Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

okai we all know a turbo back might be better but is it value for money? just looking at the prices of some turbo back systems or even getting a cat back and then buying seperate items to form a full system is just so pricey ($1300+)

could someone tell me exxactly how much u benifiet from a turbo back compared to a cat back.

oh and also what are the best kind of exhausts out there these days....ive seen some of the ones where u can mute the sound of the exhaust with a flick of a switch or something?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118587-turbo-back-vs-cat-back/
Share on other sites

Getting a cat back and a pod let my car breath so much better, you really notice the response. That was good but the ECU wasnt up to the task and so I now have modded more and more and I still havent stopped, I plan on getting more soon, should I stop? Do I need proffessional help? I cant stop, when will it end, do i regret it ? NEVER!!

Answer this question -

"What is the restriction to the exhaust flow from the valves back."

Obviously the Turbo Turbine wheel is first but that makes the boost we all crave so if we allow the turbine wheel to get rid of the gasses as easily as possible it will operate a lot more efficently.

The next restriction in a standard system is the actual dump pipe it self in the restricted diameter and shape.

After that problem the major restriction is the CAT itself (Which we cant remove if we have any sense at all)

So after all this, you want to put some larger pipe on the least restrictive part of the system??

Sorry, but it just seems so obvious to me....

I've just fitted a Trust cat-back to my R34 and I've noticed slightly better topend, not much more except for the greater exhaust note. When I changed the dump/front pipe (turbo to cat) on the GTIR which already had a cat-back was massive, alot more then when I changed just the catback on the R34.

Think of it this way using the simple straw/hose theory, you've got a straw at the beginning of the source of water and at half way the straw suddenly becomes the size of a hose. Even though the pipe has now become bigger the flow of water is still restricted at the beginning.

If however its the other way around - hose from the start then suddenly is restricted to a straw, this doesn't sound too good does it? :D

In other words - do the whole turbo-back if you can afford it. If not do the cat-back first then save up for the rest of the exhaust (bigger cat, dump and front pipe) but I personally wouldn't do the dump/front first and have the stock restrictive cat-back.

Looks like TurboX said most of what I planned to right before me. :D

Regarding what exhaust to get: try look for a Jap catback mainly for bolt on issues. Or try going second hand R33 cat-back and then get an exhaust shop to mod it to fit. This is what I did, the R33 cat-back was abit too long but everything else was perfect fit after the longer part was cut. (This is for R34 by the way)

For the dump and front, can't go past BATMBL's dump and front pipe combinations. Look to be of great quality and has most things covered: at least 30cm before the split is rejoined up, pre heat coated, and fixed up the O2 sensor fittings I believe.

Turbo X, I half agree with you.

The dump is a total pos. It is the most restrictive piece of junk in the world - mainly in the shape - how the wastegate gasses are 'jammed' back into the exhaust stream at 90 degree angle.

The front pipe is 'OK' that is, probably not too much of a restriciton for the stock turbo. It's got fairly nice bends and designed quiet well.

The cat is a pos. Very restrictive.

The catback is also quite a pos too. It has poor bends, too many mufflers and furthermore, the mufflers are a poor design. If you cut one open, inside it is really nasty.

1300 isn't that expensive. If you even want to consider doing any other performance mods, i'd finish the exhaust.

Dont worry about buying a brand spanking new system, pick up a used one if its in good condition and you'll save yourself a heap! My car had cat back, so i bought a second hand 3inch dump/front pipe that just jap are selling. Picked it up for $90 and it was pretty much brand new.

Edited by Mr Italy!

I did my own review back in 2003 when I had my R33 GTS-t. I can't find the dyno graph right now (to many pics to browse through) but you can read my old review here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=10567&hl=

okai we all know a turbo back might be better but is it value for money? just looking at the prices of some turbo back systems or even getting a cat back and then buying seperate items to form a full system is just so pricey ($1300+)

could someone tell me exxactly how much u benifiet from a turbo back compared to a cat back.

oh and also what are the best kind of exhausts out there these days....ive seen some of the ones where u can mute the sound of the exhaust with a flick of a switch or something?

When I first got my car it had a cat back system installing a highflow cat and 3" dump made a big difference

When I first got my car it had a cat back system installing a highflow cat and 3" dump made a big difference

Hey mate. i got a turbo back zorst with mild steel, and stainless steel cannon and stainless high flow cat from just jap for about 700 bux. gets delivered to melb in a day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...