Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers guys. Things are cleared up now. If I was to point the finger I would do this...

Hey Victory,

Just read your post on SK's reccomendations for suspension setup. I was wondering if you had any suspension mods at all? Aftermarket adjustable camber/castor mechanisms? or is it bone stock suspension all round?

Cheers,

Sam

My GTS-T is totally stock in the suspension department and that was my issue. How can just a wheel alignment make that much difference to a car's handling?......

But off course I'm not pointing the finger. :/

Guess I should have asked more than one person before spending $77.00 on a wheel alignment to only end in a Toe adjustment. Should have just asked SK but I feel guilty everytime I PM him coz I'm sure everyone under the sun asks him for advice all day.

You haven't necessarily wasted any money. It is still important for the toe to be correct & that the rear camber be good. It is pretty common for (Especially the rear) the alignment settings to be rubbish when the cars some in from Japan. Which in turn can wreck your tyres prematurely.

Sydneykid's Recomendations are:

Front Camber -1.00

Front Caster 7.00

SAI 9.00

Front Toe 0.00

Rear Camber -0.5

Rear Toe 2.00 mm in on each side

I was able to achieve with my stock suspension:

Front Camber -1.20

Front Caster 6.35

SAI 9.10

Front Toe 0.00

Rear Camber -0.20

Rear Toe 1.50 mm in on each side

These results are close to the recomendations and will require the adjustable bushes to get that last little bit. My ride heights are also close to the suggested levels of about 25mm lower than stock front ride height of 380mm with 365mm front and 355mm rear.

Kennedy

This was one of my original posts that identified SydneyKids recommendations and what I was able to achieve with my specific car. I also made the comment that every car is a little bit different and when you have had a wheel alignment done you will find out how close your car is to the suggested settings.

Once you know what your car’s settings are then you can decide if you need to buy the caster and camber adjustment kits to get your car closer to the recommended settings

So what your saying is that you DO have adjustable castor and/or camber rods in your car. I think it would be best to alter your original post stating something along the lines of....castor and SAI is not adjustable at all via the stock suspension.

You haven't necessarily wasted any money. It is still important for the toe to be correct & that the rear camber be good. It is pretty common for (Especially the rear) the alignment settings to be rubbish when the cars some in from Japan. Which in turn can wreck your tyres prematurely.

My point being is that I would have gone out and bought the adjustable camber/castor rods before my wheel alignment so i could have done verything at once rather than having to do go back once I've installed adjustable parts. Wheel alignments arent cheap.

no, his point is he DOESN'T have adjustable anything. those results where what he was able to get with stock suspension.

What were you settings with stock suspension?

I had a wheel alignment a while ago and they said they had trouble doing the rear because the exhaust tip was gettting in the way of the laser sighting.

Anyone else have that issue?

Is it a issue or do these people not know what they are doing?

Thanks..

Birnie :ninja:

no, his point is he DOESN'T have adjustable anything. those results where what he was able to get with stock suspension.

What were you settings with stock suspension?

I'll have to check the sheet when I got home but I was not able to get anywhere near the settings that Victory was able too.

Victory, can you please post the settings you had BEFORE your wheel aligment? Just so we can see how much in mm/degrees you were able to adjust per area of suspension? I'm gobsmacked as to how you were able to achieve so much castor at the front without castor rods. (Which in turn would affect SAI i think...can someone confirm this?)

What other variables are there that will affect it? Wheel size? Tyre size/width? Perhaps I lost some functionalty when my stock suspension was replaced with coilovers?

nope, no loss of adjustment, but assuming your new suspension is lower than your old that will affect the camber and castor settings from the standard geometery. As djr81 said it is toe front and rear, and rear camber that you can adjust....and the rear camber adjustment is very limited too.

But if you put in lower shocks you shorten the distance between the upper and lower links which gives you more camber.

If you want to look at adjustable stuff Gary's kits are good, come with everything you need. At a minimum adjustable castor and some swaybars will help a lot - adding camber is not necesarily good for a street car since it affects tyre wear, but castor is fine.

I was able to achieve with my stock suspension:

Front Camber -1.20

Front Caster 6.35

SAI 9.10

Front Toe 0.00

Rear Camber -0.20

Rear Toe 1.50 mm in on each side

My ride heights are also close to the suggested levels of about 25mm lower than stock front ride height of 380mm with 365mm front and 355mm rear.

I was just very lucky that my car good factory settings of

Front Camber was -1.20 left and -1.15 right

Front Caster was 6.35 left and 6.25 right

Rear camber before -0.22 left and -1.38 right

Rear camber after -0.20 left and -0.59 right

My problems were in the toe -0.5 left and +0.2 right

and rear toe of +0.1 left and -0.8 right

The other important factor to consider is ride height - mine is 365mm front and 355mm rear which is not much lower than the standard 380mm. Skylines do not like being too low as it changes the geometry a lot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...