Jump to content
SAU Community

Ultimate 98


Rosie_1008
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

either way, studies conducted recently said that they expect petrol to run out in 7 years unless new areas are explored. That and the current conflict with places like Iraq puts our petrol demands at an all time high.

Better enjoy your "ultimate" for the next 7 years :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nuhh thats bullshit, theyve been saying that for 20 years, its just used as an excuse so that the fuel companys can keep rising the price...

and really, whoopty f**king doo, in 7 years, oh well jsut spend $1000 odd $ and convert the fuel lines to be able to handle methonol/ethonaol problem solved >_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote form a BP Ultimate brochure:

"BP Ultimate offers advanced engine cleaning performance. it actually cleans your engine as you drive, reducing friction and making it run more efficiently for longer ....... BP Ultimate can prevent as much as 97% of the inlet valve deposits that can form when using regular unleaded .......... test results from dyno testing 2 FPV GT's after the 2 vehicles had run for 7,000k's under identical conditions, the power output of the car running BP Ultimate was 13.8Kw greater..... our testing has shown increases of up to 43kms per tankful on average fuel consumption of 9.5L per 100K's" ... and the story goes on.

Rod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote form a BP Ultimate brochure:

"BP Ultimate offers advanced engine cleaning performance. it actually cleans your engine as you drive, reducing friction and making it run more efficiently for longer ....... BP Ultimate can prevent as much as 97% of the inlet valve deposits that can form when using regular unleaded .......... test results from dyno testing 2 FPV GT's after the 2 vehicles had run for 7,000k's under identical conditions, the power output of the car running BP Ultimate was 13.8Kw greater..... our testing has shown increases of up to 43kms per tankful on average fuel consumption of 9.5L per 100K's" ... and the story goes on.

Rod

Thats all well and good but i wont to know HOW they got the 13.8kw increase.

Were they able to advance the ignition due ot knock levels being lower than before, were the FPV's the turbo model and they increased boost (if so then other mods required) its all well and goood saying that they had a 13.8kw increase but i for one would like to know how they found the additional power and also some dyno charts overlapping there runs.

As for the 43kms increase per tank full, again this can all come down to the tune.

When i first had my car going i was lucky to see 2ks to 10L and it was an expensive car to fill (hence why i didn't drive it much) but after a tune i saw a remarkable difference with fuel economy (i actually had economy :( )

Before the old girl went pop i was about to get 100K's from about 8L driving normally to and from work.

I was able to get 100K's from about 13-15L with gate (:wave: mmmmmmmmmm gate)

Obviously its going to make a HUGE difference with the extra RON and this will inturn let people tune there cars for more ignition and boost and if need be more fuel.

Bring it on i say and its long overdue but i would still like to see there data from tehre testing.

BP Ultimate isn't something new (it obvioulsy is to Tassie :eerm:) but its been around for a while on the mainland and i cant see that they would of changed anything to bring it to the Apple Isle.

Cheers GMB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not sure if id worry about using it on a stock motor like mine. especialy when i only realy drive it to work. and the extra kms you get per tank would have to be added up against cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Little more work!  Did some body work on the rear wheel arches and since the paint was a cheap spray job before figured I’d do something to tide me over until I wrap the car.    Colour might not be everyone’s choice but I like it and it’s only temporary, just hate having primer from the wheel arches standing out.    Keeping an eye out for a decent set of wheels to throw on now. Wheels and tires on the car are junk
    • Its likely to be 70% road 30% track usage, track usage will increase if anything. Decided not to fit it as I cant be arsed changing the bushes on my LCAs again 🤣 I did get the below back from GKTech though so they should work together     The anti-squat kit and roll center adjusters work independently since they change the rear lower control arm's angle in different ways. The anti-squat kit adjusts the angle from front to back, which impacts anti-squat values. Roll center adjusters change the angle side to side, mainly to correct geometry on cars that are significantly lowered. They might affect each other a tiny bit, but overall, you can think of them as separate.
    • What are you doing with the car? street car or race car? People get hung up on the squat of the s/r chassis rears. There is positives to the squat if a car is setup and driven correctly for it (correct ride height, spring rate, alignment, damper valving). Generally just lengthen the rear traction arm by 5-10mm and that will help the squat and bump steer too. You are also correct with the roll centre too. This too also needs to be adjustable if you start messing with suspension geometry.   Having done quiet a bit of testing on race cars this year in regards to rear squat, I've seen some big positives from it in regards to drive off corners and traction. 
    • I find I am using the MX5 for everything except long overnight cruises with Jackie, or, if picking up the kids to go somewhere, the SS has so much more room inside, and is much more comfortable if your going to be doing Hwy driving for 6-8 hours And the MX5 isn't bad in stop go traffic for a manual transmission car, whilst the clutch kit has been upgraded from stock, it is still light, and also not having a stupidly light flywheel in it helps as well, I've spent alot of time sitting on the M5, M4 and M7 stuck in traffic when plodding around the Greater Sydney Region in it Another benefit is MX5's are not really a car that gets stolen, you can pretty much park it anywhere, and it will still be there when you return
    • I can totally get why you like it for that sort of commute. I was thinking BoganDore because it's such a lazy drive, for things like stop start traffic.   I used to do over an hour in stop start shit from one side of Bris to the next, twice a day. My choice of car was larger displacement, with an auto. Basically for torque in low rpm/very low speed, and no clutch pedal. But loved a fun manual for the weekends, which the partner has (plus had the LandCruiser too for other fun drives). I now have an EV as a work car, and I tell ya what, ultimate daily driver, especially if youre out of energy, like I often am after work. I don't even need to touch the brake pedal   That said, I'm presently rebuilding the Liberty GTB to get it setup for weekend drives and track abuse! So small high revving turbo engine with 6 speed cog swapper!   But for your style of commute, I'd probably take the MX5 too!   For those choices, I'm ignoring fuel economy. Because I know how atrocious V8 daily life is for fuel from when I used to daily a manual SS, ha ha. Hence why I know I love the daily rumble of a V8
×
×
  • Create New...