Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was going to make the same topic about a racing chip 4 my r33

my mates have been telling me to install a chip

but i have no idea who does it wat brand i should use and how much it would cost so if anyone could help in this thread it would be great

you are better off getting a chip burnt or safc tuned for your specific car than installing a one size fits all chip. alot of the chips out of japan are not good for australian fuels because they are tuned for 101 octane fuel. the jap ones run too much ignition timing and are often dangerous.

Given that its NA and you're probably not running a stripped down engine, I'd look at a piggyback. At a bolt-on level of tune the gains from going to a standalone ECU aren't worth the cost.

A'PEXi SAFC, Unichip (if they make one for your RB25DE), or the GReddy eManage / HKS F-Con etc would be fine. You'd then need to get it tuned.

But, as everyone else has said, don't get a "one size fits all" ECU. Its not tuned for your mods, so you'll either not get all the gains you could (which makes it a waste of time and money) or at worst it'll damage something.

If your car doesn't have any other mods, you'd be better off getting a catback exhaust before touching the ECU.

itll do bugger all. if you could magically reprogram the ecu and suddenly your car noticably better for racing then that would be so lovely, but if you could make the car that much better with the ecu alone, nissan would have made it like that. itll hardly make your car faster, it probably wont change you laptimes around a track etc. if you don't know that much about cars you probably wouldnt even notice a difference. to get more power out of an na 33 takes money, and you WONT get easy gains like a turbo car. you could put a full exhaust system on and make less power. you might make more. it might stay the same. Turbo it or spend $$$$$ making the RB25DE go harder (still not as hard as a turbo) OR....spend your money on things that will noticably make your car better for "racing", depending on your idea of the term..... (not the red light variety). My meaning would involve actually driving round corners.

For an NA 33, in order of how much it will improve your speed.

1. Driver training - skidpans/trackdays/motorkhanas/anything that involvers performance driving with tuition/supervision. That, and developing your understanding of the mechanics/dynamics of a car.

2. Suspension

3. Brakes

Helpful note: People that say "you should put a racing chip in it" have no idea, or are making fun of you. And if you are talking to someone who knows cars and you say that your 33 GTS has a racing chip you're going to look like an idiot.

on my NA 300zx i gained 22rwkw just from SAFC tune. no ignition timing increase. the reason nissan could not make their cars with the "ideal tuning" is because they have to run everything very safely because alot of people don't look after their cars. look at how rich factory ECU's run. NA 300zx's ideal A/F ratio is around 12.8:1, i imagine this would be not too dissimilar to NA skylines. my car before tuning was running at 10.5:1. it will make your car go faster, it will change your lap times, you will notice the difference, and you will save noticeably on fuel. it will make the car nicer to drive daily with more low-mid range torque. yes brakes and suspension are important, but i doubt that he is talking about racing his car on the track, more likely he is just using the term "racing chip" as a descriptor for modifying the ECU settings.

itll do bugger all. if you could magically reprogram the ecu and suddenly your car noticably better for racing then that would be so lovely, but if you could make the car that much better with the ecu alone, nissan would have made it like that. itll hardly make your car faster, it probably wont change you laptimes around a track etc. if you don't know that much about cars you probably wouldnt even notice a difference. to get more power out of an na 33 takes money, and you WONT get easy gains like a turbo car. you could put a full exhaust system on and make less power. you might make more. it might stay the same. Turbo it or spend $$$$$ making the RB25DE go harder (still not as hard as a turbo) OR....spend your money on things that will noticably make your car better for "racing", depending on your idea of the term..... (not the red light variety). My meaning would involve actually driving round corners.

For an NA 33, in order of how much it will improve your speed.

1. Driver training - skidpans/trackdays/motorkhanas/anything that involvers performance driving with tuition/supervision. That, and developing your understanding of the mechanics/dynamics of a car.

2. Suspension

3. Brakes

Helpful note: People that say "you should put a racing chip in it" have no idea, or are making fun of you. And if you are talking to someone who knows cars and you say that your 33 GTS has a racing chip you're going to look like an idiot.

Yes you right cookie300zx, im not gonna race on the track against other Skylines because i will probably have my arse handed to me, but hey gotta start somewhere right. I was meaning having the ECU modified. What is with the different geear ratios eg 12.8:1 & 10.5:1, what does that mean in plain english?

on my NA 300zx i gained 22rwkw just from SAFC tune. no ignition timing increase. the reason nissan could not make their cars with the "ideal tuning" is because they have to run everything very safely because alot of people don't look after their cars. look at how rich factory ECU's run. NA 300zx's ideal A/F ratio is around 12.8:1, i imagine this would be not too dissimilar to NA skylines. my car before tuning was running at 10.5:1. it will make your car go faster, it will change your lap times, you will notice the difference, and you will save noticeably on fuel. it will make the car nicer to drive daily with more low-mid range torque. yes brakes and suspension are important, but i doubt that he is talking about racing his car on the track, more likely he is just using the term "racing chip" as a descriptor for modifying the ECU settings.

if u take a closer look how SAFC works, u are advancing the ignition timing when u lean it down

if u take a closer look how SAFC works, u are advancing the ignition timing when u lean it down

cuold you explain that in more detail please. my base timing is set at 15 degrees (stock for 300zx NA) so could you explain how the ignition timing is being advanced by leaning out the AF ratio?

I saw a "LAP" chip for an rb25de on just jap's used electronics section

maybe this is the kind of thing you're after?

http://www.justjap.com/parts_uelectronics.htm

those are the things i was saying you should not be buying. would be tuned for JAP fuel, and you have no idea what the AF ratios and ignition timing would be set at! could be rather dangerous, and you won't get the same gains as a chip/piggy back that has been tuned for your car

Edited by cookie300zx

Personally i think if your going to keep your NA for a while and you love your car it can be a good idea to go for an ecu tune.

If your just going to do simple mods like exhaust&intake mods I would expect that you could certainly expect more power from getting your ecu modded.Put it this way, on my rb20de with 2 1/4 inch exhaust and k&n pod i made 85kw@wheels. Then the timing was advanced just a few degrees and it consistantly jumped up to 89rwkw's. When they mod your ecu they will generally change both your fuel and ignition maps together. If your going to run 98ron fuel all of the time then they would likely advance your timing right throughout the rev range as well as lean out your afr's a bit depending what they look like. I would say you could get maybe 6 or 7rwkw's out of it if it was done well.But thats just a rough estimate. wouldnt expect to much more than that.

The place im getting my rb20 ecu tuned for my turbo setup doesn't do rb25 ecu's yet.

Ohh and my old u12 pinny ka24e made 3.8fwkw's more after just timing advance so it gives you an idea of the extent of which tuning will effect the power of your NA.

  • 4 weeks later...

I have a rb30... Im yet to work out what it has done except add about 5rwkw. Tested it on a dyno but i just cant work out what it changed! Fuel consumption has stayed roughly the same and as far as i can tell the timing hasnt changed... The car runs a little smoother and i was told it would help elliminate any dark smoke but I didnt have much in the first place. Picked it up for $40 so i thought id give it a go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...