Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys.

Well i willbe getting my car as soon as i get back form europe in 3 months, but am looking into getting things ordered before i go away so i don't have to wait when i get back.

My question is, for all those who have a PFC, do you use it as your main guage, ie use it to read boost pressure, knock, AFR, ect. or do you still have the guages to go with it. I want my car to look stock i don't particuraly like many guages, so hence why i am asking.

My other option is to not get the PFC and simply get a SAFCII and some basic guages and hide them away somehere.

Which way to go. How accurate is the PFC at boost pressure ext, do you require anyhtign extra to read boost with a PFC.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119081-apexi-pfc-or-not/
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

Well i willbe getting my car as soon as i get back form europe in 3 months, but am looking into getting things ordered before i go away so i don't have to wait when i get back.

My question is, for all those who have a PFC, do you use it as your main guage, ie use it to read boost pressure, knock, AFR, ect. or do you still have the guages to go with it. I want my car to look stock i don't particuraly like many guages, so hence why i am asking.

My other option is to not get the PFC and simply get a SAFCII and some basic guages and hide them away somehere.

Which way to go. How accurate is the PFC at boost pressure ext, do you require anyhtign extra to read boost with a PFC.

Thanks

I reckon a PFC would be fine for gauges. I just used it and the stock GTR ones and I was fine.

For boost on the PFC you will have to have the Apexi Boost Controller that plugs into it, otherwise the PFC has no idea what you're boosting at.

Edited by berzerkled

If you want a good guage display you can get a blitz R-VIT.

Will show basics- speed, water temp, rpm.. no boost unfortunatley, but will also show ignition timing, injector duty, 02 sensor, with peak levels and audible/visual warning limits, data recording and will decode any errors from the ecu to tell you what they are. Oh and its easy as to install- just plug it into your service/consult plug, no wiring necessary!!

But guessing you're after afr/boost readings, which this doesnt do (at least not on my car)

what do u want to acheive out of the car? an SAFC + gauges is not a substitute for a PFC + hand controller. Ok cost wise maybe they are equal but not in terms of tunability. look into what u want to acheive with ur car then decide which sort of engine management system is better for u.

Well i want to get and can easily achive 250rwKw.

So im going to get a PFC and basic guages. As far as i can see all i really need is an accurate Boost Gauge, and Oil pressur guage and that's about all.

Anything else i should have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...