Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For what reason do they wish they hadnt?

They werent as good as the tales made them out to be, and as such the fuel guzzling the excessive insurence and the frequent breaking didnt make it worth while

They werent as good as the tales made them out to be, and as such the fuel guzzling the excessive insurence and the frequent breaking didnt make it worth while

Are they that bad on fuel? not that it matters when you have a fuel car you are allowed to use on your own car!!!

hey hey bishes...

hey there isaac!!!

Are they that bad on fuel? not that it matters when you have a fuel car you are allowed to use on your own car!!!

off boost i got 620k's from 65ltrs, no idea what its like on boost...but my old gts-t was 380k's driving mainly off boost

It isnt the road going version of the LM car. The homogolation version was the ugly silver RWD thing you win in GT4 that looked alot like this

Frankys car was built to celebrate the sucess of that other car, and in my opinion it is much nicer :)

Why the plenum? The stock is good for around 300rwkw. The short runners will make you loose bottom end and in many cases power all over the range. Not the thing you want with a highflow (The bottom end losing that is) Because that is where its strengths lie.

The info I got (and subsequently offered as an explanation) appeared in Japanese Performamce mag issue 47 (Dec 2004). Here's a snippet of the article --->> CLICKY

If you want, you can also still buy the magazine here --->> CLICKY

so basically its a single turbo 2.7 gtr?

im just reading of that link karen supplied

The article relates to a specific vehicle (ie the 2.7, single turbo) but makes references to the standard LM models which were released. Tjose were the sections I was referring to. :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...