Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb26 In A 32 Gtst


play r 32
 Share

Recommended Posts

hey everyone just chasing some feedback from anyone who has succesfully done the rb26 conversion into a r32 gtst.

how mch did you pay?

what sort of power are you putting out?

how driveable is the car being only RWD?

I will be joining the twin turbo club in about a week when my car comes out of the workshop, so just keen to hear of other peoples experiences.

Cheers. Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i realise this, but when gtrs became cheap i had already spent the money on mine painting it and doing bodykit to make it look the way i want, now it just needs to go fast.. Also while its not the cheapest option building a fast car instead of buying one, it is bloody good fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thats true, as long as you have something to drive for teh few month sits going to be in the shop.

I couldnt see it costing less than 6k and thats if you have pretty good relationship witht he guy doing the work if not its going to be higher. Thing is you tend to think "may as well while im at it" very often which throws costs right up cause nobody wants to do it basic.

Honestly you are better off working on the engine thats in there. The rb25 is not that far off the 26 really and you can get a bunch of power out of it and still have good response if you do it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its an r32, probably only has a rb20 in it..

as for the conversion, its not overly complicated, keep the engine mounts, and mounting plates from the 20, and bolt them to the 26, ecu should not be a massive hassle to wire in the stock unit, at a guess, it'll plug into the factory loom without any mods, tho don't quote me on it, but given its a 32, you'll find rhge primary looms are pretty identical throughout the series, and swapping motors is just a matter of pluuging the 26 ecu/engine loom into the factory loom as is..

things you will run into hassle with..

gearbox, forget using the 20 box, you'll kill it in a flash, you'll need an rb25 box, they're about $1500 atm, to get it mounted without butchering a factory gearbox cross member, chance are, an auto silvia cross member will fit up without having to re-drill or weld tabs on as is normally done, you'll also need to sort out the speedo drive, but a navara speedo drive goes straight in and fixes the issue..

the other big issue is the sump, the standard GT-R sump will not fit, you will need to chop the diff off, smooth it down and weld up the old holes that the front diff shaft leaves when its removed, not an overly complicated task, but it takes a fair while of band sawing and sanding it down..

rought cost estimations..

complete cut about 6k

25 box 1.5k

labour?

if you get a complete cut that has the factory cooler, pipe work etc, it should realistically take a good workshop a few days to remove the 20, remove the 26 from the cut, mod the sump, swap over the required parts and drop it back in...

its a pretty straight forward swap..

add to it an exhaust, a new clutch while its all out, and your on the way..

what you can do to make some money back, is sell off the gt-r box, usually they go for about 1k to 1300 bux depending on condition..

trick to it all is finding a good condition cut, and having it come with all the parts needed, but id say, you'll be up for about 10k all up to pull it off..

Edited by Denver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey denver thanks for all the info mate. Sounds like your pretty clued up on the hole thing. Mine is actually nearly finished, should pick it up next weekend!

I know what your saying boostzor, with the "while im at it" the only extra i got suckered into was a programmable ecu. my cost for the finished project are

complete engine: $5000

labour, including removing rb20 and painting covers candy gold: $2000

A/M ecu $1200

FMIC $200

so im driving out for $8400

I am using redline oil in the RB20 gearbox for now, my mechanic did this with his own 26 powered gts and its been over a year now and still going strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha didnt mean to start an oil brand loyalty war! i didnt realise there was that much difference. Il put the rb20 box to test anway lads and let you know how long it lasts. I could go straight for the bigger box but this is good for experimental purposes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also a fair chunk of weight saving in the GTS-T without the front diff, drive shafts etc compared to the R.

Keep the modifications focused on good low down torque, set the suspension up for traction (plenty of squat) and don't compromise of tyre quality and you'll have a very quick and balanced car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah thats right gav. Ive seen some 26 powered RWDs run some really quick times without huge mods. they sometimes make up for the loss in traction with the weight advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent actually heard form anyone who has already done the conversion. Does this mean there isnt many out there or are you all just keeping quiet so you can sneak around looking like normal gtst's. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent actually heard form anyone who has already done the conversion. Does this mean there isnt many out there or are you all just keeping quiet so you can sneak around looking like normal gtst's. :D

I've done it into an R32 GTS4 if that helps any?

Swapped the motor and gearboxes over and left the GTS4 diffs in place ... has 408rwhp atm and in RWD mode is a bit of a handful :D I think in the end it cost me around the 15k mark but I did a few things like single turbo conversion and PowerFC etc. Good luck with it though - its a shit load of fun as you'll find out :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I've done it into an R32 GTS4 if that helps any?

Swapped the motor and gearboxes over and left the GTS4 diffs in place ... has 408rwhp atm and in RWD mode is a bit of a handful :nyaanyaa: I think in the end it cost me around the 15k mark but I did a few things like single turbo conversion and PowerFC etc. Good luck with it though - its a shit load of fun as you'll find out :rofl:

mine wont quite be that powerful but thats what i was mainly wondering, how much of a handful is it going to be in RWD? Its only a light car. But im sure it will be fun as long as i keep it in one peice haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

been there done that. you'll be in for some fun times for sure.

its been awhile now but i think my std 26 made around 350

with aftermarket management.

and then up to 470 with big single turbo and cams. it was the fastest rwd skyline

in perth running a 11.1 1/4 mile. that may of been beatin not sure.

the conversion is quite straight forward i did mine at home myself.

post-840-1152780329.jpg

Edited by GOT BOOST
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey gotboost. yeah i know your car i have seen it around before. It was one of the cars that inspired me to go for the conversion. So far its going really well. I pick up the microtech ECU tomorow and most of the fiddly things are done like making the oil sump. I am replacing the big end bearings in the motor to be on the safe side. Im hoping to be driving it next weekend at this stage, but these things ALWAYS take longer than expected. Spewing its not done for the cruise!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with regard to the gbox, a friend has a 26 in an r32 gtst with 507rwhp and ran an rb20 box for quite a while. it was daily driven, he did a few track days and took it to the drags once or twice. was only starting to get a bit notchy and noisy after well over a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben you know my car, though its a gts4 most of the process was the same. Good fun in rwd, but the heavier weight is noticable. Makes 310rwhp with pfc.

Total cost for mine

gtr half cut (brakes, box etc) $4000

labour $500

fuel pump $200

cooler $200

so all up about $5000, then power fc, injectors, Z32 afms and tune, so with that about 6k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...