Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how about this example...

a stock rb20 vs stock telstar tx5 turbo

I can tell you that in stock form the telstar, with its 2.2L engine makes the same amount of power

Fair enough, but i would have thought that the acceleration figures of a stock tx5 turbo would not be as quick as an r32 gts-t (i am assuming its an r32 based on the rb20). I dont know much about tx5's but im pretty sure they are 5 door car and stock i would have thought 0-100km around about 8secs :S

I only meant to use stock acceleration figures as a means for a base, the power output of a cars engine is of little use when viewed in isolation, because u have to consider how it puts it to the ground, how much it weighs, etc hence the 0-100km/h figure is most relevant.

But i still know where you are comming from, different engines will respond better or worse to mods regardless of factory figures because of different engines potential

Edited by r32line
so who won exactly? if it was your friend, his car would have to be heavily modified or the ford towing a caravan (as they do).

my thoughts are mid 6's. why? they feel very similar (maybe a little faster) than the 2 s15 200sx's i've been in and on average I think their times have been aroun the 6.5 to 7 sec mark. That said they have very different power deliveries so i may be off the mark.

I think it's one of those cars that feels very sluggish until you apply a fair bit of throttle. in addition they can sound like they are trying when they are not.

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

How can a car that does around 6.2 sec to 100 (in Japan with Japanese fuel which is 101 RON back in 94-97) beat a much NEWER car that does around 6.1 sec more so "leave for good?"

Nothing like beating a Commo or Falcon driver in your skyline :D your mate is runnin a shit load of boost on a stock R33 but yeh any way 14.4 is the average number they get cant have every car running it unless they narrow it down on smaller timing it depends on the driver also but doesn't change dramatically but a very stunning site i've seen was a Honda Civic Vtec with nos definitely not stock beat a XR8 got it on film XR8 driver didnt know what to think will try and post it up

where you hear a R32 is faster then a R33? GTR Versions yes but not GTS-T's!

Edited by _Victory_
How can a car that does around 6.2 sec to 100 (in Japan with Japanese fuel which is 101 RON back in 94-97) beat a much NEWER car that does around 6.1 sec more so "leave for good?"

i said my mate's R33 GTST left the XR6 Turbo for good when he put up the BOOST! 14PSI...maaate read properly before u post...

where you hear a R32 is faster then a R33? GTR Versions yes but not GTS-T's!

Stock the R33 is quicker than the 32.

Up the boost to the usual 11psi with an fmic on the r33 and up the boost to the usual 1bar on the r32 and the R32 is quicker than the r33. The downfall for the R33 once one starts to up the boost is the r33 ecu's really do suck.

Well mine was, also had ever so slightly more accleration (very very very slowly walking away) from a 100% stock R33 GTR.

0-100 in 5.2secs and 175km/h in high 13 seconds.

I have seen one freak R33 that with 11psi, exhaust and simply bolting on a fmic made ~200rwkw, it went on to run a low 13sec 1/4.

i said my mate's R33 GTST left the XR6 Turbo for good when he put up the BOOST! 14PSI...maaate read properly before u post...

ok then. just incase you dont know, if u put a blower onto a v8 or a v6 it would also leave a stock v6 or v8 for good.. its called, "mods." :glare:

  • 3 years later...
ok did a bit of research on the R33 GTS-T 0-100kph, 0-400m.

0-100kph in 6.2secs

0-400m in 14.4secs

for all you R33 GTS-T owners, what do u think? are those times true??

tell me what are your 0-100kph times.

cheers

brand new and stock yes but after 10-15years, unless modified, you can expect reduces times.

my friend's R33 GTST won the race mate. they drag race @ the lights.

the XR6 turbo ain't that quick buddy. 0-100 in 6.1secs for the XR6 turbo? skyline is around 6sec mark too right? it depends on the driver to u know because both cars (R33 GTST 96' and XR6 Turbo) are pretty even on the 0-100?

my mate said the XR6 turbo was fast, they were head-to-head but when me mate whack in boost 14psi+, left the XR6 turbo for good.

no doubt that the XR6t was quick... peace out

so just to confirm this guy is saying his stock r33 with 14psi beats a stock xr6turbo, that sounds right when stock an r33 has 5-6psi, my mate is running 15psi(xr6 turbo) so one above the r33 and is making 333rwkw a few minor mods lik twin 2.5inch exhuast, cam, pod filter and tiss be it, so hows that even comparing an apparent stock r33 to a real stock xr6turbo

  • 9 years later...

Sorry to revive an old thread. I've seen people post times of 13 to 14 second 1/4 mile times on GTST with just BPU bits added. 

My question is, was these on prepped tracks or not? 

I ran a 14.4 with my GTST on an unprepped track. with 18" Semi slicks it spins all the way through 1st, 2nd and most of 3rd. 

I'm sure that with proper traction I could do a low 14 to high 13 second pass. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...