Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

In the last few days, I have been thinking about NA-T projects on a JZA80. I'm not ready yet, but thought I'd weight up the prices and facts first.

In my research, I have looked at as many threads as possible on the supraforums and the SAU forums to see how other people have gone.

Seems alot of people keep going on with this "My mechanic said you can't turbo a NA engine", utter BS!

At this point I bring my current ride to the table, a SR20DE, with yes, a TURBO added. It has a T28BB turbo, a SS manifold, Microtech ECU (was actually running standard SR20DET ECU for a while), runs 9psi daily. Was a drift car, so driven pretty hard, then I bought it and only added the microtech. Its been going strong for well over a year, producing over 150RWKWs at 9psi the whole time. (Which isn't bad for an SR).

So it would be really goog to have some thread or something for all the people running succesful NA-T engines, rather than hearing from people who:

a) Haven't tried and are just repeating what has been told to them; or

b) Have actually tried or know of someone who has, but the tuner didn't know what he/she was doing and things went wrong.

I can tell you from my experience, my everyday driver is great to drive, very responsive with the high comp and being caught of boost isn't so much of an issue, then when boost comes on, it runs great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have never heard of a mechanic saying "it can't be done"

what we generally recommend is this:

- nissan made non-turbo and turbo versions of the skyline

- they differed not only in the turbo, but in many other areas too: brakes etc.

- how much will it cost to change to a turbo configurastion? consider turbo, manifold, ecu, loom, dash. then, you still are missing things like brakes, hicas, lsd that the turbo model has standard

- is it worth the cost, or simlpy easier to sell your NA nad buy a turbo model that has it all as stock?

I has an NA supra (MA70) and considered doing a turbo addition. Then i considered an engine swap. It ended up being the easiest to sell it and buy a turbo car. Thus, my R32 turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2318035
Share on other sites

on a jza80 im assuming its got a 2jzge engine like my ex gfs soarer has

if u were to do this id suggest a head change as the n/a one is pretty shitful n there is a nice dizzy that takes up alot of room in the engine bay on the exhaust side. plus the plenum is like an rb20/25 one that runs across the engine

but there is no reason y it cant b done on any engine, just dont try to run anything over 1 bar of boost at all unless uve decomp'd the engine enough

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2323341
Share on other sites

i have never heard of a mechanic saying "it can't be done"

what we generally recommend is this:

- nissan made non-turbo and turbo versions of the skyline

- they differed not only in the turbo, but in many other areas too: brakes etc.

- how much will it cost to change to a turbo configurastion? consider turbo, manifold, ecu, loom, dash. then, you still are missing things like brakes, hicas, lsd that the turbo model has standard

- is it worth the cost, or simlpy easier to sell your NA nad buy a turbo model that has it all as stock?

I has an NA supra (MA70) and considered doing a turbo addition. Then i considered an engine swap. It ended up being the easiest to sell it and buy a turbo car. Thus, my R32 turbo.

I've actually been thru the engine conversion also.

From my experience as a consumer, neither way is ever as easy as people say.

You don't WACK a turbo on the side.

You don't WACK an engine in an engine bay.

Some projects turn out better than others. Some people say its not meant to have a turbo on that engine. Thats right, and the GTR comes with a specific size turbo. its not MEANT to have that changed either. Some engines when tuned well, can handle more boost than they did from the factory.

I would just like to see a list of peoples results to see other satisfied Na-T people. Its fair to the people considering that option to see the full story.

ps - about the swapping heads, there is alot to be said for doing that. Injectors for one, on the 2J, you got the inlet manifold and the dizzy also. my point is more about bottom ends being strong enough to handle boost. My SR20 has the turbo head.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2323502
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
ill be doing the SR20DE-t conversion soon on our N15SSS

see how far i can push the high comp motor till she dies :)

ill post the results here once its done

its been done with excellent results on factory compression ratio. The issue you'll have is blowing 3rd gear and traction without an LSD. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2349175
Share on other sites

i have never heard of a mechanic saying "it can't be done"

what we generally recommend is this:

- nissan made non-turbo and turbo versions of the skyline

- they differed not only in the turbo, but in many other areas too: brakes etc.

- how much will it cost to change to a turbo configurastion? consider turbo, manifold, ecu, loom, dash. then, you still are missing things like brakes, hicas, lsd that the turbo model has standard

- is it worth the cost, or simlpy easier to sell your NA nad buy a turbo model that has it all as stock?

I has an NA supra (MA70) and considered doing a turbo addition. Then i considered an engine swap. It ended up being the easiest to sell it and buy a turbo car. Thus, my R32 turbo.

wat if u did the turbo conversion to a gts4?.......gtr drivetrain??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2367418
Share on other sites

Because NA engine arn't designed to run boost, hance the higher compression on NA engine. Put some positive boost into the old girl, and you'll end up splashing all your oil and a piston or two on the road.

If you were to run positive boost on an NA engine, it would be wise not to go above 5psi, though running that little boost would decimate most turbo's cause of the already high compression from the NA engine.

If your interested in running boost, if would be best to purchase a decompresion head gasket (possibly copper, but not always) to run anything over 5psi.

On that note, running 5psi on an NA engine, and driving her hard all day, you'd end up pushing out a few pistons onto the road again. so you have to be careful. Some engine are different to others though, so if you dont try you'll never know!

Aswell as, if you were to turbo your car (In QLD anyway) you have to upgrade the brakes to the right size, for eq; Id turbo my Silva (Rb20DE) Id have to upgrade to the R32 5 stud brakes to comply with ADR rules, and be able to get it mod plated for the turbo.

On top of that, The gearbox would need to be replaced, and the dif. After driving it around for a while, you'd end up blowing them both.

Its cheaper to just buy a factory turbo, and not bother turbo'ing an NA car.

On top of the turbo, you have;

Dump pipe,

intercooler piping

exhaust,

brakes,

steering alignment,

wheel alignment,

wheels, :)

gearbox,

tailshaft (If need be)

diff,

Hicas,

ECU,

wiring loom,

plugs,

injectors,

fuel pump,

probably a fuel regulator,

compliance and,

Mod plates.

Its really not worth it in my opinion!

Edited by Rancher
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2386393
Share on other sites

Because NA engine arn't designed to run boost, hance the higher compression on NA engine. Put some positive boost into the old girl, and you'll end up splashing all your oil and a piston or two on the road.

If you were to run positive boost on an NA engine, it would be wise not to go above 5psi, though running that little boost would decimate most turbo's cause of the already high compression from the NA engine.

If your interested in running boost, if would be best to purchase a decompresion head gasket (possibly copper, but not always) to run anything over 5psi.

On that note, running 5psi on an NA engine, and driving her hard all day, you'd end up pushing out a few pistons onto the road again. so you have to be careful. Some engine are different to others though, so if you dont try you'll never know!

Aswell as, if you were to turbo your car (In QLD anyway) you have to upgrade the brakes to the right size, for eq; Id turbo my Silva (Rb20DE) Id have to upgrade to the R32 5 stud brakes to comply with ADR rules, and be able to get it mod plated for the turbo.

On top of that, The gearbox would need to be replaced, and the dif. After driving it around for a while, you'd end up blowing them both.

Its cheaper to just buy a factory turbo, and not bother turbo'ing an NA car.

On top of the turbo, you have;

Dump pipe,

intercooler piping

exhaust,

brakes,

steering alignment,

wheel alignment,

wheels, :P

gearbox,

tailshaft (If need be)

diff,

Hicas,

ECU,

wiring loom,

plugs,

injectors,

fuel pump,

probably a fuel regulator,

compliance and,

Mod plates.

Its really not worth it in my opinion!

Didn't cost me much to do, my car went hard for 50,000+ kms and as far as I know is still going strong!!!

And wtf would anyone be stupid enough to put HICAS in, it's nothing but a severe annoyance..I'm looking at putting a HICAS lock on to prevent stupidly easy wheelspin due to the wheels constantly being out of geometry.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2386789
Share on other sites

Because NA engine arn't designed to run boost, hance the higher compression on NA engine. Put some positive boost into the old girl, and you'll end up splashing all your oil and a piston or two on the road.
not designed to run boost how?? because of higher compression? compression is your friend!!
If you were to run positive boost on an NA engine, it would be wise not to go above 5psi, though running that little boost would decimate most turbo's cause of the already high compression from the NA engine.
ok so should i be worried about my 10.2:1 compression and running 20-22psi on pump fuel? will my GT42RS decimate?

you need to spend less time listening to people with no idea

If your interested in running boost, if would be best to purchase a decompresion head gasket (possibly copper, but not always) to run anything over 5psi.
familiar with the term quench??
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125512-na-t-results/#findComment-2387959
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
    • As well as being risky WRT tipping off anyway. Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to move. Just measure from the rear one to the front one on the good side, then measure that same length on the wrecked side. You will find the notches in the pinchweld, and the jacking pad. Just spray a spot of marker paint or something there.
×
×
  • Create New...