Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay people, first of all, I'm new here so hi hows it going etc.. Now down to buisiness. I've heard a lot of bad things about the RB20DET such as "high performance examples suffer from extreme lag" or "totally gutless down low" etc.

Now I've owned a R31 for a year, (well used to, its a long story), with the RB30E, with a cam, chip, exhaust. extractors, pod etc, probably pushing around 100rwkw. Now that car is gone and im looking at upgrading while I have the chance. Im very interested in buying a R32 gts-t coupe. But the problem is, the car will see occasional track duties and will be considerably track orientated, (as much as possible while staying street legal), aiming for about 250rwkw. And from what I've heard at his power level, the rb20 will be fairly laggy. Basically i need power on tap at every point around a track, particulary coming out of corners at maybe 3500-4000rpm or so, will there be sufficient power at this point in the rev range with 250rwkw to remain responsive and competitive. If so I will buy the gts-t no problems as i love every other aspect of the car.

Also, what rpm can a stock rb20det safely rev to.

Or should I just pay the extra cash for a rb30DETT, basically looking for neck snapping response form a decent way down, say 3500 to redline, the response/torque comes before peak power, but still has to have decent power to be competitive.

Cheers

Edited by Stone in Focus
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127131-rb20det-lag-monster/
Share on other sites

if you want 250rwkw, then you will not have much power at 3500-4000rpm. Infact you will have bugger all.

I had a shitty highflow that made 210rwkw and that didn't hit full boost till almost 5000rpm....if you want good response you will need at least a RB25 to achieve 250rwkw...

you can safely rev a rb20 to 7500 after that its your risk..

Sure can but youll have clearance issue with intercooler pipng etc etc

My RB20 doesnt hit full boost till bout 5500rpm however if you get a good tune and a decent set of cams you could bring it down to 4000ish.

RB20's will rev to 9,000 if you want them to :P but under 8,000 safer.

Really depends on budget a well setup RB25 will see 250rwkw, full boost by 2,500 and bounce off red all day long..... again budget issue.

Piping clearence isnt an issue as I can fabricate most things.

Well if I'm going to be swapping the rb20 for a 25, i might as well put the 25 head on a 30 block and put that in.

Anyone know the availability and price of r32 coupe rolling shells?

I had a shitty highflow that made 210rwkw and that didn't hit full boost till almost 5000rpm....if you want good response you will need at least a RB25 to achieve 250rwkw...

I think thats not a good example of how a well setup rb20 will perform. as he said, it was a shitty highflow. If you look at sticky threads, you'll see how the cars develop power.... and from what i've understoodd are not incredibly laggy as some people will have you believe. Obviously cam gears will change the how the car develops power, and are a good investment. The revlimiter on my Rb20 was set at 8200, but hardly ever saw that many revs as it stopped making power at 7200-7500rpm, however you need overrev and most people have them set at 7800-8000rpm.

If you wanted slightly less power, you could always go the 2530 track... Makes a fairly easy 220rwkw with awesome boost response

Edited by Cool Hand Luke

Get out of my thread biatch!

LOL, nah just kidding.

Yeah I saw those graphs in the stickies and some seem to go almost straight up!

I'll keep on researching I guess..

I've noticed that rb20's are cheap as so i guess if i change my mind i wont be losing out too badly. But i would like to make sure they can offer what im looking for first. My main concern is slow corner exits. Does anyone here race a rb20, how do you find its response out of corners, what setup and power are you running?

Cheers guys

^^^ pm 'roy' on these forums. He regularly takes his 32 RB20 out on tracks and i'm sure he can answer all your q's.

i think he's making 235rwkw with a TD06 8cm on a highmount trust manifold....

edit: do a search he's pretty active on the forums...

here you go: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...=126750&hl=

Throw a set of rb25/26 rods and an rb26 crank in to the rb20 that will have it spooling earlier, then shove boost down its throat. :)

The rb30 works out too expensive if you want it too rev + your likely to overshoot your 250rwkw by a fair margin.

LOL..Roy = Minister of RB20 propaganda :)

Firstly, what state are you in. My car will be back on the road in about 2 weeks, and best thing is to take it for a drive and see what you think. Its a long way from the optimum/best set up...but its fun :)

RB20 and track work. Well the RB20 is in my eyes the strongest RB engine getting around. So makes for a good basis for a track engine. I think its the strongest because of the gear Nissan put in it, combined with the power ppl typically extract from them means they are never really leaned on. They take a licking and if you keep servicing up to them then they will tick along for a hell of a long time

So they are strong, next thing is they are cheap. For a short motor you are looking between $400-600. So if a pressure line drops of the fuel rail, or bad luck strikes then you are not in a big $$$ hole

They also lend themselves well to mods with an ECU that can be tuned...lower compression then RB25, short stroke so they rev well...and did i mention they rev :devil:

And they also make reasonable power. These days the bar is so high, 300rwkws seems common for the RB26/26/30 boys. But the way i look at it is a GT3 Porsche has what, about 240rwkws? Ok it is damn responsive and grunty everywhere...but still its about the power you need for what i consider to be a quick car :spank:

Now you will have realised i havent discussed the response thing :) Well it sounds like you already know that they are not great. Lower compression then the RB25, and 500cc smaller...its kinda expected.

But here is the thing, take the car to the track and see how it compares to the bigger engined cars. Where they wheelspin out of corners with insatant hits of torque to the tyres...i can just flatten the thing and by the time its hits full boost im normally about that point of corner exit that it wont fry tyres.

At the moment i havent really had too many good runs at tracks with problems wiht cars, wet weather etc, but in my one go in the dry at Sandown i have done a 1:25, which i think is reasonable for a first go.

The car can still go another 2-3 seconds quicker with more laps and gettign to know the track. So in my eyes thats pretty quick. If 330-350rwkws GTRs with a fair amount of engine, brake and suspension work are doing 1:20-1:21s, then im happy for a completely internally std RB20 with a Trust kit do be 1-2 seconds slower. :)

As for putting a std RB25 in there? Well im not abig fan of that. Just remember you need a gearbox as well, etc etc. They are no doubt better, but the cost to me doesnt justify the expense in a track car. It will sound silly but on the street, i can see the sense as it makes the car zoomier. But on the track, what the slowest corner? 55-60km/h? Thats boost in 2nd gear so not a real issue.

For a 3,750rpm power band i average something like 215-220 rwkws so its a good wide power band. 2nd gear i rev to 8,200-8,300 rpm, but with the higher upshifts dont have to rev it so hard as the revs drop less from 3rd to 4th and 4th to 5th.

And because im tired and being a smart ass there is yet to be a quicker RB25 powered car at the track. Actualy i lie, Lee Wilson, the son of the owner of AVO was 2 seconds quicker at Sandown, but i can live with that. By the time i get back there and do my 1:23-1:22 he will no doubt have developed the car and gone quicker...but point is, the RB20 wont stop the car from being quick. Hell, LOL after a track day i jumped on the the forum and a guy was carrying on about "that silver GTR was damn quick and sounded tuff" LOL it wasnt a GTR :)

$4000 spent on an RB20 will make for a quicker car then $4000 spent transplanting an RB25. (as a rule)

So thats the long dribble answer...they make for a good, strong, reliable track engine, that push the car along pretty well:) ...oh and they rev and sound great, RB26s sound good but lazy. You can hear every rotation of the crank in an RB20 when you are pulling 8,000rpm...they sound frantic:)

PS, that link earlier has my dyno sheet in it...but between 215-234rwkws at between 14 or 17psi with an 8,300rwv limit. Has donw it for plenty of kms, plenty of track days...and not a smidge of oil in my catch can...bone dry :)

The rb30 works out too expensive if you want it too rev + your likely to overshoot your 250rwkw by a fair margin.

Well 450rwkw would be ideal, but its the expense thats holding me back at the moment, otherwise i'd go the rb31dett route without question hahaha. :)

But as long as i can turn the gts-t into a fun track car I'll be quite satisfied...

...For now.

:)

Wow, roy, thankyou very much for such a comprehensive answer. And for actually stating figures rather than just spewing propaganda.

Firstly, what state are you in. My car will be back on the road in about 2 weeks, and best thing is to take it for a drive and see what you think. Its a long way from the optimum/best set up...but its fun smile.gif

I wish i could take you up on that offer, but im in nsw, thanks anyway, I def need a ride in a 200+kw rb20 to give me a better idea.

So they are strong, next thing is they are cheap. For a short motor you are looking between $400-600. So if a pressure line drops of the fuel rail, or bad luck strikes then you are not in a big $$$ hole

Yes this is certainly a big attraction for me.

But here is the thing, take the car to the track and see how it compares to the bigger engined cars. Where they wheelspin out of corners with insatant hits of torque to the tyres...i can just flatten the thing and by the time its hits full boost im normally about that point of corner exit that it wont fry tyres.

Good point, as long as the power arrives in time for the exit.

The car can still go another 2-3 seconds quicker with more laps and gettign to know the track. So in my eyes thats pretty quick. If 330-350rwkws GTRs with a fair amount of engine, brake and suspension work are doing 1:20-1:21s, then im happy for a completely internally std RB20 with a Trust kit do be 1-2 seconds slower. smile.gif

Well theres an eye opener, just the sort of figures i was looking for, very impressed to say the least, imagine the look on the gtr drivers face when he gets passed by an rb20 powered gts-t that probably half the money spent on it and a quarter of the upkeep :laughing-smiley-014:

But on the track, what the slowest corner? 55-60km/h? Thats boost in 2nd gear so not a real issue.

For a 3,750rpm power band i average something like 215-220 rwkws so its a good wide power band. 2nd gear i rev to 8,200-8,300 rpm, but with the higher upshifts dont have to rev it so hard as the revs drop less from 3rd to 4th and 4th to 5th.

Thankyou, those figures pretty much alleviated all of my doubts. Consider this thread whizzed!

but point is, the RB20 wont stop the car from being quick. Hell, LOL after a track day i jumped on the the forum and a guy was carrying on about "that silver GTR was damn quick and sounded tuff" LOL it wasnt a GTR smile.gif

LOL, excellent!

Again thankyou for taking the time to answer my questions, I really appreciate and it's people like you make the skyline community so inviting. :):)

Well, my mind is at ease, still more research to do but the gts-t is looking promising at the moment.

Goodnight.

Edited by Stone in Focus
I wish i could take you up on that offer, but im in nsw, thanks anyway, I def need a ride in a 200+kw rb20 to give me a better idea.

Hopefully the person im thinking of reads this and may be able to help you out. A forum goer with a damn tasty GTSt is just about finihsed bolting up the same setup as mine. Im coming up to NSW in Nov to do a few track days so shoudl rock up then for a joy ride or 17 :)

Well theres an eye opener, just the sort of figures i was looking for, very impressed to say the least, imagine the look on the gtr drivers face when he gets passed by an rb20 powered gts-t that probably half the money spent on it and a quarter of the upkeep :laughing-smiley-014:

LOL...wont overtake them, but being 200-250kgs lighter helps you keep in touch. Imagine if a GTSt had 300rwkws? This guy was a bit shocked when i overtook him and pulled away down the front straight at Sandown (he was even running slicks) :)

Ferrari.jpg

yea rb20 rulz

i have a rb20 with a td06 which has been off the road for a while for other reasons.... its getting tuned at the momennt and managed close to 260rwkw's on 20psi this was before the fuel reg decided to start jamming... so once thats fixed i will post up the dyno sheet

hopefully my car will be back on the road in around 4 weeks... im in nsw as well so you can come for a ride and see for yourself what its like

when i was driving on 10 psi and about 185rwkw it was extremely fun to drive and i wouldnt say to laggy. I think a lot of people over exaggerate the laggyness of the rb20s....

LOL...wont overtake them, but being 200-250kgs lighter helps you keep in touch. Imagine if a GTSt had 300rwkws? This guy was a bit shocked when i overtook him and pulled away down the front straight at Sandown (he was even running slicks) smile.gif

Damn, you've sure got an impressive list of kills :) But I daresay a lot comes down to the abilitiy of the driver. Once the car is up to par anyway.

Hopefully the person im thinking of reads this and may be able to help you out. A forum goer with a damn tasty GTSt is just about finihsed bolting up the same setup as mine. Im coming up to NSW in Nov to do a few track days so shoudl rock up then for a joy ride or 17 smile.gif
hopefully my car will be back on the road in around 4 weeks... im in nsw as well so you can come for a ride and see for yourself what its like

I can't get over the generosity of people on this site. I'll definately have to take you up on those offers. Cheers guys.

LOL..Roy = Minister of RB20 propaganda :)

Firstly, what state are you in. My car will be back on the road in about 2 weeks, and best thing is to take it for a drive and see what you think. Its a long way from the optimum/best set up...but its fun :)

thats was a pretty inspirational post Troy! as you say, 250kg lighter with a competent driver can sure close down the gap to those gtrs....

Perhaps you'll let me take up that offer of a ride with your TD06? i can repay with a ride in my 32 HKS GTRS equipped.... :sorcerer:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Gotta admit, I love the 20b Cosmo.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...