Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Will be very interseted to see how your kit works out. If you have any problems or if all smooth sailing.

I don't expect to see my kit for about 3 weeks so I have time to upgrade the fuel pump, injectors, AFM, front pipe and dump pipe, intercooler, air box, brakes and coil overs.

I will let you all know how how it comes along..

:wave:

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah well I'm in the same boat too but I ordered the HKS GTRS. It should be here sometime this week from nengun. Could be a few weeks yet till I can install it but it should be a well worth the wait.

Any news on your setup? Results, whether you have cam gears etc?

Thats why i was asking. Also do you have a cat, and what brand and diam is the exhaust?

nah, no cat and like i said i just got a new custom exhaust (cat back) 2 months ago, its 3inch, 1 centre muffler and last 50cm is 4inch :rofl:

Sam reckons that cam gears will make a big difference in boost response, so i'll be getting a set soon....

you don't have a cat either do you?

I have a catalytic converter, a 3' Catco. I take it out for track work, but hasnt been back in since Dutton. Only takes 10 minutes and 4 bolts. Keeping killing gaskets though changing it in and out all the time, need new gaskets for when i put the cat back in otherwise im going to have a leak:(

Ok, so the breathing on your engine was pretty on the money then. Was thinking more and more about it last night...i dont think i want to get rid of the RB20+TD06 combo. Its too good value :rofl:

Well the turbo is on and i coldn't be happier.

As for results I really haven't had alot of time to do much since I ftted the turbo and at the moment I am trying to sort out rego changeover from QLD to NSW and the car goes in shortley to sort out a pod filter box/partition and a blueslip etc. :rofl:

The boost starts round 2 k and full boost is around 4k but the tune is a little lean between 2.5k and 3.5k so the turbo isn't comeing on as quickly as it can(old tune for old ITS turbo). Top end is not bad I can say.

Once that is all sorted I'll organise a dyno run for a couple of 15psi and 20psi runs.

Have no idea on what the results will be like to be honest.

In my opinion the HKS GT-RS a perfect upgrade for the RB20.

For 2.6k delivered you cantgo wrong.

So yeah sorry I can't help ya's out much yet. :D

..i dont think i want to get rid of the RB20+TD06 combo. Its too good value :D

after last night, i don't think you can really get any better package then what you already have for a RB20 :rofl:

244rwkw with response of a GTRS is pretty much as good as your gonna get.....i mean without going the rb25 route, you will have to spend alot of $$ for not much more gain.....however, some nice 264 cams would no doubt make things interesting :D

I have a catalytic converter, a 3' Catco. I take it out for track work, but hasnt been back in since Dutton. Only takes 10 minutes and 4 bolts. Keeping killing gaskets though changing it in and out all the time, need new gaskets for when i put the cat back in otherwise im going to have a leak:(

Ok, so the breathing on your engine was pretty on the money then. Was thinking more and more about it last night...i dont think i want to get rid of the RB20+TD06 combo. Its too good value :P

I remember Sydneykid saying that a straight pipe makes up to 10rwkw more than a gutted cat , because the flow is straight instead of expanding into a chamber and then narrowing back to 3"......

hmm, maybe i need to try straight pipe :sorcerer:

Ive paid for the cams, should not be too far away, but i dont think i want to spend the money on getting them installed and the car tuned, Thats over $1000 put towards better things, like hookers.

Though if i can get a good time at Sandown next year, it will be tempting to front the cash for install, good fuel and 1,6bar and a tow home :P Piss funny if the little girl can keep pace with some of the more powerful cars.. (I am dreaming :) )

The real surprise is at 4,000rpm you have about 100rwkws and i have 135rwkws. And my peak torque is 506ft.lbs at about 4,900rpm but you make your peak torque of 416ft.lbs at 5,400rpm. It would be interesting to see the torque curves, mine is making a boat load more torque a lot earlier.

...did i say get some cam gears and dyno time :cheers:

So much for Greddy turbos being old truck turbos :cheers:

hmm, maybe i need to try straight pipe :sorcerer:

do it :P

this thread has been pretty interesting

the GT-RS definitley looks like a good upgrade

I'm currently using a td05h 16g, but i want to upgrade to something ball bearing in the future

i was thinking either the 2871r/26r or the 3071r

ive heard lots of bad things about the 3071r though, something about the exhaust housing..?

Just pay a bit of money and get your TD05 high flowed with a 20G compressor :P

THe td05 compressor housing is really ineffecient though

i'd need to get an 06 comp. cover

and in the end its still not ball bearing

although, the results your 20g has given give me a lot of faith in the greddy/trust turbos

meh to ball bearing. There is much more to them. HKS rate it at 400ps, Greddy the 20G at 420hp. And the 20G is (in this case) more responsive making power sooner. The boost plots are basically the same, but the actual torque and engine power is better with the 20G. Explain that???

According to HKS USA

HKS GT-RS - 400 PS Output

COMPRESSOR:

-Wheel- 52 Trim - 51.2 Inducer / 71.1 Major

-Housing- 60 Inlet / 50 Outlet - 0.60 A/R

TURBINE:

-Wheel- 76 Trim - 53.8 Major / 47.0 Exducer

-Housing- GT25 inlet / Internal GT25 outlet; 0.64 A/R

Greddy TD06-20G - 420hp Output

COMPRESSOR:

-Wheel- 60 Trim - 52.6 Inducer / 68 Major

-Housing- TD06 housing

TURBINE:

-Wheel- TD06S6 Trim - 65 Major / 55.1 Exducer

-Housing- TD06S 3 bolt 8cm

So for some reason the wheels in the 20G just get the job done :P

meh to ball bearing. There is much more to them. HKS rate it at 400ps, Greddy the 20G at 420hp. And the 20G is (in this case) more responsive making power sooner. The boost plots are basically the same, but the actual torque and engine power is better with the 20G. Explain that???

? easy.

-your using 3psi more than me.

-your a/f ratios are far leaner than mine, you had close to 13:1 afr.

-External gate will always make more power because of less restriction

-you have tuned lenght s/s manifold. and i have stock cast.

-you have properly tuned cam gears...

& even in rwd my gts4 will have more drivetrain loss than a true rwd.

that will account for more kw than the actual turbo sizes. :P

All good points, but im not talkign about peak powre. I will be interesting to see if cam gears can pick you up 35rwkws in the mid range and get you almost 100lb.ft of torque a few hundred rpm earlier.

Peak power im not too fussed about. If you wound your boost up to what i run you woudl have bagged in the 230+.

Just trying to make the point, the response of a turbo has more to do with wheels etc etc then whether its ball bearing

All good points, but im not talkign about peak powre. I will be interesting to see if cam gears can pick you up 35rwkws in the mid range and get you almost 100lb.ft of torque a few hundred rpm earlier.

35rwkw! haha no way, if i get an extra 10-15rwkw i'll be more than happy :P

The main thing is to get boost sooner....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I can do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
    • Incidentally, I also put v3 of the tune on the car and did an oil change from 5w20 to 5w40 to see how it affected oil pressure in the mid to high end. I'm still happier with the thicker oil and will stick with it, but clearly the system is happy with 55psi even if I'm not! It's well within the service manual specs...but they are very open
×
×
  • Create New...