Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1989 Nissan Skyline BNR32 GTR

130,000kms

Modifications include:

HKS 2530 turbo chargers (640hp)

HKS Turbo dump pipes

HKS Actuators

HKS Air filters

HKS Fuel rail & injectors

Malpassi fuel pressure regulator

Apex`i Power FC computer and commander (hand held controller)

Apex`i boost control kit for the Power FC

100mm thick intercooler

Nismo coppermix twin plate clutch (latest version)

Nismo aluminium radiator

N1 front bar vents

Twin custom 3” front pipes, into 3.5” exhaust system

Turbo timer

R33 V-Spec differential

R33 gearbox (fitted last week, opened and inspected, low kms, A1 cond)

Cusco brake master stopper

Cusco oversize sway bars

Cusco rear strut brace

Front strut brace

Billstein adjustable suspension

17x9 Rays engineering TE37's

4WD/2WD in-cabin switch

Pioneer CD player

MOMO ‘race’ steering wheel

Reflective tinted windows

This car has recently been dyno tuned to 556hp @ 1.2bar and the power output chart from this tune can be provided. In 2005, tuned to to 260KW at the wheels, the previous owner ran a 11.8sec quarter mile , the car hasn't been re-run since the recent modifications.

As it is, this is a very fast and drivable car while still retaining it's factory look and feel.

Over $15,000 spent in modifications in the last 6 months, I am currently building a track car and need more cash to do so.

Asking $27,500 with 3 months rego

I am interested in swapping for a RWD turbo nissan for a daily driver

Contact Phil on 0402448987 for any further details/interest ([email protected]) - Located in Adelaide, SA

Thanks

post-3402-1153036983.jpg

post-3402-1153037009.jpg

post-3402-1153037036.jpg

Edited by Crimmo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126330-1989-nissan-skyline-bnr32-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...