Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got unichip installed my car ( Gtst R33) and the dyno shows 155rwkw @ 13.5psi. I am running on an standard intercooler. Although I got a proper cold air partition and an water spray for the intercooler, I still think I am running too much boost. But the guy who tuned my car says theres no problem at all. Should I trust him?

I only drive the car hard at night or cooler days. will I have the problem of overboost and break my pistons? or the guy who tuned my car has tuned the car to suit that boost? and pro can give some suggestions?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12039-unichip-and-boosts/
Share on other sites

Is it a mechanical bleed valve or electronic boost controller? If it is a bleed valve then definately be bloody careful. Nissan turbo seals are only rated with a maximum pressure of 14psi before they do the turbo exhaust seal. Not to mention they have a plastic impeller fan :S Problem with boostin gon a stock cooler is the pressure loss in the stock cooler on skylines is not that good so if you are running 13.5psi at the manifold then more than likely your turbo is pushing about 16psi or even more depending on amospheric pressure and ambient temperature outside to actually make that kinda boost at the manifold. I suggest ya get a new cooler before ya go passed 10psi. If ya not gunna run a cooler then turn it down a tad. Also depends on how heavy ya foot is as to how long it will last.

BTW what mod's u got? cos with that kinda boost and a UniChip ya should be pushing more than that with light mod's dude... my mate on his is running same as me, exhaust filter bit a boost and fuel pressure reg and is pushing 187 at the wheels untuned? (i havn't dynoed mine yet).

YBSLO4, I only got pod filter and 3.5inch cat back exhaust. I think the dump pipe is standard. nothing else apart from that. Maybe I should reduce the boost.

but do you think that the guy who tune the car would map the engin so it would suit that kinda boost? or it wouldnt make any difference.

cos a intercooler would cost me another 1000 bux. and there would be more things I should worry about if I go over 170rwkw. like clutch, breaks, etc..

i dont plan to drive the car for long.

  • 4 weeks later...

Yea I agree YBSLO4, if i was you i wouldn't be turning the boost past 10 psi otherwise your engine will start detinating, which could put holes in your pistons.

You should finish off your exhaust first, as in get a high flow cat and a dump pipe. Then go the cooler. That way you get your car breathing properly. Your stock breaks are fine unless your doing 200 plus or your on your breaks all the time.

Hi Jet, there are two problems with the standard turbo, both centred around the ceramic exhaust turbine.

Firstly, being ceramic the turbine is sweated/bonded onto the common shaft and therefore it does not like too much resistance ie; the exhaust is pushing the turbine while the compressor is trying to move air into the engine. Too much resistance (boost) and the turbine and the shaft part company.

The second problem is one of heat, the ceramic turbine will only handle a certain amount of heat coupled with this resistance. The heat builds up over several minutes of very hard driving (say on a circuit) and the turbine shatters or parts company with the shaft. Leaning out the engine to achieve more horsepower also increases the temperature of the exhaust.

So to answer your question, our experience has been that 0.8 bar (12 lbs) is OK for a road car as long as it is only in short bursts so that the heat does not build up. If you do any circuit work or long distance high speed stuff, then 0.7 bar (10 lbs) may well be the safe max.

With a really good intercooler and pipes we have achieved 0.8 bar (12 lbs) on a 200 RWKW road car reliably. But 5 hard laps on the circuit and the smoke escaped.

If the tuner did a proper job there should be no risk of detonation regardless of the amount of boost. I have tuned internally standard RB25DET's for 2 bar, without any detonation. It is simply a matter of balancing the airflow air fuel ratios and ignition timing.

Dyno's all read differently, so I wouldn't worry too much about the absolute max horsepower. If we assume that the 155 rwkw is reasonably accurate, I would say that he has tuned it fairly conservatively. Rich A/F ratios and a bit of ignition retard.

Bottom line, I don't believe that detonation is going to be a problem, but turbo life certainly is.

Hope that helps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...