Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For what reason do they wish they hadnt?

They werent as good as the tales made them out to be, and as such the fuel guzzling the excessive insurence and the frequent breaking didnt make it worth while

They werent as good as the tales made them out to be, and as such the fuel guzzling the excessive insurence and the frequent breaking didnt make it worth while

Are they that bad on fuel? not that it matters when you have a fuel car you are allowed to use on your own car!!!

hey hey bishes...

hey there isaac!!!

Are they that bad on fuel? not that it matters when you have a fuel car you are allowed to use on your own car!!!

off boost i got 620k's from 65ltrs, no idea what its like on boost...but my old gts-t was 380k's driving mainly off boost

It isnt the road going version of the LM car. The homogolation version was the ugly silver RWD thing you win in GT4 that looked alot like this

Frankys car was built to celebrate the sucess of that other car, and in my opinion it is much nicer :)

Why the plenum? The stock is good for around 300rwkw. The short runners will make you loose bottom end and in many cases power all over the range. Not the thing you want with a highflow (The bottom end losing that is) Because that is where its strengths lie.

The info I got (and subsequently offered as an explanation) appeared in Japanese Performamce mag issue 47 (Dec 2004). Here's a snippet of the article --->> CLICKY

If you want, you can also still buy the magazine here --->> CLICKY

so basically its a single turbo 2.7 gtr?

im just reading of that link karen supplied

The article relates to a specific vehicle (ie the 2.7, single turbo) but makes references to the standard LM models which were released. Tjose were the sections I was referring to. :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...