Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After the last track day I had bad brake shudder. It basically went away after a couple of weeks of light city braking.

I've had the wheels off and one rotor is quite grooved and obviously needs machining. The other side seems fine.

Can I and should I machine just that side or is this bad?

Thanks.

In my professional Mechanical Engineers opinion and with over 20 years motor racing and mechanical experience there is no point machining something that doesn't need it as the only imbalance that "may" occur is a slight differential on heat absorption capacity due to the small amount of material lost. As always you must maintain knowledge of the state of your configuration and repair/replace accordingly.

Overhauling a single caliper is an issue of "it depends". If it is several years old without ever having overhaul then yes. If it was done a few races ago and just one is causing problems then no.

Cool.

Now I'm curious as to how it happened.

I always bed my pads in properly and I cool the brakes down properly on track days but on this occasion I was coming off the track and another person was also coming off in front of me. As we pulled in to the pit lane the Clerk of Course stopped the guy in front of me to tell him off for something which meant I was stopped behind him.

Thinking this would only take a few seconds I sat there with hot brakes and my foot on them for probably 1 minute.

It appeared to me that this was where the damage was done and the shuddering started but.. why only one rotor? And, why are there grooves in it and not the other? Do you think the pad had an uneven balance of material or something? I believe the grooves were there before the track day to a slight extent but were massive afterwards.

I run Bendix Ultimates street and track. Thinking of getting some Ferodo DS2500 (I think?)for the track and some other street pad that isn't so dusty.

What occurs with brakes is the driving to aid cooling (air quenching) allows them to retain their homogeneous properties throughout the disc. When you are forced to use your barkes hard and then stop the air can quench the exposed regions and the area covered by the pads cools much slower. This can cause the formation of regions of cementite - a tough slow wearing form of steel which can result in a shudder in the pedal as the other areas wear faster. Often close inspection reveals an outline of the brake pad as a fine line of dark pits on the disc. It can wear out if it is not deep and likewise can be machined out if not too deep but often results in a wrecked disc, even after a really hard stop on the road and then waiting at a light for a few minutes.

The deep grooves would be caused by some hard particles in the pad that have not been evenly distributed during manufacture so causing concentrated wear. While the disc is off place some emery on a flat surface and take the pad back smooth(ish). Bedding is important but remember a few days of city driving can be enough for bedding in too. I always have a couple of laps on the track day to make sure the brakes are warmed and bedded anyway.

If you are at all concerned do both discs at once, but I tend to be able to feel which wheel is a bit funny under brakes so know where to start looking for the problem.

..stating the obvious. But a lot of people mistake pad deposits in the slot as a worn rotor. Technically you actually increase the level of friction if you have pad deposits on the rotor. Grab a small screw driver and run it down the slot. You may find the material in the slot just falls out.

In my professional Mechanical Engineers opinion and with over 20 years motor racing and mechanical experience there is no point machining something that doesn't need it as the only imbalance that "may" occur is a slight differential on heat absorption capacity due to the small amount of material lost. As always you must maintain knowledge of the state of your configuration and repair/replace accordingly.

Overhauling a single caliper is an issue of "it depends". If it is several years old without ever having overhaul then yes. If it was done a few races ago and just one is causing problems then no.

Easy there Geoff.......... I did say "IMHO" ( in my humble opinion ). I didn't say you were wrong !!

And my opinion is not exactly an uneducated one either as I've been an active Motor Mechanic for 22 years ( cutting my teeth on Ferrari's, Lambo's, Porsche's etc ) and an Aircraft Engineer for 19. I have also been working with race cars for around 12 years.

As for the overhaul of one caliper thing, we're talking about an average street car ( no offence Abo Bob ) that would not normally receive the same amount of attention as most race cars ( in the brake department ) and therefore my comment.

Simply put, what I said is what I was taught and is what I practice, and again, is my "opinion" so chill !!

Yeah fair enough Scott. There is a lot of uneducated/unqualified opinion on here and while it is fine from a trade perspective to suggest doing a complete axle at once there is no supporting science to it, even if it is the way you were taught and continued to practice. If Adam or anyone alse is intelligent enough to ask can he do just one without asking why not then I'll respect that and give a yes or no answer. When someone wants to refute with a scientifically unjustifiable claim that then it's time to justify my answer. I also am a mechanic with over 20 years experience but I'm also an Engineer so I only give advice I can support professionally. Mind you if I'm wrong I'll wear that too.

BTW I've never been a fan of Bendix pads, even the ultimates but I do like RB74's from Racebrakes for a street/track pad. I hear good things about the Ferodo pads but haven't tried them. On road rubber on the track I haven't reached the limit of the RB74s during 5-7 lap sessions but with semi's and more power and decent suspension I feel I'm going to find the limit from advice I've received.

LOL...i would personally machine two. At the end of the day when they are worn you are goign to replace them together, so if you machine down a healthy rotor to the same size as your sick rotor it isnt that big a deal.

They are both going in the bin when one of them becomes undersized etc...

...runs and ducks for cover before 60mm artillary rounds hit my bunker :D

Waste of a Javelin missile to use it on a 32 but war makes monsters of us all :D

Jave.gif

Gee, I thought the purpose of this particular thread was to discuss opinions on the machining of 1 brake rotor vs. 2 at a given time and not to put down other car enthusiast's pride and joy ( even if in jest ) :O

Oh so sorry to tread on your feelings there; personal joke between myself and Roy (who knows my background) but feel free to make a martyr of yourself. I considered the discussion finished and the sledging was free to commence judging by previous comments.

Anyway BOT, I'm certain the purpose of the discussion was about saving money and time by only working on what was necessary. So far we have personal thoughts without scientific basis on the matter vs Engineering opinion based on science. The choice now remains up to the reader.

It's probably easy to overlook the fact that one disc is considered fine but throwing a bone here and recalling Scotts earlier correct comment that street cars generally won't get the same attention as a race car there is some value in taking both in for inspection and measurement to determine wear remaining, especially if you are not confident doing this yourself.

Bris you should know better :O

When are you coming over to swill beers? Got anything on Saturday? I'm moving stuff into the new workshop so I can start pulling down an MX-5 head. Some extra muscle would be good and there's all the food and booze you can consume.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam camp bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
×
×
  • Create New...