Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Taken from: http://www.leesracing.com/articles/a1.html

Research Octane Number (RON)

is measured under mild conditions and is more important in controlling part throttle knock.

Motor Octane Number (MON)

is measured under more severe conditions and is most important for octane satisfaction at wide open throttle.

Anti-Knock Index (AKI)

is the average of the RON and MON. This is the number posted on the retail gasoline pumps normally indicating 87, 89, or 92 octane. Racing gasoline have AKI's from 100 to 118

Taken from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

The most common type of octane rating worldwide is the Research Octane Number (RON).

Edited by MintR33
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's up to your car to tell you which fuel it's gonna like best.

For example, i run Caltex Vortex 98 and BP Ultimate. The car runs like a dream on BP but its halfway across the city for me to get a tank, so it doesnt see it much.

Caltex Vortex it runs fine on, no complaints, the knock sensor never shows knock when giving it a bootfull.

Shell Optimax however has given me some cases of knock when booting... alot of people say that optimax is good to reduce knock and shit but i guess it all depends on your car, because it didnt reduce knock on mine.

So just try a fresh tank of them all and decide for yourself.

It's up to your car to tell you which fuel it's gonna like best.

For example, i run Caltex Vortex 98 and BP Ultimate. The car runs like a dream on BP but its halfway across the city for me to get a tank, so it doesnt see it much.

Caltex Vortex it runs fine on, no complaints, the knock sensor never shows knock when giving it a bootfull.

Shell Optimax however has given me some cases of knock when booting... alot of people say that optimax is good to reduce knock and shit but i guess it all depends on your car, because it didnt reduce knock on mine.

So just try a fresh tank of them all and decide for yourself.

Hi Justin, where are you located?

:P cheers :dry:

always used bp ultimate around my local, could feel a difference and per tank of gas got further on avg, real numbers

filled in parra @ teh wooly's station as was getting onto empty line thanx to misses picking me up an not gassing up ^^ best tank of fuel ever, best price was packed cuase tehy sell cheaper than everywhere. the fact that shite loads of fuel goes through, "fresher" fuel maybe, less time swishing in tanks with the added station mixers ? eh eitehr way, went the furthest ever, like freakishly better, no a single frigging nock and 200k's to less than half tank, when i get 300k's on avg per tank.

97 s2 stocker with cat back, mod suspension and a quickshift kit

you mean this link??

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...treme&st=20

From SydneyKid

"A/F ratios are based on weight, not volume, hence the need for specific gravity of the fuels.

Moving on...............we have a new project car, an R33GTST that is in need of some TLC. One of the recent upgrades was a Power FC. As most people are aware, the default ignition maps are a little advanced for Optimax, Ultimate or Vortex 98. Not as bad as they used to be for 95 ron fuels, but still a tad. Obviously I will tune it properly eventually , but we have a few mods to go yet and I don’t have the time to tune it multiple times. So the idea was to stick the Power FC in and run it on the default maps for a couple of weeks. On Optimax and Ultimate (didn’t try Vortex) it was reaching knock of 60+ up our usual test hill in 4th gear as logged on the datalogit. The dash warning was also flashing frequently, as it is set for 60, in normal day to day driving around. When the tank was just about empty this week, we filled it up with Optimax Extreme (@ 5 cents a litre more than Optimax). Several runs up the hill and we are not seeing knock over 10. And zero dash warnings in 3 days of normal driving.

Now that is very worthwhile, there is not enough Optimix Extreme around yet for me to tune it exclusively for 100 ron, but it sure will be a useful for the odd track day or run down the ¼.

I will monitor the effects of the ethanol on the fuel lines, o’rings and seals over the next few weeks. The injectors and fuel pump will have to come out shortly so I will check their condition as well. I am not anticipating any problems, but it is still worth checking.

cheers:)"

Hi Justin, where are you located?

;) cheers :happy:

Hey SK,

I'm in Canberra. I havent tried Optimax extreme or whatever the ethanol one is, but the optimax 98RON. I filled up a popular servo in my area so i'm going to assume it was pretty fresh.

I found it strange that i saw knock with it when all i've heard people say is that it will reduce knock.

If your car is stock I see no reason why you cant use any 98 RON fuels. If its modded then probably BP Ultimate is good.

My car is stock I mainly buy Optimax when I have 4 cent discount vouchers from Coles and BI LO or get Ultimate. I run Ultimate every second or third tank anyway.

I also use Mobile 8000 Synergy but very rare.

220-250k's to a FULL tank is doing well on bp ultimate, vortex 98 from popular stations seems the go 400+k's, stuff al back fires and much less overfueling like my car isnt running on the safe map, there are no popular bp servo's in sydneys west, everyone goes the cheaper fuel proly why i can get decent vortex, 4c off aye.

anyways the vortex "seems" to drive better,

thats real odd.......

whats the difference between vortex and ultimate performance wise....anyone tried?

im gonna fill up my next tank with vortex...ill see how it goes

well I tried most high octane fuels in my r33, such as Mobil premium, Optimax, Ultimate, And i felt that when i startyed using Vortex98 my car ran alot better, more perfromance, more km's out of a tank, and alot less backfire(hardly any at all). I would strongly reccommend Vortex, but by the looks alot of different people cars run better on a range of fuels. My advise would be to try them all! see how you go.

Yeh bro just put fawken good old leaded in there she be right. Car might cough and fart bit ay heh but she be right, then just chuck bit of supercheap carby cleaner through intake every 500k's or so car should run sweet. >_<

Todays prices i think our only choices is to use the 98 octane. I havent noticed difference between BP and vortex

Edited by siiick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...