Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just redone my light/moderate load ign. and afr's...

Should be interesting next tank, the ignition has actually made quite a difference to how the car feels off idle, prior accelerating from a standing start in second would have it bog for a fraction of a second, now it simply accelerates without bogging. :D

I've got a real strange issue around 2000rpm as the turbo tries to make more than a few psi, it appears to bog, boost goes up, afr reading goes way lean then as soon as it gets over 2000rpm it clears its throat and acceleartion literally snaps on.

I'm assuming this may have some thing to do with the n/a cams running around 8degree's overlap and such a small turbo.

Nothing I do will get rid of it, super rich afr's, lots or little ignition timing or a mixture... Buggers me.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Question... i have rb20 wit z32 afm/gtr injectors and im gettin 300ish kms to a tank, i had standard injectors and afm and got around the same, isn't that abit sh*t for an rb20?? I would like some fuel economy but if i cant have some decent hp and economy, well i did buy a car with a turbo n id understand lol Ive just seen some figures off rb20s and even rb25s that blow me away, even with i baby the motor!

Edited by jazza08

Its all about maintaince, I'd also have to say (in my case) it doesn't have so much to do with tuning as on the base pfc maps with z32 and gtr injectors & the 3ltr I was pushing 440km's per tank.

The only time i've dropped to such fuel economy levels is when my injectors were shagged, the o2 sensor was still ok but definitely a tad slower than the new genuine o2 sensor I replaced it with.

So as I believe I've said before...

Check for vacuum leaks, ensure o2 sensor and injectors are in good condition and motor in good condition.

And drive sensibly, short shift around 2500rpm and use a little more throttle to get the car moving, driving like this its also critical your tuner doesn't have the afr's dropping to flat 12's as soon as any boost is made.

From factory my rb20det driving as such would hang in closed loop until roughly 2psi was being made, so it was running lean, possibly why it consistently returned just under 500km's to a tank.

But as with everything there are bad cars and good ones... Its just finding what is causing the problem. R33's suffer the poor fuel economy problems much more often than the R32's, its not displacement as I've noticed no real noticable difference and i'm 1ltr over a 2ltr. :)

  • 7 years later...

Most of you guys are getting good economy! My 25/30 is running 19/100km no matter how I drive.

That's on a 25 tune @5psi. On the wideband it shows 14.5-15.8 in closed loop but gets right up to 11.1 at wot.

Will hopefully get better when I get my pfc and sard 800cc fitted and tuned.

I think the roads to good economy are CR injectors and gearing . An RB30 with at LEAST 9.5 static CR should make real good part throttle torque . I also think good injectors like EV14s help heaps because they have fine control (if tuned properly) at short pulse widths .

Most R series Skylines were geared to suit the std RB20/25/26 and Japanese roads , depending on the lump you removed the gearing can be pretty short for a 3 litre . I don't think any turbo R series was taller diff wise than 4.1 and a 3.9 would allow you to better use the extra part throttle torque . Note the difference in rear gearing between some JDM and some Aus spec S series cars , 4.1 to 3.7 in one case from memory .

Lastly and very importantly , turbine back pressure . If the turbine/housing combination is small this hurts consumption too .

A .

I think the roads to good economy are CR injectors and gearing . An RB30 with at LEAST 9.5 static CR should make real good part throttle torque . I also think good injectors like EV14s help heaps because they have fine control (if tuned properly) at short pulse widths .

Most R series Skylines were geared to suit the std RB20/25/26 and Japanese roads , depending on the lump you removed the gearing can be pretty short for a 3 litre . I don't think any turbo R series was taller diff wise than 4.1 and a 3.9 would allow you to better use the extra part throttle torque . Note the difference in rear gearing between some JDM and some Aus spec S series cars , 4.1 to 3.7 in one case from memory .

Lastly and very importantly , turbine back pressure . If the turbine/housing combination is small this hurts consumption too .

A .

That's why I am still looking for an R34 GTR non v spec diff (3.545) not just for the fuel economy but more for more restful cruising at 110km/hr

Nick, isn't your in a patrol? The extra weight would make a huge difference.

I am getting just over 13 driving to and from work mostly (12ks each way) with my auto rwd Stagea. I have been meaning for ages to tweak all of the cruise section of my tune but still haven't.

800s because they come up cheap, New still sealed in box's for $200.

If something better Sized shows up for sale I'll get them, I really only wanted bigger than stock- like 400-500cc

Yeah it's in a patrol, on 35s and 6in lift so she's pretty aerodynamic!

And it has 4.94 diffs.

It does 2550rpm at 100km.

And it weighs 2200kg, probably bit more with a full tank.

Edited by nicksamaniac

Why are you getting Sard 800 injectors? They won't help your economy. Are you going for 500KW?

500Kw at least!

I want to be able to lift a wheel whilst overtaking at 100km/hr!

But more seriously I was just gonna put it on the Dyno and lean on it (to a safe enough level) and see what it makes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...