Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Matt this is really going to be a trial and error procedure. However my guess is that the used bearing carrier is too long, and is continually applying the thrust bearing to the pressure plate. Therefore the clutch is not seeing 100% of the clamping force which is allowing to "slip" when the engine in making power. If this is the case go see a clutch specialist they will sort you out.

However as BHDave has stated if there is any grease or oil that may have contacted the flywheel this may be the cause of the problem. As soon as there is a "liquid" lubricant comes in contact with the clutch face, it's a death sentence. I strongly recommend that when installing the carrier bearing to use graphite powder rather then grease, this will not affect the clutch in anyway.

No matter what the problem I strongly discourage you from driving the vehicle until you have solved the problem. If you glaze the clutch plate(s) you might as well throw the item in the bin.

the saga continues :S

going to take it down tomorrow and trial with a different (shorter carrier) also - as i have heard from other pple that this does make a difference

ALSO that rb20 box carriers are interchangable ? :S guess i'll find that one out...lol...

i totally agree with u bigsully - but its only slipping in 4th and 5th gear atm as i'm running no boost / no load/ under 3000rpm (running in new rings and bearings) BUT its not a daily car so just down to the workshop.

*sighs...

When I did my conversion. The only things that were changed was the slave. Same pressure plate, replacement fly wheel, and new rb20 clutch with all those new bearings and stuff. I also got a few new seals on the box just to be on the safe side. Mine works fine, can chirp 5th (which I didnt mean to do, but it can do it! so it aint slipping).

So Id do what the others are saying, and go back to stock stuff.

Bl4ck32,

I noticed with the new clutch I had fitted the thrust bearing sat noticably forward on the carrier compared to the previous fairly std organic clutch.

I've noted the same with heavy duty clutches in the VS and previous cars.

My guess is, if your OS clutch was bought new to suit an RB25 it would simply come with a thrust bearing, no carier.

That thrust bearing would sit in the correct position on the std carrier in order achieve the correct positioning on the rb25.

Unless its impossible for the given clutch setup to use the std carrier with a specific thrust bearing.

That does sound unlikely as there's nothing special about a carrier that simple modification (when manufacturing) of the thrust bearing couldn't sort out.

yer when i gave them my twin plate, i also gave them the thrust bearing/ and carrier. They said both were the wrong ones, and supplied a new bearing+carrier for about $40 i think it was. I installed the clutch, fit the new carrier and fork, and havent had any troubles with the setup apart from the shagged master which ive replaced since :(

$40??? thats awesome was going to trial a different carrier tomorrow but i may do what you did and take my existing carrier down with the clutch and the thrustbearing and see what they say... sorry i forgot did u say you had a twin plate? OS ? if so did they just give you the equivalent thrustbearing to match?

thanks

-Matt

hey dude did ya machine the flywheel when ya changed the clutch? I did the same thing a while back.. kept blowing the crappy lashy 20 box. I put a 25 box in and new clutch.. Got lazy, and i didnt bother getting the flywheel machined for the life of that clutch it just slipped and fried every time on boost...

O K - well had the clutch checked out turns out it was buggered :S now i am running the new xtreme 'drift' clutch with thrustbearing provided, have just done 900km's and its not slipping!!! so this means motor is now run in also :wave::(

BUT - i was told that once the clutch is worn in the fork will want to move toward the slave moreso :S and that i didnt have enough play in the fork atm (so need a shorter pivot ball) . like i said, just done 900km's and its not slipping... has anyone else heard anything like this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haven’t had the chance to drive it yet with work being a nightmare, will definitely be doing that at some point this week. got these so that grip won’t be an issue at roll racing  
    • The cross sectional area of a circular hole scales with the square of diameter. So a 2mm diameter hole is 4x the area of a 1mm hole. Not double. The 1.7mm hole is nearly 3x the area of a 1mm hole. You do not need restrictors at both ends of the oil supply line. If you have new, additional restrictors at the turbo end, that you did not have before, then you do not need a restrictor at the inlet end.
    • Hi all. Been a while but things are moving along. I just have something that I am wondering about. Since I will use OEM turbo oil pumbing, I got myself a new bolt, the one that goes into the engine block oil feed. As I recall (and see visually) this bolt comes restricted with I think a 1.7mm hole? Not quite sure but it was something around that size. The turbos have 1mm restrictor bolts installed, as necessary due to ball bearings and my higher oil pressures. Can I now just use that OEM bolt with the 1.7mm hole in for the engine block or will this actually be too much oil flow restriction and I have to drill it out first? In my head it would make sense for the bolt to be at least 2mm wide as both turbos take "1mm of oil flow". Do let me know if my logic is flawed here, I just want to make sure I don't kill my turbo bearings with too little oil. Don't know if I can trust the saying I read somewhere that ball bearing turbos essentially only need an oil mist
    • There are several aftermarket options available, from not-too-painful moneyhttps://justjap.com/collections/driveshafts-bearings/products/d-max-reinforced-replacement-rear-driveshaft-set-fits-nissan-s13-s14-s15-r32-r33-r34-c35 and  https://justjap.com/products/crank-motorsport-billet-rear-axles-fits-nissan-skyline-r33-gts-t-r34-gt-t?srsltid=AfmBOorQk4xkGUa98kO7v2ePLUiNt-HRrM2AwWNw9mbSIVE1ujBVwY__, all the way up to The Driveshaft Shop https://driveshaftshop.com/skyline-cv-axles/
    • Yeah based on old XRC5964S specs, it looks to be roughly GTX3576R sized? But this 5964S compressor will flow 90lb airflow somewhat similar to the compressors in both the GTX3584RS or G35-1050.. I fully expected the 0.64 rear A/R to choke up top - seems way too small from typical convention - but these are seemingly beneficial over the prior 0.82 results.. Be interesting to see if he comments on the EFR question in that thread - he mentioned in a prior video that BW EFR's were the "cats pajamas 10 years ago", but by the sounds of things all his kits have been using Xona for quite a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...