Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you run a greddy plenum it will open up the top end and it shouldnt nose over...probably need a good exhaust manifold too (6boost). Our gt30 .82 rear went to 320rwkws without water injection and it pulled all the way to 8k redline. Remove all possible restrictions in the bolt ons and you can run the smaller puffers further to the edge without losing power.

Im up to 332rwkw now on 21psi and still have stock cams...

So a goal of 350rwkw (which to be honest is too much for a daily driven car) is easily achieved from the Garrett GT30R also know as the GT30/40...

Im at 21psi by 4000rpm btw, so its quite streetable, just farking stupid round town when it comes onto boost and jumps sideways... :unsure:

So i turn the boost controler down to 16psi where it makes just on 280rwkw and thats far easier to handle round town... :O

Im up to 332rwkw now on 21psi and still have stock cams...

So a goal of 350rwkw (which to be honest is too much for a daily driven car) is easily achieved from the Garrett GT30R also know as the GT30/40...

Im at 21psi by 4000rpm btw, so its quite streetable, just farking stupid round town when it comes onto boost and jumps sideways... :O

So i turn the boost controler down to 16psi where it makes just on 280rwkw and thats far easier to handle round town... :P

thats promising. i said noel's car will break the 400rwkw mark, and if ur results are anything to go by, he should do it fairly comfortably :unsure:

all noel's has to do, is pick up 69kw from 4psi more boost, cams & massive headwork, piece of piss i reckon

thats promising. i said noel's car will break the 400rwkw mark, and if ur results are anything to go by, he should do it fairly comfortably :unsure:

all noel's has to do, is pick up 69kw from 4psi more boost, cams & massive headwork, piece of piss i reckon

Easy.

if my bitsa can can 490rwhp/365rwkw on a td06-25g with t78 wheels on 1.5bar (3800rpm) Noel will piss it in

all noel's has to do, is pick up 69kw from 4psi more boost, cams & massive headwork, piece of piss i reckon

Fkn A doggie, shouldn't be a problem. Andy got 306rwkw on 18psi i'd like to see them bump it up to 22 or so and see what he can get. He doesn't think it'll be much of a difference but with the new fuel pump and shiz he shouldn't be running out of fuel like last time. I'm trying to convince him to go back to chiptorque, best tune we ever had was from them.

theres heaps of stuff on youtube, theres a clib with arabs drifting a Carrera GT and a McLaren Mercedes SLR....

I too am watching youtube clips...

cept i'm reminiscing so mine are in the form of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wor-Z4SyWCg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qmve365Ti1k

I too am watching youtube clips...

cept i'm reminiscing so mine are in the form of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wor-Z4SyWCg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qmve365Ti1k

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

haha and I wasn't a fan of human nature

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

except for one track which was very BSB/nsync

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qmve365Ti1k

Josh says:

some one will think im queer when they see this history

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

bahahah it will just confirm rumours

Josh says:

they're only true when im drunk

Josh says:

lol

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

z so i'd find you at the beat then?

かわいらしい さくら - MISS KITTEH! says:

hehe

Josh says:

they sell cheap drinks

Josh says:

quiet u

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...