Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

omg. someone make nark prime minister.

as for the video of zambrotta's supposed handball....and it being deliberate...LOL

first off, it doesnt really look like it hit his arm. comes off his chest/stomach, and deflects forward.

secondly. did you not see the australian in front of him attempting the scissor? so when he missed, zambrotta has about .01 of a second to see the ball coming at him

third, he must have eyes in the back of his head as well to know that if he put his arm there, it would directly impede the path to viduka's foot. lets face it, if it did make it to vidukas foot he probably would have messed it up anyway :D

he looks to be VERY close to an offside position as well...i wont comment for sure because of the poor camera angle :laugh:

and implying that he deliberately handballed it to stop it getting to viduka....i wont even comment on that :D

Have a look at the video a few more times. My opinon

- It did hit his hand, if it didn't the ball would of deflected of the side of his thigh, and continued behind him.

- It hit his arm/hand after hitting his thigh, which caused the ball to drop to his feet...

- Why were his hands there in the first place? even tho the scissor was attempted in front of him, he still knew where the ball was coming from and where it was going, hence why he put himself correctly between viduka and the ball. He knew if no one interfeared with the ball it was coming exactly where it did, why? because he's a professional, thats his job to predect these things. Whenever i take a ball like that i never have my hands by my side like that, you don't do it for hte risk, unless you actually want them there for a reason (to give you more width).

regardless it wasn't as clear cut as i first thought, so i can forgive the ref not giving that one, why? because there was doubt.... just like the 'dive'... there must of been doubt there too, but he gave that.

I hope ukraine get a penalty tonight with 8 seconds to go for diving in the penalty box with the score 0-0.... I don't think Ukraine will have as many supporters in australia as they will tonight... and for good reason :P

Have a look at the video a few more times. My opinon

- It did hit his hand, if it didn't the ball would of deflected of the side of his thigh, and continued behind him.

- It hit his arm/hand after hitting his thigh, which caused the ball to drop to his feet...

- Why were his hands there in the first place? even tho the scissor was attempted in front of him, he still knew where the ball was coming from and where it was going, hence why he put himself correctly between viduka and the ball. He knew if no one interfeared with the ball it was coming exactly where it did, why? because he's a professional, thats his job to predect these things. Whenever i take a ball like that i never have my hands by my side like that, you don't do it for hte risk, unless you actually want them there for a reason (to give you more width).

regardless it wasn't as clear cut as i first thought, so i can forgive the ref not giving that one, why? because there was doubt.... just like the 'dive'... there must of been doubt there too, but he gave that.

I hope ukraine get a penalty tonight with 8 seconds to go for diving in the penalty box with the score 0-0.... I don't think Ukraine will have as many supporters in australia as they will tonight... and for good reason :D

maybe, to the ref, who makes the call, there wasn't any doubt. like i said, he sees it in real time, and doesn't have a .gif file replaying over and over.

FORZA AZZURI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

who watched the game?

if you told someone the score it wouldn't do the win any justice....90 seconds to go in the second half of extra time....pirlo with the through ball to grosso, who wraps it around the keeper perfectly!

a minute later italy break on the counter attack, and fantastic awareness by gillardino to tap it back for del piero, to stride in and finish it off beyond all doubt!

I almost went through the roof when Grosso scored....and I think my neighbours got an earlier wake up than they'd have liked.

del piero is god. that is all.

why didnt they put him on b4 iaquinta? totti shits me 2 and im italian lol

i watched the whole game except for 2nd half ET

i get in the car 2 goto work and i hear GGGOOOAALLL on the radio

that sux lol i just missed it

Grosso looks like a duck.

so? what a farking goal >_<

Iaquinta was fantastic. played EXTREMELY well. he's an attacker, but played some defense as well as thats what was neccessary...and he both attacked and defended fantasticly.

gillardino almost scored straight away, and zambrotta moments later....o much for italy playing defense...even after grosso scored, they didnt all run back and crowd the defense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...