in the right spot etc...

did you change bearing carrier over when you changed the clutches? make sure you have the right one in. This can stuff the clutch...

Edited by Bl4cK32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the info guys

BTW - it is a series 1 rb25 gearbox also so that should be ok.

and could it be possible that the master cylinder (changed to 33 slave cylinder) would need to be changed also?

Bl4ck 32

- so how can you tell what the clutch is meant for what type of motor?

- have changed to a longer pivot ball and slave pin was sitting on the fork not too much but but still applying some tension

- ok :blink:

- does this need to be changed with a standard clutch replacement also?

- the thrustbearings where changed previously with the old nismo gmax clutch, and it is still the same one - smaller than standard - that is being used on this tilton twin plate

thanks

-matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone else have any ideas???

was either thinking of replacing with a stock rb20det clutch just to see if that drives ok - then it will tell us if its either the wrong clutch (the twin plate) for the rb20det / rb25det gearbox setup; OR its in the actual motor/box setup :S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears you have fiddled with a couple of things that really shouldn't be fiddled with, as we do from time to time. :P

- have changed to a longer pivot ball and slave pin was sitting on the fork not too much but but still applying some tension

Return it to standard, run the standard fork, pivot ball and slave cylinder.

Standard everything.

- the thrustbearings where changed previously with the old nismo gmax clutch, and it is still the same one - smaller than standard - that is being used on this tilton twin plate

I believe this is where your problems stem from.

Get the correct thrustbearing for the clutch, don't try to fit one that is not designed for the use as it will stuff the clutch as what happened to bl4ck32's os twin plate when jms fitted/bodged it up to mattr's car.

Bl4ck32, Who was it that sorted out the thrust bearing for your clutch when it went in for balancing with the motor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks cubes

yep i am running standard fork / slave to suit the rb25 box had to change the pivot pall as we originally had the standard one in there and it wasnt long enough and the fork had exess play/movement

the thrustbearing also it could be i guess, but just using the ones that were given when buying the nismo clutch (NOW using the tilton twin plate)

i'm really leaning to stocking the clutch out / and stock thrustbearing / pivot ball just to see if it drives A OK and doesnt slip at least this would then eliminate either problem with 'BOX' or 'CLUTCH'...

and if it is ok with stocker maybe buy a single plate 6 puck new... at least then there'll be no issues with it

-----

BL4ck32 i am interested to hear more about the thrustbearing issue also

thanks

-Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slip has nothing else to do other than the clutch.

If you have had to play with the pivot its 100% completely obvious using the old thrust bearing setup is 100% not suitable.

Generally when you buy a clutch they come with a thrust bearing.

Every clutch I have bought has. :D

Grab the suitable thrust bearing that should have came with the clutch, throw in the origional pivot and it will work a.ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spoken to a couple more people and have also been told that in some cases you need to get an alternative carrier (from another rb25) as some are longer than others...

person i talked to - had same symptoms as mine - just load it up and it would slip - changed the carrier to a shorter one and it was A OK!...

:S i'm getting a headache...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they sent my twin plate to Xtreme clutch and they said it had the wrong thrust bearing carrier with it, and thats what may have damaged the clutch (bent metal plates).

I agree with cubes, set it up as per std -std pivot, fork, and slave. Master can stay as rb20 item. Find out the right carrier to go with that clutch for the rb25 box. Then fit the twin and u should be right.

Changing to a shorter carrier may not be the answer. U need to find what length for that clutch in that box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bl4ck32,

I noticed with the new clutch I had fitted the thrust bearing sat noticably forward on the carrier compared to the previous fairly std organic clutch.

I've noted the same with heavy duty clutches in the VS and previous cars.

My guess is, if your OS clutch was bought new to suit an RB25 it would simply come with a thrust bearing, no carier.

That thrust bearing would sit in the correct position on the std carrier in order achieve the correct positioning on the rb25.

Unless its impossible for the given clutch setup to use the std carrier with a specific thrust bearing.

That does sound unlikely as there's nothing special about a carrier that simple modification (when manufacturing) of the thrust bearing couldn't sort out.

Which brings me back to Huddy's problem... Were you given the option to purchase the suitable thrust bearing with your clutch?

It may be possible the clutch has been designed around the std rb25 thrust bearing. I find this unlikely as its easier/cheaper/quicker to make a generic clutch that works in all applications for say an 8" clutch, then use the thrust bearings positioning to achieve the movement required to engage/disengage the clutch.

As you stated you are running the nismo thrust bearing that is smaller and different to standard obviously throwing another spanner in the works.

Get on to Tilton and find out where you can obtain a thurst bearing suitable for an R33 Series 1 RB25DET Push type gearbox.

If they say use the std item.. you beauty. :D

damn back to my pl/sql home work. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've run into similar problems before, the first was when i snapped a diaphram in half on my old os twin plate, which i later found out was due to the stock carrier being longer than the os carrier. I didn't receive the carrier as i got the clutch s/h and didn't know any better. I also ran a stock type thrust bearing.

The second issue is probably more relevant to your question, which was also with the os clutch, was when i swapped master cylinders. I would have had a week wait for an r32 one from nissan, and they had an s14 one in stock so i got that seeing as i had a friend who had used one successfully. The problem was that it didn't have enough travel when installed into the 32 with my setup and so maintained pressure in the system, which when everything got hot (like sitting in traffic) it would just slip like a mofo as the expanding fluid caused the slave to push the fork a bit. I'm pretty certain that it was this situation that actually contributed the most to the failure of the clutch in the end.

The obvious check for that one is to see if you can push the slave cylinder back by hand when the pedal is up. It should move in with very little effort.

I found later that my friends car was also maintaining pressure in the system but as he was only running a single plate there was enough room to move that it didn't start pressing on the fingers.

I am assuming it's something like this as you have already checked for obvious leaks from the rear main seal and the input shaft seal.

Have you over packed the pilot bush with grease maybe and it's spewing out onto the flywheel (doubtful)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tilton clutch was s/h and had no thrust bearing so just re used the one from the nismo g max a smaller version which I was told was the correct one.

hmmm yippee box out clutch to ACS hopefully they can shed some light

gotta get this fixed soon I wanna see how the 2530 goes on the 2.4lt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
×
×
  • Create New...