The Alchemist Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Hi, just my 2c worth. I have a R32 GTR and, believe it or not, a FWD mazda 626 with quad throttle body injection on it. Both have aftermarket fuel injection on them. Both have known/measured CC/Min injectors in them. Both have a known fuel pressure at peak power. Both have a known AFR at peak power off the dyno. Both have known duty cycle/ms delivery time at their peak KW/HP off the laptop which allows me to calculate actual fuel consumption for each engine. This fuel consumption directly relates to kw/hp produced by the engine. The formula that defines this relationship does not change after a good arguement ( thank god for that ) Rather than bore you with the calculations here are the results instead. R32 GTR in 2WD mode on a dyno dymanics dyno 260rwkw/348hp> Calculated HP at the engine 530hp or a 35% transmission loss/tire frictional losses etc etc Mazda 626 quad T/B injection 91 FWKW/ 121 hp at the wheels > calculated HP at engine 168hp or a 27% loss for the front wheel drive. These are typical figures on our dyno for most rwd or fwd vehicles > ie: repeatable results hope this helps, Mike Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2239828 Share on other sites More sharing options...
allblitz Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 R32 GTR in 2WD mode on a dyno dymanics dyno 260rwkw/348hp Question is, what would that be on an awkw Dyno Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2239882 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denver Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 R32 GTR in 2WD mode on a dyno dymanics dyno 260rwkw/348hp> Calculated HP at the engine 530hpor a 35% transmission loss/tire frictional losses etc etc just shy of 200hp loss, in RWD mode? righhhhtttttt your maths is incredibly wrong somewhere, or your dyno reads incredibly low, 200hp of loss is a MONSTEROUS amount.. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2241024 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mazgtr Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 (edited) As it was stated before, a % power loss is not accurate. A 700BHP GTR isnt going to lose any more power through its drivetrain than a 400BHP GTR, providing they have the same transmission/gearbox/clutch/flywheel/fluid. Its much more logical that its a fixed amount. Someone suggested about 50-60KW of power loss from engine to rear wheel figure. And about 3-4% difference from this to an AWKW figure... Edited June 9, 2006 by mazgtr Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2242294 Share on other sites More sharing options...
allblitz Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Unfortunately in the business of dyno's - every dyno seems to have different readings, hence causing all these confusions. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2242331 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mazgtr Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 True, ive seen a car with "420RWKW" only clock 119MPH. And another GTR with 390RWKW clock 136MPH. Both on stock transmission. Clearly one car is makeing a lot more power than the other... Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2244898 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbz_13 Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 with my gtr there was i think 27kw(just under 30kw's) different from awkw's to rwkw's. and somewhat the same kinda power loss with a friend of mines gtr as well. (dyno'd at the same place) i have heard that through the attessa there is a power loss of 35% from the engine to all four wheels(the total figure put out). Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2246213 Share on other sites More sharing options...
T04GTR Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 True, ive seen a car with "420RWKW" only clock 119MPH. And another GTR with 390RWKW clock 136MPH. Both on stock transmission.Clearly one car is makeing a lot more power than the other... yes tru tru my old dr30 did 11.8 @128 mph with 329rwkw my gtr does 11.7@116mph with 315.9 rwkw. im sure the wieght diferance will contribute but 12mph is a pretty big diff Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2246306 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denver Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 yes tru tru my old dr30 did 11.8 @128 mph with 329rwkw my gtr does 11.7@116mph with 315.9 rwkw. im sure the wieght diferance will contribute but 12mph is a pretty big diff probably all in the launch, gt-r im guessing gets out of the hole better than the DR did, meaning it gets a good first 1/4 of the track but looses out on the top end mph, where as the dr might be boggy/wheel spinning out of the hole, but has the bigger mph to get to an almost identical time.. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2248260 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVS JEZ Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 my 32 GTR is going in for tune on 25psi this wednesday. we are going to do a final run in awd and a final run in rwd. will post the results as soon as i know. at the moment its got 403awkw on 19psi Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2248946 Share on other sites More sharing options...
allblitz Posted June 12, 2006 Share Posted June 12, 2006 That is INSANE power Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119673-rwkw-vs-4wkw/page/2/#findComment-2249487 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now