Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I hate the wheels, hate the painted dash and door bits, and hate the fiberglassing around the stereo. If it was all done in a more subtle shade or in a carbon-look, and had racing-style wheels, it would be a lot nicer IMO.

doesnt appeal to my taste exactly, im more function over form so the stereo is overkill to me, but i think its still a very nice example of a stag with minimal mods. looks very tidy, lot of time and effort in it.

would rather see the effort put into a c34 S2 260, though. same buy price, nearly. much better final product...

yeah that black is probably more for what id go for. just cos its black. and hot. yep.

i had a look at that white S2 on j-spec, thought it was nice. white wheels are a different touch. probably wouldnt buy it personally, but if someone else did, id happily take it out for skids.

off topic - fuzzy whats the go with your tail-lights man? im looking at getting a set of S2's, but the smoked ones on yours look pretty hot - whats the story? come with it? anyone else seen them?

they look at lot darker in photos.

IRL they are nice. Not too hard. They are not night shades either, they are sprayed.

sprayed? how do you spray them? just with a tinted clear coat or something, hope it dries really flat then just buff the sh*t out of it? might look into that even. Legal?

sprayed? how do you spray them? just with a tinted clear coat or something, hope it dries really flat then just buff the sh*t out of it? might look into that even. Legal?

yup ... with black paint, just light coats then cleared. As for being legal no, but how many cops know what a stagea is to even start with, let alone know what the tail lights are like!! :P

As alex says they look a lot better in real life ... not as dark as pic, but dark enough to offset nicely with white paint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd suggest the answer to the first question is at least a qualified "yes". I'll come back to that. Pineapples just don't do a lot to solidify the mounting of the subframe. They do a little bit, and that little bit was clearly helpful to me in the past, but the main thing they are intended to be used for is to tip the orientation of the subframe to try to either dial in more or less anti-squat. You can install them one way to try to increase launch traction, or the other way to try to increase lateral grip (at the notional expense of longitudinal traction). Or, as I did, you install them neutral, which only really offers a little bit of "snugging" up of the subframe. When I did pineapples, that was the only option. No-one had a machined alloy collar like the GKTech ones. There were some other options, but nothing like the slip in collars. And it is clear from looking at them that they occupy almost all the free space inside the rubber bush, so they will do a lot to stop them moving internally. So I thought, "that's the game for me!". Obviously the next/adjacent step is poly bushes, but what's the point in doing that with all the work and hassle required to change them over, when jamming (and I mean literally jamming) some alloy into the rubber bushes probably gives an equivalent, or possibly even superior result? So, to go back to your 1st question, I would suggest, for the investment of <<$100 and a morning spent lying under the car swearing and getting some sore fingers, it is certainly something you should try. Who knows? Maybe your situation is so severe that it doesn't solve it. But it might help a lot. If your problem is as severe as you say it is, the next thing to look at is what the rest of the bushes in the rear end a made from. Things like the Hardrace arms with hardened rubber bushes might be a good thing (for the purposes of having adjustability AND stiffer bushes). Otherwise, just poly bushes throughout could be a help. Or following in my fever dream footsteps and putting a lot of sphericals into the rear? Eliminate undersired movement to avoid the build up of resonances that cause the tramp. Also, if you have adjustable uppers in the rear, and you haven't put effort into adjusting the traction arms to minimise bump steer, there might be some advantage in that. If you don't want to go to the effort of doing it yourself (like I am pretty much forced to in Adelaide, owing to a lack of race alignment specialists) then surely there's a place in Melbs that is able to do it. It will cost $$, But that's life.
    • As someone who has pineapples, and horrible axle tramp... should I change these to collars? Is that what you're saying here? Why did you choose these instead of getting pineapples where you said you had good experiences of? I'd love to even attempt to get rid of axle tramp, I either get complete bogginess or absolute insane wheelspin, anything even remotely in between results in filling-removal axle tramp, to the point where launching the car is just not something I do.
    • Lucky for that, because putting ethanol in fuel only lowers the bulk cost of fuel if it's in 91 Add it to 98, 85% of it even and it quintuples in price. Strange physics. f**k you United, Gouging c***ts.
    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...