Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am also looking at using either a SAFC or PFC. Is there really much benefit in going for the PFC for a mildly modified car? My mods will be exhaust, FMIC, 10psi, filter, thats pretty much it. Is it worth going for PFC, or would SAFC be ok.

Sorry to hijack the thread, but it is kind of on the same topic.

i have a 33 gtst with 3" catback and pod filter thats about it.

now im looking to add more mods, wat would you suggest?

im thinking an SAFC will i get much gain with these minimal mods?

Here is a dyno comparison from my R33 GTS25t with exhaust and intake. Only modifications between the two runs is getting rid of the factory dual stage boost control and putting in an R32 wastegate actuator, and tuning the car using an S-AFC2.

Hope this helps :O

TuneComp.jpg

Get a boost controller before SAFC2.

SAFC2 won't help on a car running stock boost.

Quinny a safc will help by triming the factory standard rich settings if you still wish to run standard boost. But it will make a bigger difference when you up the boost. Check out the site in my sig mate it should answer most of your questions and the tuning guides are written in the order id suggest to do your mods. Also do a search heaps of info on here too.

cheers

Thanks Munna1, I have had a look at your tuning guides, and my mods are pretty much in line with the Stage 1 guide. I already have exhaust and pod, I will be getting a FMIC and boost controller soon. I will change boost to 10psi, other than that, I don't think I will be doing much more with the car because it starts to get into expensive mods after that. Around 180-200rwkw would be nice. I am just not sure whether it will be worth the extra $500 to get the PFC if the SAFC will do pretty much the same job.

power gain would be dependant on how well the stock ecu is running. if it is running poorly then the power gain would be bigger, but if the stock computer is atually pulling its weight then power gain would be less. i got 204rkw with stock computer and turbo and my afr's were above average for a stock ecu, according to the dyno operator, so my power gain would be less than someone who's afr's were up the creek.

as far as afr's go, performance gains between pfc and safc would be very little, it is just the fact that the pfc can control timing and other things that makes it a better unit.

also if you have an auto then forget a pfc and just get a safc.

id recommend the SAFC II if you dont have enough cash to get a standalone ecu..

here is my last dyno printout when i had my SAFC2 tuned..

rb25det R33

HKS 2530kai turbo

3" Exhaust turbo back (custom twin pipe dump)

Custom exhaust manifold

Electronic boost controller

FMIC

SAFC II

Blitz pod

BOV

post-29255-1148697092.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...