Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes yes, but no no, not really, its the same difference, but DOTARS would be the place to go, they issue the import licences.

Apollogies to Ska for plagiarism.

Edited by 66yostagea
yes yes, but no no, not really, its the same difference, but DOTARS would be the place to go, they issue the import licences.

Apollogies to Ska for plagiarism.

he he he raws/dotars/sevs/etc you all know what i meant :D

ok guys and gals. just a little mike survey here lol

how many stageas are ther in the land of oz

Simple, there are 4 licence holders, they each get 100 licenses every year, this is the third year with Stageas on the list. So ;

4 X 100 X 3 = 1200

:no: cheers :)

Simple, there are 4 licence holders, they each get 100 licenses every year, this is the third year with Stageas on the list. So ;

4 X 100 X 3 = 1200

:) cheers :rolleyes:

the 4 licence holder also have other cars on there raws and the maximum you can comply is a 100 total split between all models on there schedule ...i doubt if any compliance holder has done 100 per year of 1 car ..nizmo for example have 32/33/34 /35 and stagea and total allocation is 100

my information is that approx 200 stagea`s(end of 2005) have been complied under raws scheme

the 4 licence holder also have other cars on there raws and the maximum you can comply is a 100 total split between all models on there schedule ...i doubt if any compliance holder has done 100 per year of 1 car ..nizmo for example have 32/33/34 /35 and stagea and total allocation is 100

my information is that approx 200 stagea`s(end of 2005) have been complied under raws scheme

Hmm, when I asked Ernie to comply my Stagea in May 2004 he told me he had almost exhausted his quota of Stageas. At the same time I spoke to 2 other Stagea compliers and they both had used all of their allocation. At the time I took that to mean they had done their 100 Stageas, otherwise they could have simply transferred from other cars to Stageas. Which would have made good business sense as Stagea compliance at the time was more expensive than any of the Skyline models.

:P cheers :P

"Hmm, when I asked Ernie to comply my Stagea in May 2004 he told me he had almost exhausted his quota of Stageas."

go to here..raws

put your plate # in ...change the last 3 # till it dosen`t exist and you will find out how many cars have been complied by the raws who complied your own car

nizmo have complied 114 stageas total in three years according to dotars

and three others have complied 173 in total and 1 by newest plate holder

so the total complied according to dotars is 288

I swear they must all be in W.A ... I am starting to see them everywhere over here, used to be once in a blue moon I would see one, now I see on average 1 or 2 a week....

As for compliance, I think you will find they are still making more doing Stagea's then skyline's... we are paying through the nose to do compliance on ours....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...