Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok

are rb20 / 25 / 26 clutches all interchangeable?

and is there something i've forgotten in the rb25 box conversion (possibly inside the bellhousing or something)?? it drives around but the clutch just slips under load!!!

...since i have done a rb25 gearbox conversion on my cefiro (rb20det) i have had issues with clutches -

firstly was a nismo gmax (2nd hand) but was working fine before conversion (blew the 20 box!!). since installing this rb25 gearbox had numerous problems getting it right - and the clutch not slipping...

NOW

i had a tilton twin plate fitted as the other clutch was slipping - and same again - minimal load / 0 boost / under 3000rpm and the clutch slips (running motor in so DEFINITELY no thrash/big load up)

had the box in and out changing things on it - changed the pivot ball to a longer one, as the clutch fork had play before and not even touching the slave cyl... but now the pin sits up on the fork nicely

cut the back of the carrier inside (i think thats what it was about 4mm) the bellhousing move it back a little as it was almost like the thrustbearing was constantly touching the fins (or front of the clutch)

the clutch pedal only has about 10-15% of the full pedal's worth that actually is being used to engage - disengage the clutch

rb25 box bolted straight up to rb20 motor - lengths were the same - gear lever comes out the transtunnel in the right spot etc...

WHAT THE HELL COULD IT BE?

Check its not leaking oil.

I had my clutch slip easily when my front input shaft seal was leaking/seeping.

I pulled off the clutch and it was a complete mess.

Replaced seal, no more slip.

But yours sounds extreme, so likely not related. :S

used a 33 slave no oil leaks thanks cubes box has been out a few times

what would be the symptoms of a incorrect type of clutch being fitted i.e the whole push pull thing

I think maybe the last two clutches put in were a different type to what was required?

Ive heard you can convert them? read it in the hpi r34 build up

are rb20 / 25 / 26 clutches all interchangeable?

only rb20, rb25 series 1, and r32 gtr

had the box in and out changing things on it - changed the pivot ball to a longer one, as the clutch fork had play before and not even touching the slave cyl... but now the pin sits up on the fork nicely

that sounds like a problem there. From memory the slave should be touching the fork whithout pressure on the pedal. I cant remember if you can just turn the pin to make it longer to take up freeplay??

cut the back of the carrier inside (i think thats what it was about 4mm) the bellhousing move it back a little as it was almost like the thrustbearing was constantly touching the fins (or front of the clutch)

i think its supposed to be....

the clutch pedal only has about 10-15% of the full pedal's worth that actually is being used to engage -disengage the clutch

have you got under the dash to lenghten the master cylinder rod to adjust the pedal?

rb25 box bolted straight up to rb20 motor - lengths were the same - gear lever comes out the transtunnel in the right spot etc...

did you change bearing carrier over when you changed the clutches? make sure you have the right one in. This can stuff the clutch...

Edited by Bl4cK32

thanks for the info guys

BTW - it is a series 1 rb25 gearbox also so that should be ok.

and could it be possible that the master cylinder (changed to 33 slave cylinder) would need to be changed also?

Bl4ck 32

- so how can you tell what the clutch is meant for what type of motor?

- have changed to a longer pivot ball and slave pin was sitting on the fork not too much but but still applying some tension

- ok :blink:

- does this need to be changed with a standard clutch replacement also?

- the thrustbearings where changed previously with the old nismo gmax clutch, and it is still the same one - smaller than standard - that is being used on this tilton twin plate

thanks

-matt

anyone else have any ideas???

was either thinking of replacing with a stock rb20det clutch just to see if that drives ok - then it will tell us if its either the wrong clutch (the twin plate) for the rb20det / rb25det gearbox setup; OR its in the actual motor/box setup :S

It appears you have fiddled with a couple of things that really shouldn't be fiddled with, as we do from time to time. :P

- have changed to a longer pivot ball and slave pin was sitting on the fork not too much but but still applying some tension

Return it to standard, run the standard fork, pivot ball and slave cylinder.

Standard everything.

- the thrustbearings where changed previously with the old nismo gmax clutch, and it is still the same one - smaller than standard - that is being used on this tilton twin plate

I believe this is where your problems stem from.

Get the correct thrustbearing for the clutch, don't try to fit one that is not designed for the use as it will stuff the clutch as what happened to bl4ck32's os twin plate when jms fitted/bodged it up to mattr's car.

Bl4ck32, Who was it that sorted out the thrust bearing for your clutch when it went in for balancing with the motor?

thanks cubes

yep i am running standard fork / slave to suit the rb25 box had to change the pivot pall as we originally had the standard one in there and it wasnt long enough and the fork had exess play/movement

the thrustbearing also it could be i guess, but just using the ones that were given when buying the nismo clutch (NOW using the tilton twin plate)

i'm really leaning to stocking the clutch out / and stock thrustbearing / pivot ball just to see if it drives A OK and doesnt slip at least this would then eliminate either problem with 'BOX' or 'CLUTCH'...

and if it is ok with stocker maybe buy a single plate 6 puck new... at least then there'll be no issues with it

-----

BL4ck32 i am interested to hear more about the thrustbearing issue also

thanks

-Matt

Slip has nothing else to do other than the clutch.

If you have had to play with the pivot its 100% completely obvious using the old thrust bearing setup is 100% not suitable.

Generally when you buy a clutch they come with a thrust bearing.

Every clutch I have bought has. :D

Grab the suitable thrust bearing that should have came with the clutch, throw in the origional pivot and it will work a.ok.

spoken to a couple more people and have also been told that in some cases you need to get an alternative carrier (from another rb25) as some are longer than others...

person i talked to - had same symptoms as mine - just load it up and it would slip - changed the carrier to a shorter one and it was A OK!...

:S i'm getting a headache...

I think they sent my twin plate to Xtreme clutch and they said it had the wrong thrust bearing carrier with it, and thats what may have damaged the clutch (bent metal plates).

I agree with cubes, set it up as per std -std pivot, fork, and slave. Master can stay as rb20 item. Find out the right carrier to go with that clutch for the rb25 box. Then fit the twin and u should be right.

Changing to a shorter carrier may not be the answer. U need to find what length for that clutch in that box.

Bl4ck32,

I noticed with the new clutch I had fitted the thrust bearing sat noticably forward on the carrier compared to the previous fairly std organic clutch.

I've noted the same with heavy duty clutches in the VS and previous cars.

My guess is, if your OS clutch was bought new to suit an RB25 it would simply come with a thrust bearing, no carier.

That thrust bearing would sit in the correct position on the std carrier in order achieve the correct positioning on the rb25.

Unless its impossible for the given clutch setup to use the std carrier with a specific thrust bearing.

That does sound unlikely as there's nothing special about a carrier that simple modification (when manufacturing) of the thrust bearing couldn't sort out.

Which brings me back to Huddy's problem... Were you given the option to purchase the suitable thrust bearing with your clutch?

It may be possible the clutch has been designed around the std rb25 thrust bearing. I find this unlikely as its easier/cheaper/quicker to make a generic clutch that works in all applications for say an 8" clutch, then use the thrust bearings positioning to achieve the movement required to engage/disengage the clutch.

As you stated you are running the nismo thrust bearing that is smaller and different to standard obviously throwing another spanner in the works.

Get on to Tilton and find out where you can obtain a thurst bearing suitable for an R33 Series 1 RB25DET Push type gearbox.

If they say use the std item.. you beauty. :D

damn back to my pl/sql home work. :D

I've run into similar problems before, the first was when i snapped a diaphram in half on my old os twin plate, which i later found out was due to the stock carrier being longer than the os carrier. I didn't receive the carrier as i got the clutch s/h and didn't know any better. I also ran a stock type thrust bearing.

The second issue is probably more relevant to your question, which was also with the os clutch, was when i swapped master cylinders. I would have had a week wait for an r32 one from nissan, and they had an s14 one in stock so i got that seeing as i had a friend who had used one successfully. The problem was that it didn't have enough travel when installed into the 32 with my setup and so maintained pressure in the system, which when everything got hot (like sitting in traffic) it would just slip like a mofo as the expanding fluid caused the slave to push the fork a bit. I'm pretty certain that it was this situation that actually contributed the most to the failure of the clutch in the end.

The obvious check for that one is to see if you can push the slave cylinder back by hand when the pedal is up. It should move in with very little effort.

I found later that my friends car was also maintaining pressure in the system but as he was only running a single plate there was enough room to move that it didn't start pressing on the fingers.

I am assuming it's something like this as you have already checked for obvious leaks from the rear main seal and the input shaft seal.

Have you over packed the pilot bush with grease maybe and it's spewing out onto the flywheel (doubtful)?

tilton clutch was s/h and had no thrust bearing so just re used the one from the nismo g max a smaller version which I was told was the correct one.

hmmm yippee box out clutch to ACS hopefully they can shed some light

gotta get this fixed soon I wanna see how the 2530 goes on the 2.4lt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...