Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The 387 is the listed part for the RB20DET but you can use any of the fuel filter of the same diameter. The 33's do take a z200 but only in the GTST from memory. The GTR still retained the Z387.

Make sure you buy two meters of EFI fuel hose too. Usually they are perished anyway and for the extra $20 it makes it easier when you change it over. The hose takes 3 days to get off so it's easier if you undo the clamp, move the clamp away and use a stanley knife to cut the hose lengthways. This will make the hose literally fall off. Then you just cut same length pieces for the new filter and pre clamp them before installing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121691-fuel-filter/#findComment-2245920
Share on other sites

i didn't need to cut the hose or anything, my hoses were fine, so i didn't replace them

the one i got sold didn't have the 90deg bend, (same filter, but both lines were straight) so it didn't fit in the bracket properly. still does the job though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121691-fuel-filter/#findComment-2245937
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...