Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First PFC tune May 06

Matt Spry's 237rwhp

Allstar same day 276rwhp

Mercury Motorsport the next day 296rwhp...

All with in 24 hours on the same tank for fuel and all at similar temp's...

Take your pick???

Matt's dyno does not have to be accutate. His workshop is a temple of tuning. He simply uses it to mark gains from start to finish and of course to spin the wheels for tuning purposes. His setup is not for power runs or for dyno days, its simply a tuning tool.

i was just in at matty sprys on friday and i spun up 165 vs 195rwkw at mercury a while back

he said he had new software, so was unsure how much different it would read

car still feels the same as when it was 195. .. . . .

Confuscious say a man with 2 watches will never know the exact time ;)

I only use the dyno to make sure my car is tuned/running safely. Real power is to be measured at the race track. Regardless of how much power you have after a few months the car will feel like a snail again and you just want more boost :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's face it. 90s turbo 6 with 80s tech in it is not going to be the thing that runs as clean as a whistle.
    • No. See below. No. In the specific case of Enthusiast, the wording in the PDS says, explicitly, " We will not pay any claim on a Vehicle with any Modifications not agreed by us and not listed in the Schedule. This includes any Modifications or the fitting of a device that contravenes the requirements of the Australian Design Rules [ADRs] or where allowed, the Australian Vehicle Standards Rules [AVSR]." The 2nd paragraph needs to be read in a different tone of voice from the 1st. The two concepts are connected, but they are two different concepts. The 1st says your mods must be listed and agreed with us. The 2nd effectively says "we won't pay if any mods are not legal". The way that it has been written in more general insurances for a long time has been that if the mod contributes to the accident then you're shit out of luck, but if the mod didn't contribute, then you'll probably get away with it. With "probably" being a very flexible term, and being an insurance company, better left untested than hoped on!
    • I'm not surprised, I favour a bit of a richer tune which for sure isn't helping the emission numbers.  
    • Overboosting is more likely a function of whatever boost controller you are using than the actuator. "Overboosting" is a feature of cheap boost tee type control. If you don't want to see peaks of overboost, you have to set it to not produce them. And that then means you don't run as much boost as you might like elsewhere. That's just life. Electronic boost controllers can generally be set to do a much better job of managing the peak boost.
    • Had a good chuckle because it is listing THC g/km. Though it is not tetrahydrocannabinol but total hydrocarbons. Interesting how the numbers seem so much worse compared to Greg's big V8.
×
×
  • Create New...