Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah i think this was annouced a few months ago for memory

Good news for the rich

Bad news for me

Just can't wait to see one on the road

i think its still good news for us cause its bound to push R34 GTR prices down further when a car is the last model of that series it hold a better price

no not concept and there is a article here i couldnt be bothered posting about it b4 in light of the weekends events

http://carsguide.news.com.au/story/0,20384...6-21822,00.html

early 2008, only 1.5 years, not that long to save!! my R34 is not going to be worth much by then... hopefully whatever job i have can pick up the slack :P

$150K i think would be the cheap side, i think more $170,000 - it's going to be too much car to go for $150K - i guess they'll try and stick to $150 as much as they can, get's a little "pyschological factor" above that amount.

997 Turbo is $330K+, if this car comes in anywhere under say $175k and can compete with the 997... it will be THE bargain performance car... but i guess they're going to run into the same problem of people justifying $150K+ for a Nissan. $150K would be nice i reckon and would be probably snagg the BFYB title if they could keep it there.

can't wait! I know someone down at the golf club will get one! There's one of eveything else down there :mad:

hmm....if its in the same price range as those ones - i say GIDDY UP!!!!

but i doubt it, its a car in with the likes of porsche and ferrari now.....150,000 is a realistic figure...though im not sure what to think of the 7spd sequential :ermm:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...