Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any definitve results regarding fuel economy being increased by replacing an atmo bov with a plumb back bov?

I've heard all sorts of things, like atmo bovs cause the engine to run richer coz the air measured isnt all there once blown off, but fuel is still pumped in according to air intake, blah blah blah.

I dunno, it's all a big grey area to me. :ermm:

I've got a GFB Hybrid BOV. Currently hooked up 50/50 atmo. So it is plumbed back, but also blows atmo 50%. I can just plug the trumpet and make it full plumbed.

By the way, if anyone has the screw in plug for my bov, let me know. I havent got one. Emailed GFB, not sure if they're available separately.

Ive only had my R33 for less than 2 weeks.

Should i reset my ecu? Would this perhaps remove the previous owner's driving style, and maybe give me better fuel economy?

As i understand it, reset ecu by disconnecting battery (positive) and hit the brakes or lights a few times to drain any remaining power.

Ive only had my R33 for less than 2 weeks.

Should i reset my ecu? Would this perhaps remove the previous owner's driving style, and maybe give me better fuel economy?

As i understand it, reset ecu by disconnecting battery (positive) and hit the brakes or lights a few times to drain any remaining power.

it was my understanding that u left it disconnected for 12 odd hours maybee sum1 could clarify this

I just got this email from GFB:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for fuelling issues, whilst it is possible that atmosphere-venting blow-off valves can increase fuel consumption, it is important to note that they do NOT change the air fuel mixture when they are closed, which is any time you are driving and cannot hear it venting. When they vent, this is when it can cause a rich spike, but fortunately a well set-up valve will make no measurable change in economy. Since your valve is a Hybrid, 50% of the air is being recirculated, which in itself will cut any potential extra fuel use straight away. Second, if the spring pre-load is set correctly so that the valve only vents when lifting the throttle after boosting (instead of every time you lift the throttle regardless of boost), this will also ensure excess fuel is kept to a minimum. It is also important to note that most modern ECUs will cut the injectors on a trailing throttle to conserve fuel, which means about half a second after you lift off the throttle, the injectors will cut regardless of what the valve is doing.

So to summarise, yes, an atmo valve can cause an increase in fuel consumption, but with the size, spring adjustment range and configuration of the 50/50 venting of the Hybrid, it is unlikely. Either way, if you are plugging off the trumpet, you will eliminate the concern altogether.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

still doesnt awnser your question about resetting ECU

after reseting your ECU and your drive hard so the ECU learns a hard drving style is it allways going to give you more spray in the injectors cuase the car thinks you allways want to drive hard ?

i get dredfull fuel econo but im 88% of the time on the boost

and by dredful i mean this week i got a little under 300km for the tank but could of squeezed 25-35 maybee more out of it dont want to run it dry

still doesnt awnser your question about resetting ECU

after reseting your ECU and your drive hard so the ECU learns a hard drving style is it allways going to give you more spray in the injectors cuase the car thinks you allways want to drive hard ?

That's what i want to know.

Also, how do you reset ecu ?

Is it even advisable to do so ?

can anyone recommend a cheap plum back bov? i got this loud ass one on my new r33 and its amazing i havent been pulled over yet... even somewhere i could buy a standard one...

Edited by Freddy Kruger
Yeah just buy a stock one, they do the job quite nicely. what sort of BOV do you have atm? You should be able to make it plumb back by piping it back into the standard hose.

That's right. I just converted my HKS SSQV from atmo to pulmb back. Too early to tell if it improves fuel efficiency, but early indication is pretty good though. The car is not running as rich as before.

Got the kit from BD4 for $35... money well spent...

Well just ran a week with my BOV closed and got about 460k from 51L, when Bov was open and same driving patterns (shifting before 3k) got about 420k's from 53L.

thats awsome economy i think mine is going down hill rapidly so hard to drive under 3k when it sounds soo good above that :D

but even when i do pussy foot it i dont get much over 300 from a tank ... but that isnt my full tank over until warning light comes on i dont drive it till fuel light goes on i normally drive till the 1/4 of a tank mark

on a side note how many ppls got funny fuel guages where u mioght say get 200km's b4 the guage moves then it drops quickly the next 100km

Heh awesome fuel economy will be past 500k's to 50L. Should make it happen when i get my Apexi FC. Will keep ya posted. But if your jsut driving to work or whatever, keep your BOV closed and when your having fun open it. Love this deceptor, well worth it in the end.

Yeah I think the fuel gauges on all Nissans are warped. My old Exa did that, my mates silvia does it and so does my mum's blurbird.

Yeah plumb back might be the way to go.

I've got a GFB Hybrid bov. U can plumb back full, half, or have full atmo.

It's just a matter of replacing the trumpet with the screw in plug.

I actually prefer the flutter sound it makes now rather than the loud pshhhhht blow off sound.

I think you only really get that if you are running a pod and maybe exhaust.

As for fuel economy, cant say yet, only plumbed back yesterday.

And yes, looks to me too like the nissan fuel gauge is not proportional.

On a crappier note, the f*cker that sold me my car claimed the timing belt and 100k service had been done.

After chasing him up for the receipt he promised he'd dig up, he finally spits out that it hadnt been done.

So i'm getting it looked at today, coz now I have now idea what it actually needs.

I've heard others say, when you get the car, change everything regardless. Sounds like good advice.

Hoping it's got old plugs. Coz if it does, that might explain fuel economy too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I might have to say it.
    • Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
    • I remembered wrong, but was close though 1Kz setting because those Jaycar SSRs don't go any faster, 1x pump per SSR with flyback diodes & heatsinks. In saying that, the heatsinks are overkill. Just on an alloy plate is more than sufficient. You'll find without a flyback diode, your SSRs will heat up big time and also die prematurely.  I've been running the two same SSRs since the last motor, no issues, car does 2 hour straight drives in summer once in a while and gets punished on the track. Nothing melts, no hot messes, etc.    
    • Hmm. You're probably best off working out what the lobe centreline or even the LSA is for the stock cams, with VCT OFF. That's bound to be out there somewhere. Then, work on the assumption that the Kelford centreline is probably the same, and wouldn't be more than a couple of degrees away, if it is different at all. I'm very surprised that you needed to adjust the exhaust cam by 5° to get it on spec. That screams there's another problem somewhere. Anything from the belt being 1 tooth off (how many degrees is one tooth worth?) to simple user/measurement error on the degree wheel. I say this because Kelford, like most quality cam manufacturers these days, does a pretty good job of actually making the cams to spec, not relying on patching it up afterwards like we had to do back in the 80s.
    • Besides packing it, you can also fill your pump through the oil filter inlet port. After cranking for what felt like an eternity without pressure, i fed a tube in through there and filled it with oil. Cranked for a few seconds after that and had pressure. 
×
×
  • Create New...