Jump to content
SAU Community

Compression Test Results... Good Or Bad?


Beef
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey lads, i just have a question about cylinder compression,

depending on what power your making will the cylinder compression be different?

FOR EXAMPLE if a r33 skyline is making 400rwkw will the compression in each cylinder be higher than one making 200rwkw? or should it be the same...

i really dont know anything about this so its probably a stupid question and obvious answer....

I have a 1994 R33 GTS25T making 209.8kw atw @12psi:

the compression test was as follows:

-----Leak Down--------Compression

1.-----15%----------------125psi

2.-----15%----------------125psi

3.-----15%----------------125psi

4.-----15%----------------125psi

5.-----15%----------------125psi

6.-----15%----------------130psi

may car had travvelled 123,500kms when this test was done.... and now only has 126,200kms on it

is this a good result or not so good result, please.... any advice would be much appreciated.

Beef

Edited by Beef
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The compression ratio is a physical property of the engine. Broadly think of the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at bottom dead centre & compare that to the volume in the cylinder when the piston is at top dead centre. You (for an Rb) will get a number about 8.5 to 1 or slightly higher depending on which Rb variant you have.

excellent description of what "compression" actually is, but it fails to answer both my questions:

1. higher output engine = higher compression per cylinder?

2. are my results of my compression test good, average or bad?

Beef

Edited by Beef
Link to comment
Share on other sites

with compression tests there are a number of things to look for...one is the total variance between highest to lowest. Your results look good in that regard.

However the "stock compression" from memory is 175/180 in a R33GTST...when I had mine tested my results were in the 165 bracket and its done about 100k. I was very happy with that.

I would be suggesting your figures are low...however the total variance is well within range.

Not being an expert though. some1 else might have a better analysis

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, so what does it mean.... lower compression more worn engine?

Yes.

is there any way to make the compression higher if it gets a bit low.... for example, is there any way to get the compression back up to 170psi from 125psi like my engine currently is?

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

No. You basically have to rebuild the motor.

To answer the question implicit in your original post:

Testing a modded (Stock internal) motor for compression should give the same numbers as an unmodified motor.

BUT

When operating at full output the BMEP of the modded motor will obviously be higher.

cheers DJR.... makes sense now, but to thebest of my knowledge my engine was rebuilt in 2004 at about 80,000kms.... and im not sure if the compression test was done before or after... maybe i should get another one done, how much do they cahrge approx for it...

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15% leakage coupled with the low comp suggests it's just a reasonably tired motor. but nothing to worry about too much as they are all fairly even, albeit at the lower limit of acceptable compression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ahh, if the engine was rebuilt that changes things. does it have forged pistons?

how does it make any difference... i dont think it has forged pistons.... no..

so what does this mean now?

Edited by Beef
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes a difference on two counts:

1. If the pistons are not standard they may have a different compression ratio and also the new engine may have a thicker head gasket (to give but two examples) In short the number shown in the Nissan manual may no longer apply.

2. If it is only two years old it should still have good compression.

Your first post read like the test was done only recently on this motor.

But then you have said that you are not sure which motor it was done on?

If you are having problems with the motor (Are you?) then it sounds like you need another test done as the numbers are indicative of an old, tired motor. What I cannot explain is why the numbers are so close together. Usually the lower they are the further apart (cylinder to cylinder) they get....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry beef i asked for the reasons djr81 posted. also some engine builder may use a larger piston to bore clearance when cold which if the test was done on a cold motor (shouldn't have been) you would get a very low reading like you have there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah any1 who has done a compression test knows to warm the car...so i assume that was done properly...125 is very low IMO...and you are right it seems wierd cos usually one or two cyl. are llower than the rest...from my experience anyway

without factoring in the rebuild..mine is a 94, 101,000km and was in the 160s-165s as above...this is the origional engine...mainly stock. Just as a reference.

If one cyl. is a bit low this can be put down to carbon bulid up etc...but not that low...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

125psi is pretty low.

ive rebuilt my motor with standard internals and im getting 125psi BEFORE the run in.

go get another comp test done.

the figures seem TOO close together. if they were that low i would think there would be small variances of 3-5psi between them at least. thats my opinion rather than expert advice so just get another one done somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, well it looks like im gona need to get another one from a different person.....

what is the process of a compression test.... like how do they do it?

just by comptuer testing through the console or what....?

and also what does it roughly cost to get one done?

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no need to answer those questions:

1. how do they do it:

first they take off the coil packs and remove the spark plugs and test it that way.... that way i can get my coil packs and plugs looked at at the same time....

2. i can get one done by a genuine nissan dealer for $40

sound good?

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey all,

just another question, its booked in to have another compression test done this afternoon, but if it turns out the same results...

what does that mean?

is there any real worry.... if i drive it normally is there going to be any detrimental effects?

is it going to have any bad repocussions?

please advise...

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

ok well thats good to hear, so what your saying is that there is no huge risk and if i drive it nice and steady adn normal, there will be nothing to worry about?

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's no big worry mate. just keep an eye on the oil level to make sure it's not using oil too much (and if it is just keep topping it up). it wont cause you any major problems, it's just symptom of a tired engine with worn rings. it may cost you a little power but if you cant afford the rebuild now dont worry about it, just start saving for when you can rebuild it.

as for teh oil, it doesnt use any.....

its last service was on 123,500 and now its 126,700 and it hasnt used a drop.....

so there is nothing to worry about there, and it doesnt blow smoke or anythign.... it goes good.....

so yeah.... maybe its not as bad as i first thought..

Beef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Little more work!  Did some body work on the rear wheel arches and since the paint was a cheap spray job before figured I’d do something to tide me over until I wrap the car.    Colour might not be everyone’s choice but I like it and it’s only temporary, just hate having primer from the wheel arches standing out.    Keeping an eye out for a decent set of wheels to throw on now. Wheels and tires on the car are junk
    • Its likely to be 70% road 30% track usage, track usage will increase if anything. Decided not to fit it as I cant be arsed changing the bushes on my LCAs again 🤣 I did get the below back from GKTech though so they should work together     The anti-squat kit and roll center adjusters work independently since they change the rear lower control arm's angle in different ways. The anti-squat kit adjusts the angle from front to back, which impacts anti-squat values. Roll center adjusters change the angle side to side, mainly to correct geometry on cars that are significantly lowered. They might affect each other a tiny bit, but overall, you can think of them as separate.
    • What are you doing with the car? street car or race car? People get hung up on the squat of the s/r chassis rears. There is positives to the squat if a car is setup and driven correctly for it (correct ride height, spring rate, alignment, damper valving). Generally just lengthen the rear traction arm by 5-10mm and that will help the squat and bump steer too. You are also correct with the roll centre too. This too also needs to be adjustable if you start messing with suspension geometry.   Having done quiet a bit of testing on race cars this year in regards to rear squat, I've seen some big positives from it in regards to drive off corners and traction. 
    • I find I am using the MX5 for everything except long overnight cruises with Jackie, or, if picking up the kids to go somewhere, the SS has so much more room inside, and is much more comfortable if your going to be doing Hwy driving for 6-8 hours And the MX5 isn't bad in stop go traffic for a manual transmission car, whilst the clutch kit has been upgraded from stock, it is still light, and also not having a stupidly light flywheel in it helps as well, I've spent alot of time sitting on the M5, M4 and M7 stuck in traffic when plodding around the Greater Sydney Region in it Another benefit is MX5's are not really a car that gets stolen, you can pretty much park it anywhere, and it will still be there when you return
    • I can totally get why you like it for that sort of commute. I was thinking BoganDore because it's such a lazy drive, for things like stop start traffic.   I used to do over an hour in stop start shit from one side of Bris to the next, twice a day. My choice of car was larger displacement, with an auto. Basically for torque in low rpm/very low speed, and no clutch pedal. But loved a fun manual for the weekends, which the partner has (plus had the LandCruiser too for other fun drives). I now have an EV as a work car, and I tell ya what, ultimate daily driver, especially if youre out of energy, like I often am after work. I don't even need to touch the brake pedal   That said, I'm presently rebuilding the Liberty GTB to get it setup for weekend drives and track abuse! So small high revving turbo engine with 6 speed cog swapper!   But for your style of commute, I'd probably take the MX5 too!   For those choices, I'm ignoring fuel economy. Because I know how atrocious V8 daily life is for fuel from when I used to daily a manual SS, ha ha. Hence why I know I love the daily rumble of a V8
×
×
  • Create New...