Jump to content
SAU Community

Dyno An Gtr34 V-spec On Rwd Mode On A 4wd Dyno

HorseGTR
 Share

Recommended Posts

HorseGTR Apprentice

HorseGTR

Posted
Posted

Hi guys,

If we remove the 4wd fuse (gtr34 v-spec) to measure the rwkw on a 4wd dyno, what will affect or damage to the drive line??

In normall driving condition (without torque split), is it true that the gtrs are running permanant on 25% front and 75% rear power??

Any explains would be appriciated, CHEERS !!!

Count Grantleyish Grand Master

Count Grantleyish

Posted
Posted

On 34 gtr, remove 4wd fuse and front driveshaft and it'll run on RWD mode.

Do a search as this topic has been covered many times.

Why you want to run RWD on 4WD dyno?

Cheers

Grant

ebola Proficient

ebola

Posted
Posted (edited)

What the mechanic did is fine on an R32...

R33/34 - consider the equivalent of slipping the clutch for the entire dyno run.

take a poke through the forums, have a search and I am sure that there will be a technical thread about it . Understand WHY it is not a good idea (its not...).

but i would not put it on a 2wd dyno without removing the fuse like in the 32gtr. i am unsure about 34gtr but i beleive its similar.

Its not similar. You won't damage the R32 like that.

Edited by ebola
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
as I mentioned, we had to run it in rwd mode (on a 4wd dyno) because during the tuning the 4wd check light came on and the torque didn't split at all. So the mechanic took a risk !!!

mentioned where? call me blind but in this thread you havent said anything about that

Anyways...

Please search, common topic this is for GTR owners.

And if your mechanic doesnt know this... i wouldnt take the car back there as they have no idea (obviously)

To answer the question briefly, the shaft MUST be removed.

This is crucial. Just pulling the fuse will still cause wear to the clutch packs in the 4WD transfer case as its not in "true" RWD mode with the drive shaft still connected.

T04GTR Grand Master

T04GTR

Posted
Posted

yess. just incase. any awd post r32. you cant just pull the fuse as youl burn out the transfer case.

as its "preloaded"

as a general rule. if the cars got 2 drain plugs on the transfer case you can. if its only got 1 plug. you cant

HorseGTR Apprentice

HorseGTR

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I did search about this attesa controll topic, but I haven't satisfied because all GTRs can use after market torque split controlls (such as an HKS unit for example) to adjust the desire split levels. I've seen some footages about street drag in Japan, gtr33 and gtr34 did a massive burn out b4 they lined up. Hmm, how did they manage to do that without burning the clutch packs in the transfer case???

What I'm thinking is when we adjust the torque controll module at 0, means no torque transfer, isn't this equivalent to remove the fuse ( no torque transfer too) ??? can any one make this clear?? CHEERSS !!

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

why keep asking opinions if you are not going to beleive them?

the correct info is in this thread. 32 is fine to run in rwd mode indefinately due to different attesa pump preload on the plates in the transfer case. 33 and 34 all 4wd systems always have some front drive.

we make attesa controllers. They modify the signal to the computer to go rwd only, but that does *not* change the preload in later models so we recommend not using rwd mode in 33 and 34.

And a burnout is one thing (let the case slip for a while), and they may have line locker for the front brakes, but a dyno is totally different. What would happen if you have the rear on the rollers, start to spin the rollers, wheel speed sensors show rears are slipping so computer sends torque to the front wheels. I don't want to be standing nearby.

GT-R LM Proficient

GT-R LM

Posted
Posted

Mashrock: yeah its true now go back into your room and talk to the little fairies and stuffed toys that talk to you.

Either you have no idea or youve been smockin to much crack

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wazmond
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By Wazmond · Posted

      Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • GTSBoy
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • Wazmond
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By Wazmond · Posted

      So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • tsuokun
      Lets play a game - What is causing my oil consumption?

      By tsuokun · Posted

      Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • 25RBGT
      Got this r31 silhouette flood car to rebuild.

      By 25RBGT · Posted

      Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...