Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 Owners, What Rpm At 100km/h?


Recommended Posts

hey all,

long time owner, new time driver >_< - so just making sure my car is going ok and everything...

Just wondering what other manual, turbo, R34 owners cars are revving at when doing 100kph?

My car seems to be around 2700 - 2800rpm, more 2800rpm... i thought it was a little high??

No modifications at all except splitfire coilpacks...

is this a normal rpm for 100kph?

cheers,

daniel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey all,

long time owner, new time driver >_< - so just making sure my car is going ok and everything...

Just wondering what other manual, turbo, R34 owners cars are revving at when doing 100kph?

My car seems to be around 2700 - 2800rpm, more 2800rpm... i thought it was a little high??

No modifications at all except splitfire coilpacks...

is this a normal rpm for 100kph?

cheers,

daniel

that's about right. i've got an r34 gt-t with no mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah man, this is 2nd gear.... my car go do 350km/hr!

yeah, yeah, 5th gear.... thought it was a little high that's all, 2800rpm..

and on that token... is it silly to use 5th gear when doing 60kph? i'm thinking purely from a fuel economy point of view. in that the less the rpm, the less petrol being used? But wasn't sure how good it was to drive at 60kph in 5th, at about 1700-1800 rpm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it might be ok, if you rollin down a hill or something??

but i usually put it in 5th around 60.. But most of the time i have to shift back to 4th..

I would like to know as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mines Auto and its about 2800 revs at 100Ks

I thought it seemed a little high to but it must be normal as everyone else is the same.

nothing wrong with 5th at 60Ks as long as you aint going up a hill and putting to much strain on the gearbox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read something today about fuel economy. They recon moving to a higher gear as early as possible, and 5th in 60 should be ok. But then its all about gear ratios i guess, so it changes on a vehicle to vehicle basis. I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It revs at about 2700RPM at 100 for mine.

Yeah i reckon 5th gear in 60km/h is a little too low. At 60km/h, 4th gear is revving at about 2400 if i'm not wrong? That should be fine in terms of fuel consumption

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my mates 34 revs at just under 3k from memory too, which i thought seemed a little high too, but i guess not. 5th at 60km/hr might even be worse for fuel econemy, if you've only got very light throttle, then ok, but even on a slight uphill, or accelerating from 60km/hr, then there'd be so much load that you'd use heaps of fuel, where as downshifting and revving a little bit harder while ur closer to the meat of the torqu curve, u will use less fuel. thats the theory side of it that i was taught, probly all a load of sh*t tho lol :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think mine revs @ about 2800 at 100kph too. it does almost exactly 3000 at 120kph. it's a reasonably short diff in the GT-T's huh.

there's probably some way to work it out with diff and gear ratios....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mines auto R33 and I find that when the car has not warmed up properly it sits on around 2900-3000 RPM, once it has warmed up it drops to as far as 2,600 RPM.

The revs drop when the torque converter locks up. When driving an auto you should try and notice when the converter locks unlocks and attempt to drive with the converter locked as often as possible, this will lead to very good economy.

Edited by DennisRB30
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I read something today about fuel economy. They recon moving to a higher gear as early as possible, and 5th in 60 should be ok. But then its all about gear ratios i guess, so it changes on a vehicle to vehicle basis. I guess.

better fuel economy in 5th unless u are trying to accelerate or goin uphill.. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i only sift up to 5th wen im going 80......i woulda thought 5th gear in 60 puts to much wait on the car.......what revs does it sit on when going 60 in 5th?

these are my shists

2nd at 20kph

3rd at 40kph

4th at 60

5th at 80

thats for cruising.....

we all know what we go up to in other occasions hahaha

Edited by anjoO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...