Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Moring Ladies.....

lol i just noticed my little bro on here givin me shit...... :( he's stalking me on the forum ready with blow torch in hand..... dam it :P he thinks flaming me he will get accepted more quickly into the comunity :dry: and it prolly will :huh::D:wub:

oh u know..................

AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!

:)

lolz sure sure :P

comin to dinner tonite?

Moring Ladies.....

lol i just noticed my little bro on here givin me shit...... :( he's stalking me on the forum ready with blow torch in hand..... dam it :P he thinks flaming me he will get accepted more quickly into the comunity :dry: and it prolly will :huh::D:wub:

really, i havnt seen him post...

wats happenin fat man?

ahh i see...what u going for?

i think dan has talked me into the new hsd ht setup,

New for 2007, the HT series is designed specifically for race use. Featuring a remote reservoir for all four dampers, control is improved even under sustained, high-load use. Effectively doubling the volume of oil in each damper, the remote reservoir system also improves cooling and allows the HT dampers to have separate bump and rebound adjustment. There are four ‘coarse’ steps of bump adjustment, with 12 steps of finer adjustment effectively offering 48 steps of bump adjustment. Rebound adjustment also has 16 steps to choose from, with up to 5000N of damping force available.

To minimise unsprung weight, the HT series also offers a full aluminium damper casing and aluminium lower bracket. Naturally all HT models feature pillow-ball top mounts front and rear, with camber adjustment on strut suspension models. Coilovers offering this level of sophistication normally retail for more than double the recommended retail of our HT type.

i think dan has talked me into the new hsd ht setup,

New for 2007, the HT series is designed specifically for race use. Featuring a remote reservoir for all four dampers, control is improved even under sustained, high-load use. Effectively doubling the volume of oil in each damper, the remote reservoir system also improves cooling and allows the HT dampers to have separate bump and rebound adjustment. There are four ‘coarse’ steps of bump adjustment, with 12 steps of finer adjustment effectively offering 48 steps of bump adjustment. Rebound adjustment also has 16 steps to choose from, with up to 5000N of damping force available.

To minimise unsprung weight, the HT series also offers a full aluminium damper casing and aluminium lower bracket. Naturally all HT models feature pillow-ball top mounts front and rear, with camber adjustment on strut suspension models. Coilovers offering this level of sophistication normally retail for more than double the recommended retail of our HT type.

yeah i had a look at them but im a bit etchy on how good the valving is in them

i think dan has talked me into the new hsd ht setup,

New for 2007, the HT series is designed specifically for race use. Featuring a remote reservoir for all four dampers, control is improved even under sustained, high-load use. Effectively doubling the volume of oil in each damper, the remote reservoir system also improves cooling and allows the HT dampers to have separate bump and rebound adjustment. There are four 'coarse' steps of bump adjustment, with 12 steps of finer adjustment effectively offering 48 steps of bump adjustment. Rebound adjustment also has 16 steps to choose from, with up to 5000N of damping force available.

To minimise unsprung weight, the HT series also offers a full aluminium damper casing and aluminium lower bracket. Naturally all HT models feature pillow-ball top mounts front and rear, with camber adjustment on strut suspension models. Coilovers offering this level of sophistication normally retail for more than double the recommended retail of our HT type.

post-23079-1174349505.gif :huh:

:P wait its whore town :dry:

:D:wub:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...