Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Time for my baby to go, due to genuine reasons. I have owned her for just under a year, and have loved every second of it. Has been maticulously looked after.

1992 Nissan Skyline R32 GTS-t Type M

HCR32 Build Date: 12/1992 Australian Compliance Date: 01/2001

Morello (Maroon) In Colour

175,000 kms

RB20DET 6 Cylinder Turbo

5 Speed Manual Transmission

3" Full Mandrel-Bent Exhaust System With Hi-Flow Cat (3" Turbo/Dump pipe, 3" Piping All The Way)

Hybrid Intercooler Kit (600x300x76mm, Polished Piping)

K & N Pod Air Filter (Polished Top)

Standard RB20 BOV (Can Provide Aftermarket R32 BOV Adaptor)

Standard RB20 Turbo (Running 11psi)

Bosch 040 Fuel Pump

Bosch Ignition Coils On Custom Aluminium Coil Rail

New NGK Iridium Spark Plugs

Brand New Exedy Cushioned Button Clutch Kit

Brand New Master And Slave Clutch Cylinders

Century HP Battery

18" BSA & SSA Shadow Chrome Wheels With 225/40/18 Firenza Tyres

Tein Super Street Coilovers (Height And Damper Adjustable)

DBA Slotted Front Rotors, Bendix Heavy Duty Brake Pads On All Four Corners

Standard 4-Pot Calipers and 2-Pot Calipers, Front And Rear

Factory Type-M Bodykit (Front Bar Trimmed To Suit Intercooler)

Factory Type-M Velour Interior

GTR Front & Rear Seats

Black Front AXS Seat Covers

Razo Auto/Manual Turbo Timer

Momo Race Steering Wheel And Gear Knob

Factory Power Windows And Electric/Power Mirror Options

She has been maticulously looked after, serviced every 5,000kms using synthetic Penrite oil and Ryco oil filter. All work has been carried out by qualified mechanics. Only 98 Octane premium fuel has been used, as well as injector cleaner on every fill-up. All tests welcome.

It owes me over $22k, no expense has been spared.

I am looking for around the $11,000 mark as is. All offers are welcome.

For any interested parties, please either PM me or ring 0403803262.

Cheers,

Nath

100_0107800600.jpg

100_0047800600.jpg

100_0037800600.jpg

100_0149800600.jpg

Edited by NathR32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122973-1992-nissan-skyline-r32-gts-t/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...

My car is still for sale.

Looking for $13,500 now. Only selling due to a move to Sydney and wanting to buy a house etc.

Please PM or ring me if you are interested.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hey nath me neither man. Cant beleive. Maybe update your add. add some new pics in it etc. If i had the money i would buy it back off you. I loved this thing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...