Jump to content
SAU Community

Stock R33GTSt rwkw??

Grim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Grim Proficient

Grim

Posted
Posted

What rwkw does a completely stock R33 put down?? We've got the Melbourne SAU Dyno Day this Saturday and I'm curious what to expect from my stock R33. If they claim 187kw at the flywheel what can I expect on the dyno?

The only mod I've got is a Apexi SAFC which is getting tuned on Saturday so it'll be interesting to see what the SAFC alone does compared to stock R33.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/
Share on other sites
whatsisname Grand Master

whatsisname

Posted
Posted

I've watched well over 20 stock or near too R33 GTS25t's being dyno tuned, this is including @ least 8 different Dyno Dynamics dyno's (in 3 states), & based on what I've seen I'd say ~120-130rwkw is about the average for the breed :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/#findComment-25289
Share on other sites
diduc Collaborator

diduc

Posted
Posted

hey matt regarding my very light mods i've done 173.1rwkw@CAS on 12psi. Had ignition sensor problem with unichip due to age(not your fault i stressed). With new unichip done 178rwkw due to better ignition timing. anyway my internet been down for a while so here's my stats,

turbosmart 1 bv & type 2 bov

FMIC 600*300*75

02rush panel filter

unichip

173.1rwkw@12psi

~240kw

think got the power bug as not satisfied.

:(

ps done any times with your beast?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/#findComment-25418
Share on other sites
whatsisname Grand Master

whatsisname

Posted
Posted

G'day Nath,

How are ya'? Long time no hear :(

Ahhhh shit :( did you have to buy another new UC?! Oh no! :) Was it the age of the UC or crank angle sensor? I'm glad you've got it all sorted now, but I still feel bad :(

173.1 - 178rwkw on only 12psi is a great result mate! + it basically matches my rwkw level with the same kind of mod's!. I went from 173rwkw to 183rwkw after replacing a Turbosmart bleed with a HKS EVC.

Jim's an awesome ECU tuner when it comes to Skylines, if there's power to be found in the ECU mapping he'll find it.

:lol: Yep mate you've been infected by the power bug :D I told ya' you would didn't I! :lol:

No I haven't hit the strip for ages! I'll eventually get some new times.

Matt.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/#findComment-25578
Share on other sites
diduc Collaborator

diduc

Posted
Posted
Ahhhh shit  did you have to buy another new UC?! Oh no!  Was it the age of the UC or crank angle sensor? I'm glad you've got it all sorted now, but I still feel bad  

no i got ur one, yeah its the crank sensor signal, jim has to use a new unichip then downloaded the map to my one.

i'm happy but powerwise i need more more. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/#findComment-26165
Share on other sites
whatsisname Grand Master

whatsisname

Posted
Posted

3" down to 2.5" Doh! :O Back pressure is more important with NA engines, forced induction engines just need those waste gases out as fast as possible! 3+" all the way through. Never mind, it won't take much to replace the 2.5" section later down the track.

OK, so you didn't need to buy a new UC, that's cool then :O

:lol: I bet this time next yr you'll have 200+rwkw & still looking for more :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1256-stock-r33gtst-rwkw/#findComment-26199
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • joshuaho96
      How "plug and play" is the Haltech Pro for R33 GTST

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • GTSBoy
      NC MX5

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      NC MX5

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • r32-25t
      NC MX5

      By r32-25t · Posted

      I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...