Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes yes, but no no, not really, its the same difference, but DOTARS would be the place to go, they issue the import licences.

Apollogies to Ska for plagiarism.

Edited by 66yostagea
yes yes, but no no, not really, its the same difference, but DOTARS would be the place to go, they issue the import licences.

Apollogies to Ska for plagiarism.

he he he raws/dotars/sevs/etc you all know what i meant :D

ok guys and gals. just a little mike survey here lol

how many stageas are ther in the land of oz

Simple, there are 4 licence holders, they each get 100 licenses every year, this is the third year with Stageas on the list. So ;

4 X 100 X 3 = 1200

:no: cheers :)

Simple, there are 4 licence holders, they each get 100 licenses every year, this is the third year with Stageas on the list. So ;

4 X 100 X 3 = 1200

:) cheers :rolleyes:

the 4 licence holder also have other cars on there raws and the maximum you can comply is a 100 total split between all models on there schedule ...i doubt if any compliance holder has done 100 per year of 1 car ..nizmo for example have 32/33/34 /35 and stagea and total allocation is 100

my information is that approx 200 stagea`s(end of 2005) have been complied under raws scheme

the 4 licence holder also have other cars on there raws and the maximum you can comply is a 100 total split between all models on there schedule ...i doubt if any compliance holder has done 100 per year of 1 car ..nizmo for example have 32/33/34 /35 and stagea and total allocation is 100

my information is that approx 200 stagea`s(end of 2005) have been complied under raws scheme

Hmm, when I asked Ernie to comply my Stagea in May 2004 he told me he had almost exhausted his quota of Stageas. At the same time I spoke to 2 other Stagea compliers and they both had used all of their allocation. At the time I took that to mean they had done their 100 Stageas, otherwise they could have simply transferred from other cars to Stageas. Which would have made good business sense as Stagea compliance at the time was more expensive than any of the Skyline models.

:P cheers :P

"Hmm, when I asked Ernie to comply my Stagea in May 2004 he told me he had almost exhausted his quota of Stageas."

go to here..raws

put your plate # in ...change the last 3 # till it dosen`t exist and you will find out how many cars have been complied by the raws who complied your own car

nizmo have complied 114 stageas total in three years according to dotars

and three others have complied 173 in total and 1 by newest plate holder

so the total complied according to dotars is 288

I swear they must all be in W.A ... I am starting to see them everywhere over here, used to be once in a blue moon I would see one, now I see on average 1 or 2 a week....

As for compliance, I think you will find they are still making more doing Stagea's then skyline's... we are paying through the nose to do compliance on ours....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...