Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

*punches shane* coz he told me too

*punches shane again* for talking abour supras.

supras are well setup cars and their engines are even better, even a nissan driver can admit that.

what he said, except if its stock from a supra, its going to be twin turbo.

Oh thats right :O It is the 1J vvti that has the single!

I would buy the 1j anyway, just because it is that bit cheaper and still a damn good engine (Pretty good match for a RB26 :blink: )

*punches shane* coz he told me too

*punches shane again* for talking abour supras.

who said its going in a supra? :happy: i've had this idea for awhile now, and i want to investigate to see if it will actually work!

So so bored. And my back is KILLING me. Stupid packing 5000 calendars :glare: Thank god i've only got half an hour to go!

too much bending over anna? :ninja:

Only ever been in one (supra james' from sydney) but it feels soooooooo comfy! Like it's totally made FOR the driver, and everyone else can get stuffed. It feels really ergonomic even!

who said its going in a supra? :happy: i've had this idea for awhile now, and i want to investigate to see if it will actually work!

too much bending over anna? :glare:

Oooo I had a new idea yesterday too, I also need to see if it is even possible!

Oooo I had a new idea yesterday too, I also need to see if it is even possible!

I reckon it'd work... and it'd be a bit more different than your current 'beast' :ninja:

the seats in supra's actually hug u like the GTR seats do.

I reckon they hug you more! And I like hugs :happy::glare:

so what's the difference between a forged (aftermarket) 1jz & same spec 2jz?

I wouldnt bother making them forged

People have pulled around 600hp from a stock bottom end onm a 1j and near enough to 800hp on a 2j

The main difference between the two is .5l of capacity...the 1j has a better head but

so what's the difference between a forged (aftermarket) 1jz & same spec 2jz?

literage, torque, a turbo (in some cases) and small amounts of power. 1j 2.5l vs 2j 3l. Not a heap of differency both are tough as nails. Put it this way if I were going to choose and I had a budget to build on the 1j would have my vote. No budget may as well buy a newer 2j motor.

forging 1j/2j's isn't necessary unless your going to put silly amounts of power through them, as I said before they are tough as nails...both engines can handle massive amounts of power on stock bottom ends.

I reckon it'd work... and it'd be a bit more different than your current 'beast' :ninja:

I reckon they hug you more! And I like hugs :happy::glare:

It needs to be one of those things that can be done from the nissan parts bin but. other wise the idea is too expensive

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...