Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am also looking at using either a SAFC or PFC. Is there really much benefit in going for the PFC for a mildly modified car? My mods will be exhaust, FMIC, 10psi, filter, thats pretty much it. Is it worth going for PFC, or would SAFC be ok.

Sorry to hijack the thread, but it is kind of on the same topic.

i have a 33 gtst with 3" catback and pod filter thats about it.

now im looking to add more mods, wat would you suggest?

im thinking an SAFC will i get much gain with these minimal mods?

Here is a dyno comparison from my R33 GTS25t with exhaust and intake. Only modifications between the two runs is getting rid of the factory dual stage boost control and putting in an R32 wastegate actuator, and tuning the car using an S-AFC2.

Hope this helps :O

TuneComp.jpg

Get a boost controller before SAFC2.

SAFC2 won't help on a car running stock boost.

Quinny a safc will help by triming the factory standard rich settings if you still wish to run standard boost. But it will make a bigger difference when you up the boost. Check out the site in my sig mate it should answer most of your questions and the tuning guides are written in the order id suggest to do your mods. Also do a search heaps of info on here too.

cheers

Thanks Munna1, I have had a look at your tuning guides, and my mods are pretty much in line with the Stage 1 guide. I already have exhaust and pod, I will be getting a FMIC and boost controller soon. I will change boost to 10psi, other than that, I don't think I will be doing much more with the car because it starts to get into expensive mods after that. Around 180-200rwkw would be nice. I am just not sure whether it will be worth the extra $500 to get the PFC if the SAFC will do pretty much the same job.

power gain would be dependant on how well the stock ecu is running. if it is running poorly then the power gain would be bigger, but if the stock computer is atually pulling its weight then power gain would be less. i got 204rkw with stock computer and turbo and my afr's were above average for a stock ecu, according to the dyno operator, so my power gain would be less than someone who's afr's were up the creek.

as far as afr's go, performance gains between pfc and safc would be very little, it is just the fact that the pfc can control timing and other things that makes it a better unit.

also if you have an auto then forget a pfc and just get a safc.

id recommend the SAFC II if you dont have enough cash to get a standalone ecu..

here is my last dyno printout when i had my SAFC2 tuned..

rb25det R33

HKS 2530kai turbo

3" Exhaust turbo back (custom twin pipe dump)

Custom exhaust manifold

Electronic boost controller

FMIC

SAFC II

Blitz pod

BOV

post-29255-1148697092.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • me too wasnt real happy and cost me a penny or 2 to replace
    • But there's the archetype for the name plate! Here's my view on that stupid TÜV ruleset. Buy a brand name aftermarket piece of equipment. In this case, the Mines front pipe we're talking about. Get it TÜV certified on the car. Damage the underside of it, say on a speed bump. Cut out the damaged section, replace with fresh metal. (For the sake of the argument only), continue doing that to the whole pipe until it is all gone, replaced with new metal. Is this grandfather's axe still the same front pipe? The design hasn't changed (much). The pipe walls are in the same places. The flanges are in the same places. It is functionally identical. How does this differ from a pipe that is ever so slightly different in fabrication (ie the number of welds in it, a few mm here and there in terms of where the pipes run, are joined, etc)? Anyone with 0.5% of a brain can see that there is absolutely no way that the performance (power, environmental aspects, noise, etc etc) of it can be any different than the genuine Mines pipe. Maybe even Mines made 2 versions of this design, with the same differences. How would anyone (say a TÜV inspector) ever be able to differentiate between them? And yet, they are so bloody anally retentive about this stuff. Mad. How upset would they be if you had the wrong spring washers on the flanges?
    • Sakura (cherry blossom) tree at the end of a path going through Kabutoyama Park in Nishinomiya, Japan. Taken with Sharp Aquos R8
    • After a fairly extensive search using Japanese terms and checking Minkara etc, I couldn't find anything even close to your front pipe in the photos. I'm no expert but the two pipes merge really close to the flange connected to the catalytic converter which is rather unique from what I've seen, which makes me think it's more than likely a custom front pipe. The welds and 'more pipe sections than usual for a brand name pipe' makes it seem like a custom one.  Here's some photos of an old Mine's front pipe. You can see that it's just 4 pipe sections as opposed to 6, and arguably looks more like a 'production' front pipe:
    • Wtb r33 low side s2 ac line 
×
×
  • Create New...