Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If the thing flows a bit better, flows more evenly and is better at equalising cylinder filling across all cylinders...doesnt it stand to reason that a "weaker" cylinder will not ping earlier then the "better" cylinders...maximising the effeciency of the engine?

Don't forget a turbo acts like a fuel pump. It only pushes air. It requires a restriction to create boost pressure. It is moreso the boost pressure combined with the flow of the turbo which determines volumetric efficiency. The smallest area the air must get through is the valve space. There is no 'weak' cylinder as they are not all on intake at the same or similar times. It is the turbo which must continue to push air once the valve opens and there is a pressure drop in the system. If the turbo fails to provide a volume of air suffiecient to fill all cylinders at once then it will not be able to keep up at high rpm, air speed is reduced and power drops. What the design of the plenum does is maximise the 'efficient' space that the turbo can store air before the valve opens. Go too big and you will suffer in the lower end of the rev range for torque but increase your max rpm potential....go too small and the inverse is true. Usually a good plenum size is around twice the capacity of the engine. Runner length also has a major role to play in choosing a plenum/intake manifold as you want to achieve maximum torque at a desired rpm. The longer the runners, the lower the rpm you will have your torque band....and the same applies for this as the plenum in that you don't want to go too far. Runner design is important in that if you just weld some pipe to a barrel, you won't need to put it on a dyno for me to tell you it's not going to be efficient. Instead, bell mouth runners inside the plenum that taper down to the inlet port of the cyliner head to increase air speed as it enters the cylinder head is the better option. Once again there are more factors that play here and also protrusion of the runners into the plenum, diameter of runners, plenum shape, throttle body size in comparison to plenum size and then all of the above compared to engine capacity and whether or not it's forced inducted or not.

As you can see there is much more then just size and shape.....it's not always a case of what looks good, works well. I'm not saying that the aforementioned plenum does not work....I have not seen it or inside it for that matter. Just the usual educate the masses and help them make their own decision saga. Yunno the one about the 'teach a man to fish'. lol

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice work, but how do you fish? That makes sense though what you said dan. I dare say it would make a difference, but to actually compare the before and after would be a better scenario, and also to compare b and a for any car for that matter would give a much better proven result so we can accept closure on this matter. On that note more than one car would have to prove this statement whether nay or yay it does actually improve results by that much. I dare say that IF there were more people willing to actually go through with this and share results of before and after would be of most benefitial for all of us not alone the plazmaman plenum dealer.

Cheers A

Don't forget a turbo acts like a fuel pump. It only pushes air. It requires a restriction to create boost pressure. It is moreso the boost pressure combined with the flow of the turbo which determines volumetric efficiency. The smallest area the air must get through is the valve space. There is no 'weak' cylinder as they are not all on intake at the same or similar times. It is the turbo which must continue to push air once the valve opens and there is a pressure drop in the system. If the turbo fails to provide a volume of air suffiecient to fill all cylinders at once then it will not be able to keep up at high rpm, air speed is reduced and power drops. What the design of the plenum does is maximise the 'efficient' space that the turbo can store air before the valve opens. Go too big and you will suffer in the lower end of the rev range for torque but increase your max rpm potential....go too small and the inverse is true. Usually a good plenum size is around twice the capacity of the engine. Runner length also has a major role to play in choosing a plenum/intake manifold as you want to achieve maximum torque at a desired rpm. The longer the runners, the lower the rpm you will have your torque band....and the same applies for this as the plenum in that you don't want to go too far. Runner design is important in that if you just weld some pipe to a barrel, you won't need to put it on a dyno for me to tell you it's not going to be efficient. Instead, bell mouth runners inside the plenum that taper down to the inlet port of the cyliner head to increase air speed as it enters the cylinder head is the better option. Once again there are more factors that play here and also protrusion of the runners into the plenum, diameter of runners, plenum shape, throttle body size in comparison to plenum size and then all of the above compared to engine capacity and whether or not it's forced inducted or not.

As you can see there is much more then just size and shape.....it's not always a case of what looks good, works well. I'm not saying that the aforementioned plenum does not work....I have not seen it or inside it for that matter. Just the usual educate the masses and help them make their own decision saga. Yunno the one about the 'teach a man to fish'. lol

LOL...yeh all very good. You have read some texts on manifold desing...but none of what you have said is specific to the RB25 or manifold in question :)

Doesnt change the fact that if you pull the plugs on a std RB they are never the same...you are tuning based around the average of the air the cylinders are consuming and the fuel youre dumping in them. Even then you are only tuning based around the fuel coming out of all the cylinders. One cylinder will be detonating before the others...that limits the ignition/tune you can get into the engine.

You dont need an engine dyno and Motec logging individual cylinders (though speak to those that have set up their RBs on dynos with Motec and they do actually use the individual cylinder injector settings)...the plugs tell you that not all is right. Could also be the fact that cylinder 6 runs the hottest, could be the injector rail isnt equal for all cylinders. Could be the airflow in the manifolds is a compromise....and a better manifold specifically design for a performance application on RBs can help get around this problem

Anyway...i dont really care...need to do some numbers and see whether i should go Plazmaman or jsut go RB26 head

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No intention of driving the car the way it's set up now, just wanting to make sure I haven't made any mistakes along the way so that the tune can go smoothly, I don't want to waste anyone's time with stupid issues. And of course I intend to get it towed to the dyno in a completed state 😅 I have the base fuel pressure with the vacuum disconnected set at about 40psi, which I believe is at least relatively close to stock fuel pressure, maybe I'll have a fiddle with the reg and see what happens. For all I know I could be wasting my time with this and I should just plumb it in and see what the tuner reckons. I just find it a bit strange that it seems to be under so much load just free revving, but maybe that's just a result of the turbo slowing down the exhaust gasses and making a restriction in the flow, with no boost to compensate.
    • The boy just hit up google translate and it worked a treat, he said step one was "please urinate with precision and elegance", he then sent me the correct translation  I get some new loctite for the small fixtures tomorrow and get some "dort" going after that 🤣
    • Right, so is the fuel pressure the same as it was previously? If not, well, it's not going to work well. I can understand the theory I assume you are going for, which is: "Run it N/A, and if I have the original AFM, and same amount of fuel and intake air as previously, the fact there's a turbo in my exhaust should still make it run" Which it... might? Provided you don't actually change how much air or fuel is going into the car.. or getting out. But if you have changed that, all bets are off. What is the purpose to even have the car run this way? To get it to a tuner? And if the goal is to limp it to a tuner, you're still going to what - plumb up a whole intercooler system and new intake in the parking lot out front before your tune......?
    • Haha yea it's a bit of a weird setup at the moment, just wanted to make sure I sorted out any headaches before dyno day. At the moment I've changed the exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe, 460lph fuel pump and rising rate reg as well as the previously mentioned headstuds and gasket. The nistune was already mapped for the car as it was and drove around for a few months no worries. The plan is to run flex fuel hence the big pump, which I've wired direct to the battery through a relay to avoid voltage issues.
    • Um. Was the ECU the same as the one previously there? I know R33's needed R32 GTST ECU's or other tomfoolery to run Nistune. This is such a wild setup. Most people would plumb in the turbo then not drive the car (i.e tow it to a tuner). What's actually changed since it last ran?
×
×
  • Create New...