Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest acxacx

I Have a R32 GTR and I've Installed X-Force Dump Pipes, I have noticed that fitting the rear turbo intake aluminium pipe, fouls against the front turbo x-force dump pipe. i.e just touching it. Is there an alternative to maintain at least 10-15 mm clearance, are there any adaptors available. Can anyone please provide me with some advise. Because the way it is now, if the engine runs there is a posibility that the heat from the x-force dump pipe will melt the aluminium turbo intake. Your urgent reply would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126521-x-force-dump-pipes/
Share on other sites

without being rude

DONT FIT X FORCE DUMP PIPES TO GTR'S

in my opinion they are ok on gtsts as when they warp etc they are easy to remove etc

on a gtr put a set of decent ones on there or just dont bother!unless you like pulling turbos off your gtr which i shouldnt think anyone would be to fond of the second time around:)

I'm a mechanical draftsman by trade, and deal with stainless steel quite a bit. I am unsure what grade S/S the X-Force items are but when I saw a GTST example up close it appeared that the steel used and alot of impurities in it compared to most of the Australian stuff we deal with. Most places use at least 304 S/S which is the most widely available, but still not ideally suited to high temp applications when comparing to 409 S/S which is used in most of the more expensive/quality shops (Di Fillipo for example). I suggest you remove the dump pipe and sell it and have a quality item fabricated, or purchase another from a well known/trusted brand. As someone else said in an earlier post the dump pipe may warp, and this is characteristic of most stainless steel, and certainly more so for a cheaper grade such as the x-force item.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...