Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For Sale One set of HKS GT2540's Ball baring , oil cooled.

suit RB26.

Turbos are in excellent condition and with low klms still in the car at the moment

$3500

One set of HKS CAMS suit RB26

264 Degrees 10 ml lift

In excellent condition

$1000

$800 change over for standard Cams

Located in Melbourne

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12183-hks-gt2540s/
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I may be interested in the second turbo. How does $1500 sound. I live in Melbourne and can inspect, pick-up and pay cash.

Can you please supply all specs related to these turbos, via PM or e-mail: [email protected]

-Does it bolt straight on to a RB25DET ex. manifold and plumbing mods are required?

-How old is it (km and months)?

-why are you selling it?

-What are the specs?

-Is it high or low mounted?

Thanks for your time and help. Hope to hear from you soon.

ALAN C.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12183-hks-gt2540s/#findComment-274692
Share on other sites

PM'd you the info

Here are some specs for anyone else interested

HKS GT2540 - 350 PS Output

COMPRESSOR:

-Wheel- 46 Trim - 51.7 Inducer / 76.2 Major

-Housing- 60 Inlet / 50 Outlet - 0.60 A/R

TURBINE:

-Wheel- 76 Trim - 53.8 Major / 47.0 Exducer

-Housing- T3 inlet / Internal Skyline Type oulet - 0.64 A/R

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12183-hks-gt2540s/#findComment-275166
Share on other sites

Sir Bean, 250 rwkw is 375 bhp, so the 350 bhp rating looks about right. HKS freely admit that their turbo ratings are about 10% less than what the turbo can actually do in an ideal situation ie; 350 bhp + 10% = 385 bhp.

Plus some dynos read more than others.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12183-hks-gt2540s/#findComment-277387
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...