Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So pauls appears to have a problem with the top end reading flat then...

Compare it to something else..

Maybe this one I've attached that obviously doesn't have something strange going on with a flat top end.

page 4 about 1/4 way down.

im aware of the top end dropping off. its always been there.

so how is the rest of the tune shit. how are the cruise afr's shit

how is the low cruise IGN timing shit. how is the max load ign timing shit

well if you pulled your head out your arse for a second, and read what i said before, i was making a general comment, not specifically talking about you. and you aren't the only one making approx 180kw on a pfc. maybe you all go to the same tuner and he is crap. maybe you did it yourself and you should've taken it to a professional. there are people out there who can tune better than others.

if you have a flat spot of about 1000rpm it means you have some sort of issue. it may not been in the tune, but it is somewhere. maybe i have a better flowing exhaust, or turbo in better condition, but there is something that mine has that yours doesn't to give it that extra 1000rpm worth of power.

Edited by mad082

i have read what you said, several times. and i have seen the comments by cubes. both of which i have read and understood. the car hasn't been to the same place, its been to 3 different places and i have done some touch up tuning myself, mainly advance some timing here or there and lean out the afr's more for better economy.

so now you think its the turbo or something else causing the lack of power? are you sure? which one is it? its the same in your case. the ecu isnt the only thing that makes power. perhapps something else in your car is different

anyway

im over it

im happy with my ecu and tune, you keep your stock ecu tune and keep ranting about it making the same power. we're both happy

i was simply saying possible causes for your flat curve since it has always been there. and for the millionth time, i'm not keeping the ecu, it is getting upgraded. i never said an aftermarket ecu was bad, just that bolting one in doesn't automatically give it more power than a stock ecu. and if the person tuning it doesn't have a clue then it could end up worse than a stock ecu.

I wouldn't feel completely safe running around with yours Mad, afr's are obviously on the 'edge' definitely not something the thread OP wants. Dirty fuel filter = leaner again, fuel pump that decides no more = leaner again. Definitely not safe.

Have yours tuned with safe afr's and you will most likely find your back down with the rest of them, 190-200rwkw.

BUT you WILL pick up mid range and off boost power.

On your dyno that may make it look like yours has more mid range over others, jump on another and it will be the same as the others.

So sure 200rwkw 'can' be done with a select few R33's with ecu's that don't freak out and R&R all over the place.

Generally series 1.5, well I knew of one R33 Series 1.5 that was a freak and cracked 200rwkw, I know of 4 others that had fuel cuts and R&R topping out at 178rwkw. So not everything is equal.

I think you will find its generally not the tuner that gets low power out puts its the variables involved.

Engine condition, turbo type (series 1, 2 etc), how the car is tyed down, inlet temp sensor position and finally how the dyno reads. Its not uncommon to have a dyno read 10rwkw different.

With regards to pauls strange top end, thats not a tuning issue, its most likely something stupid.

Have you found out why it was doing that yet Paul?

it is a series 2 motor. series 1.5 car i have seen a few of the 1.5's with series 2 motors.. i asked how the afr's were since they wouldn't give me them and they said the were ok, but could be improved. there were rich in some areas, lean in others.

and i understand that different dyno's pull different powers, but i'm 25hp up on another r33 in town with same mods (except the adjustments we made) (same dyno, same day), so obviously i've done something right.

my afr's are on my dyno sheets

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/pics/dyno/...r33-193rwkw.jpg

the tune has been alterted slightly, i have throw in a stack load more timing in the low end 8x8 area

and also cranked out the cuirse afr's in the 8x8 area to get some super economy. there is also on avg a 2deg increase on the ign map everywhere.

the top end we arent sure why it dies off. ive looked at it, a tuner has and we can't figure it out

its a series 2 with 150,000 on the clock. the top off dying has always been there, since day one when i got the car 50,000 with stock ecu

what exhaust setup do you have? it may be something isn't flowing well enough to let the gases escape fast enough so it is just backing up. generally a poorly flowing exhaust won't be able to cope at high rpm. or do you have a partitioned pod?

Edited by mad082

Maybe a little more fuel with a little more ignition timing gave better results than less fuel less ignition timing.

Nothing wrong with 193rwkw anyway.. I'd say its the norm for the dyno I run on at least.

That 211rwkw dyno sheet was a bit of a freak run.. :P It made 187rwkw on the same dyno another day. probably just tied down different or something. lol hehehe

Comapring pauls dyno sheet to a few other rb25's here paul has more average power everywhere. 130km/h is pretty impressive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...