Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how about this example...

a stock rb20 vs stock telstar tx5 turbo

I can tell you that in stock form the telstar, with its 2.2L engine makes the same amount of power

Fair enough, but i would have thought that the acceleration figures of a stock tx5 turbo would not be as quick as an r32 gts-t (i am assuming its an r32 based on the rb20). I dont know much about tx5's but im pretty sure they are 5 door car and stock i would have thought 0-100km around about 8secs :S

I only meant to use stock acceleration figures as a means for a base, the power output of a cars engine is of little use when viewed in isolation, because u have to consider how it puts it to the ground, how much it weighs, etc hence the 0-100km/h figure is most relevant.

But i still know where you are comming from, different engines will respond better or worse to mods regardless of factory figures because of different engines potential

Edited by r32line
so who won exactly? if it was your friend, his car would have to be heavily modified or the ford towing a caravan (as they do).

my thoughts are mid 6's. why? they feel very similar (maybe a little faster) than the 2 s15 200sx's i've been in and on average I think their times have been aroun the 6.5 to 7 sec mark. That said they have very different power deliveries so i may be off the mark.

I think it's one of those cars that feels very sluggish until you apply a fair bit of throttle. in addition they can sound like they are trying when they are not.

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

How can a car that does around 6.2 sec to 100 (in Japan with Japanese fuel which is 101 RON back in 94-97) beat a much NEWER car that does around 6.1 sec more so "leave for good?"

Nothing like beating a Commo or Falcon driver in your skyline :D your mate is runnin a shit load of boost on a stock R33 but yeh any way 14.4 is the average number they get cant have every car running it unless they narrow it down on smaller timing it depends on the driver also but doesn't change dramatically but a very stunning site i've seen was a Honda Civic Vtec with nos definitely not stock beat a XR8 got it on film XR8 driver didnt know what to think will try and post it up

where you hear a R32 is faster then a R33? GTR Versions yes but not GTS-T's!

Edited by _Victory_
How can a car that does around 6.2 sec to 100 (in Japan with Japanese fuel which is 101 RON back in 94-97) beat a much NEWER car that does around 6.1 sec more so "leave for good?"

i said my mate's R33 GTST left the XR6 Turbo for good when he put up the BOOST! 14PSI...maaate read properly before u post...

where you hear a R32 is faster then a R33? GTR Versions yes but not GTS-T's!

Stock the R33 is quicker than the 32.

Up the boost to the usual 11psi with an fmic on the r33 and up the boost to the usual 1bar on the r32 and the R32 is quicker than the r33. The downfall for the R33 once one starts to up the boost is the r33 ecu's really do suck.

Well mine was, also had ever so slightly more accleration (very very very slowly walking away) from a 100% stock R33 GTR.

0-100 in 5.2secs and 175km/h in high 13 seconds.

I have seen one freak R33 that with 11psi, exhaust and simply bolting on a fmic made ~200rwkw, it went on to run a low 13sec 1/4.

i said my mate's R33 GTST left the XR6 Turbo for good when he put up the BOOST! 14PSI...maaate read properly before u post...

ok then. just incase you dont know, if u put a blower onto a v8 or a v6 it would also leave a stock v6 or v8 for good.. its called, "mods." :glare:

  • 3 years later...
ok did a bit of research on the R33 GTS-T 0-100kph, 0-400m.

0-100kph in 6.2secs

0-400m in 14.4secs

for all you R33 GTS-T owners, what do u think? are those times true??

tell me what are your 0-100kph times.

cheers

brand new and stock yes but after 10-15years, unless modified, you can expect reduces times.

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

so just to confirm this guy is saying his stock r33 with 14psi beats a stock xr6turbo, that sounds right when stock an r33 has 5-6psi, my mate is running 15psi(xr6 turbo) so one above the r33 and is making 333rwkw a few minor mods lik twin 2.5inch exhuast, cam, pod filter and tiss be it, so hows that even comparing an apparent stock r33 to a real stock xr6turbo

  • 9 years later...

Sorry to revive an old thread. I've seen people post times of 13 to 14 second 1/4 mile times on GTST with just BPU bits added. 

My question is, was these on prepped tracks or not? 

I ran a 14.4 with my GTST on an unprepped track. with 18" Semi slicks it spins all the way through 1st, 2nd and most of 3rd. 

I'm sure that with proper traction I could do a low 14 to high 13 second pass. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...