Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No motor is still original and strong. Great compression tests, also becausevspec r32's came with the steel turbines in the turbos, there are no leaks at all.

Had them looked at last month.

Car has only driven about 400 kms in 18 months.

bump

mate you were going good until the stupid post of bump and then the price drop.You cheapened yourself and your car.Everyone does it and its so irritating.First the spill about how you dont want to sell it,then how rare and collectable it is,then the price,then the price drop.Its just so predictable.Leave it at 38k or just write the real price you want.Now all the forum users will wait untill next week and see your next price drop and so on and so on.Thats why the ass is dropping out of the price of them.No one has the guts to name there price and wait or be patient.Ive read guys here asking 32k for gtrs and a week later its 26k.Just so stupid.We can all see it coming from the minute it goes up for sale. :dry:

Paul - For a $2000 loss, it brings it into the reach of more people, like me. What i hate is people saying "i want to sell this car" and then not budge on the price. It goes both ways. And it's up to the seller.

I need to save a bit more, but if it's still around in a few weeks, i'll be looking at it very seriously.

Will not drop the price below $36K. Have had some interest, but no genuine buyers. I can wait. Car is being advertised in Unique cars next month. If I dont sell it hear, it will sell.

NOW THATS MORE LIKE IT.BEST OF LUCK.

No motor is still original and strong. Great compression tests, also becausevspec r32's came with the steel turbines in the turbos, there are no leaks at all.

Had them looked at last month.

Car has only driven about 400 kms in 18 months.

No interest in buying (I already have enough Skylines) but just to clarify for possible buyers who may be misled. V-specs never in any model had steel turbine wheels, but have ceramic turbines, and are therefore just as likely to fail without notice as non V-spec. N1's in 32 and 33 have steel wheels and 34 N1's have Inconel turbines and ball bearing centres. That said, good luck with the sale

Nick, this is not about discussion but false advertisement. Anyone who has been on here a while knows only N1 turbos have steel or inconel turbines as stock fitment. There is no difference between standard and V-spec turbos on the different models.

Enjoy your reading KBNR32.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...GTR*+R32*++N1**

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...GTR*+R32*++N1**

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=71939&hl=

So you are quoting yourself. All correct except the turbos mate. Again, good luck on the sale but be honest on the turbos.

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/docs/discu...n1-vs-stock.txt

Maybe you can post the turbo part numbers.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...