Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to the worlds of skyline as I use to own a s13 turbo, and I have a r34 gtt coming in about 3 months time, just wondering what difference is the r34 rb25det neo and the r33 version of the rb25det? what is this neo thing? also what turbo does the r34 have? and is it ball bearing? sorry bout the noob quest, but since im moving to a skyline now, i wanna know as much about them biggrin.gif also any other cool features or anything about r34s that u guys can tell me?

It is ball bearing, and ceramic exhaust, nylon intake. The housing is a bit bigger apparently.

The R34 put out 206kw

The R33 put out 187kw

Slightly bigger turbo, slightly bigger intercooler... i'm sure there's a few more differences, but those are the main ones that I know of.

yeah r34 have a slightly bigger turbo, but depending on what series r33 motor it is, will determine if it has a nylon compressor wheel (series 2 r33 has it). from what i gather the r33 motor is a little bit better. something to do with the vct or something.

you will find the rb25 motor a lot different to (i'm assuming you had an sr20 motor) the s13. if your motor was relativevly stock (e.g. stock turbo, just with more boost, exhaust, fmic), you will find the rb25 pulls a lot more down low. i had a 180sx with an sr20det in it, and it was rather sluggish down low compared to my girlfriends car (sss pulsar- natro sr20 with 112hp atw). they pull once they come on boost at about 4000rpm. the rb25 having a ballbearing turbo starts to boost a lot earlier and pulls a lot harder down low and are a lot smoother through the rev range.

Hey mate,

interesting thread but this has been covered before I think...

I didnt think the R34 had a ball bearing turbo, just thought it was a little larger... Can anyone confirm this?

Anyhow, heres what im quite sure of....

-They have slightly larger intercoolers

-Variable cam timing on both the inlet and exhaust cams (as opposed to only the inlet which the r33 rb25det has)

- Solid type lifters (same setup as Rb26)

- Different shaped inlet manifold

R34 is 206kw R33 is 187kw.

R34 Rb25DET has

*larger intercooler,

*solid lifters like GTR,

*different cam profiles,

*constantly adjustable variable valve timing on inlet (not just advance or retard 10deg like R33 RB25, R34 can vary it up to 40 odd degress and anywhere in between)

*traction control

*larger turbine housing on turbo (otherwise same as series 2 R33 turbo)

*larger top feed injectors (instead of side feed)

can't think of what else is different at the moment?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just don't use ChatGPT or any other artificial stupidity for the equivalent of googling. Their demonstrated inability to discriminate reality from hallucination should be enough to make them totally untrusted. LLMs don't know anything and cannot think to even the smallest extent. They are just predictors of the next word, and that should never be confused with capability.
    • I think, given the usage model described in the OP, I'd never ever experience the wonders of the 400kW upgrade. What I really need is boost from 2000rpm and probably no more than 260-270rwkW. But I suspect that the highflow is not actually the turbo for that purpose, so I may in fact need to get a G25 or 30 or something right sized and very spooly. We shall see after it is tuned. I've had to back the boost and boost ramp off to stop the thing from pinging since the highflow went on, so I've been almost living the NA life for 9 months now! Injectors are recently in hand. AFM is in hand. Dyno is fixed. Just need to clear a queue of f**king Supras out of the way (and probably fit my new gearbox). So....some time this year? Lol.
    • For what I gather is a Sunday/summer car....braided is fine. You're not going to be left without a vehicle and you have plenty of time for inspection/maintenance. Oof. I wouldn't use them that way. They can probably handle the temperature** but the internal corrugations means that their flow characteristics are a bit shit. Lots of extra friction and pressure loss. Makes them flow like the next pipe size down. ** They are stainless, and the stainless can usually be at least something like 304L, which is pretty good at higher temperatures (unlike 316L, which I would use for a wrt/corrosive environment, but not a particularly hot environment). But the welding needs to be top notch. And even then, because you usually need at least one cone-seat end on them (because you can twist the hose and do up both ends at the same time unless one of them is a union) they can be prone to coming loose with heat cycles.
    • I don't have the OEM oil feed lines though and the turbo-wraparound line is torn, only has water. My plan is to get replacements for these and just connect a braided line to there. And make sure it's leak free. Hoses like these are also sometimes used to connect external wastegates, so for an EGR I think you're good using them.
    • Alright I understand. The most likely case is probably gonna be that I just keep the OEM unit in the car as long as it works.
×
×
  • Create New...